Hi Shawn,
Thank you for the info, did not know that the build system had so little
opportunities for distribution.
Unfortunately, this is the most powerful hardware I have available here, so I
will have to make use of it.
The only upgrade I can do additionally is to add another 512MB to one
Hi Ian,
Yes, you are right. There are several pc's here that are much more powerful.
However, although I haven't tried it myself, my impression is that the
cross-compiler (i86 gcc that produces sparc code) is not able to compile the
whole kernel without problem. But I might be wrong. Would be
Kyle McDonald wrote:
Juergen Keil wrote:
Can you try ls -lR / | truss more ? What kind of error
does it get (when it tries to read from stderr fd#2) ?
Looks like EBADF:
# ls -lR / | truss more
...
write(2, 07, 1) = 1
read(2, 0x08047AF0, 1)
REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER
Sorry for a late notice and due to the holiday schedule we're having our
meeting a week late (Dec. meeting will be 1 week early also next month).
We are pleased to announce John Weeks, presenting Multilevel Web Services
which utilize
Process 10 has it's stderr open on the console in O_WRONLY mode.
And a svcprop svc:/system/install-discovery:default
(or svcprop install-discovery) reveals this start/exec property:
/sbin/install-discovery /dev/console /dev/console 21
Looks like that needs to be fixed:
On 29/11/2007, Mladen Nikitovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ian,
Yes, you are right. There are several pc's here that are much more powerful.
However, although I haven't tried it myself, my impression is that the
cross-compiler (i86 gcc that produces sparc code) is not able to compile the
I am trying to find the following information regarding the logging of telnet
sessions within a Solaris 10 environment:
(1) How can I tell if the logging of telnet sessions is enabled on a Solaris
10 machine?
(2) Assuming that the logging of telnet sessions is not enabled, what is the
FWIW, I'm not interested :)
Cheeri,
Calum.
Even if it is Solaris-based and/or Sun-licensed? :-)
Don't mean to be picky, but the more emphatic part of my comment was if the
price is right and the software concerns can be addressed. (Trademark does
matter, doesn't it? Another smiley)
Rob Sandifer wrote:
I am trying to find the following information regarding the logging of telnet
sessions within a Solaris 10 environment:
(1) How can I tell if the logging of telnet sessions is enabled on a Solaris
10 machine?
(2) Assuming that the logging of telnet sessions is not
Thanks for the heads-up on the security-discuss group!
To answer your question, I am interested in logging telnet logon/authentication
events. Thanks!
RobSand
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Can you file a bug? solaris/solaris_install/install_setup would be the
classification for this.
Regards,
sarah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Process 10 has it's stderr open on the console in O_WRONLY mode.
And a svcprop svc:/system/install-discovery:default
(or svcprop
Martin, if you read this, you can always come back. We understand you. I do,
at least.
http://blogs.sun.com/MissMichelle/
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Rob Sandifer wrote:
Thanks for the heads-up on the security-discuss group!
To answer your question, I am interested in logging telnet
logon/authentication events. Thanks!
Using Solaris Auditing to log detailed information about all logins:
Turn on Solaris Auditing using
Mladen Nikitovic wrote:
Hi Ian,
Yes, you are right. There are several pc's here that are much more powerful.
However, although I haven't tried it myself, my impression is that the
cross-compiler (i86 gcc that produces sparc code) is not able to compile the
whole kernel without problem.
Hi Steve,
I am working with the Virtual Appliance group here at Sun. We are presently
using VMWare Fusion 1.1 as well. I recall having a similar issue with the long
delay. My colleague had a different image that booted up quite fast. The only
thing we can think of is that the 64-bit version of
Hello,
I am wondering if I can install both Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris (11) on the
same x86 machine? I hope I can use a boot loader to select which OS to boot.
Tom
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On 29/11/2007, Kevin Duffey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Steve,
I am working with the Virtual Appliance group here at Sun. We are presently
using VMWare Fusion 1.1 as well. I recall having a similar issue with the
long delay. My colleague had a different image that booted up quite fast.
The
On 29/11/2007, Tom Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am wondering if I can install both Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris (11) on the
same x86 machine? I hope I can use a boot loader to select which OS to boot.
Yes, but you will either have to use a liveupgrade setup to setup the
two, or you
Tom == Tom Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom I am wondering if I can install both Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris
Tom (11) on the same x86 machine? I hope I can use a boot loader to
Tom select which OS to boot.
I think you could use multiple LiveUpgrade boot environments to set
this up. GRUB should
http://directorymanager.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/an-open-letter-to-the-opends-community-and-to-sun-microsystems/
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all
junction types--in the absence of
Shawn,
Thank you for bringing that to our attention.
On Nov 29, 2007 9:01 PM, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://directorymanager.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/an-open-letter-to-the-opends-community-and-to-sun-microsystems/
Shawn,
Thank you for bringing that to our attention.
I look
Thanks for the response Kevin.
It appears that the issue is indeed 64bit booting in Nevada.
This time around I modified my grub config to boot the 32bit kernel
(easily accomplished by removing $ISADIR as in Ian Murdock's post) -
this seems to have fixed the issue.
Any ideas if VMware/Sun is
http://directorymanager.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/an-op
en-letter-to-the-opends-community-and-to-sun-microsyst
ems/
--
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/
We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all
uses of all
junction types--in the
Ché Kristo wrote:
We all hope as Neil suggested in his post that this is an isolated incident
arising from a rogue middle manager. Given the whole fiasco we had around the
use of the OpenSolaris brand for Indiana it would be good judgement for Sun
to reply to this news in a very
Shawn,
Thank you for bringing that to our attention.
On Nov 29, 2007 9:01 PM, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://directorymanager.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/an-open-letter-to-the-opends-community-and-to-s
un-microsystems/
Shawn,
Thank you for bringing that to our attention.
I
On Nov 30, 2007, at 1:51 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
What do 4 out of the above 5 questions have to do with OpenSolaris?
Everything.
If Sun can gut OpenDS like that and put the project's own governance
under duress, whose to say the same won't happen to prominent
OpenSolaris.org projects?
Dale Ghent wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007, at 1:51 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
What do 4 out of the above 5 questions have to do with OpenSolaris?
Everything.
If Sun can gut OpenDS like that and put the project's own governance
under duress, whose to say the same won't happen to prominent
On Nov 30, 2007, at 1:51 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
What do 4 out of the above 5 questions have to do with OpenSolaris?
Everything.
If Sun can gut OpenDS like that and put the project's own governance
under duress, whose to say the same won't happen to prominent
OpenSolaris.org projects?
How
28 matches
Mail list logo
