Josh, Rich, et al.,
On 1/5/07, Rich Teer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Note that lsof doesn't have to do kmem craling. For
example on Linux
it only uses proper procfs interfaces. As such proper
interfaces seem
to exist on Solaris as well
Peter Tribble wrote:
On 1/1/07, wb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a /tmp FS for swap, and a really big file crout*
inside. The /tmp was 95% up.
I decided to remove the crout file.
The problem, is the /tmp is not decreasing, but still
growing.
How could I make it decrease?
Roland Mainz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somehow I am wondering why Solaris doesn't ship lsof in /usr/sbin/ ...
is this just noone had time yet or something else ?
Wasn't there a blog where someone explained why lsof is a perfornance pig
and should be avoided in favor of other tools?
Jörg
--
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Roland Mainz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somehow I am wondering why Solaris doesn't ship lsof in /usr/sbin/ ...
is this just noone had time yet or something else ?
Wasn't there a blog where someone explained why lsof is a perfornance pig
and should be avoided in
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Martin Bochnig wrote:
[ ... ]
What I had seen is, that you apparently have to rebuild it for Solaris10
06/06, versions built for older releases don't work correctly under
06/06 anymore.
But that's certainly not a reason, why SUNW couldn't ship it.
Well, so what exactly
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:59:27AM +, Frank Hofmann wrote:
On the other hand, the request for lsof in Solaris is anything but new,
and the reference to pfiles, the mentioning that lsof does nasty digging
in the kernel's intestines as a reply is neither, and the arguments that
the output
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:59:27AM +, Frank Hofmann wrote:
On the other hand, the request for lsof in Solaris is anything but new,
and the reference to pfiles, the mentioning that lsof does nasty digging
in the kernel's intestines as a reply is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No; it's something that we won't ship, ever because of the
nature how lsof trawls for its events.
That's not true.
Though there are folks around who have expressed the never opinion,
that does not represent the opinion of all of Solaris development.
Our group has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No; it's something that we won't ship, ever because of the
nature how lsof trawls for its events.
That's not true.
+1 for a project to integrate the lsof command line interface. Design
and implementation to be determined. ;-}
Strange as it may seem, this is pretty
On 1/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Tribble wrote:
On 1/1/07, wb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a /tmp FS for swap, and a really big file crout*
inside. The /tmp was 95% up.
I decided to remove the crout file.
The problem, is the /tmp is not decreasing, but
On 1/5/07, Frank Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Martin Bochnig wrote:
I think Sun has to overcome both not invented here and the instinctive
reject via not perfect, therefore not 'good enough' no matter what the
users say, before lsof goes into mainstream Solaris.
If
On 1/5/07, Rich Teer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Note that lsof doesn't have to do kmem craling. For example on Linux
it only uses proper procfs interfaces. As such proper interfaces seem
to exist on Solaris as well for use with pfiles it shouldn't
Josh Hurst wrote:
On 1/5/07, Frank Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Martin Bochnig wrote:
I think Sun has to overcome both not invented here and the instinctive
reject via not perfect, therefore not 'good enough' no matter what the
users say, before lsof goes into mainstream
Josh Hurst writes:
On 1/5/07, Frank Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Martin Bochnig wrote:
I think Sun has to overcome both not invented here and the instinctive
reject via not perfect, therefore not 'good enough' no matter what the
users say, before lsof goes into
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Josh Hurst wrote:
Vic's name is spelled 'Abell', two e-
Whoops, my bad! Sorry Vic (I thought something didn't look quite
right when I wrote that post)...
--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
. *
No; it's something that we won't ship, ever because of the
nature how lsof trawls for its events.
You could send patches to fix lsfo if you do not like it's implementation :)
You could check the source code and look for my name there.
While I understand James' aversion against my comments, I
On 1/5/07, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just because /bin/sh isn't your shell of choice doesn't make it crappy.
Really?
Take 1:
/bin/sh /dev/urandom
Illegal Instruction (core dumped)
Take 2-29:
cat /var/adm/messages* | grep -F core.sh | sort
Dec 10 11:09:41 fido genunix: [ID
Peter Tribble wrote:
On 1/1/07, wb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a /tmp FS for swap, and a really big file crout*
inside. The /tmp was 95% up.
I decided to remove the crout file.
The problem, is the /tmp is not decreasing, but still
growing.
How could I make it decrease?
18 matches
Mail list logo
