[osol-discuss] Re: Remote X-windows problems

2005-06-30 Thread Gary Gendel
Alan, Build 16 fixed the I/O problem, but it seems to exacerbate the login problem. The delays have gone up to several minutes. Any ideas on what to do to debug this? It's kind of frustrating that it takes me 4-8 minutes to log on. Thanks for the help Gary This message posted from

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: OpenSolaris distributions and package managment

2005-06-30 Thread Shawn Walker
On 6/29/05, TJ Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is not a bug ;) It is a feature that let me pick TWW over openpkg. Right, wasn't saying that it was, just pointing out it doesn't really provide a native packaging solution, which means TWW right now isn't as useful since the native Solaris

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [dtrace-discuss] Re: b17 copying behaviour?

2005-06-30 Thread Dragan Cvetkovic
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, [UTF-8] Jürgen Keil wrote: Dragan Cvetkovic wrote: I have noticed quite a few carrier_errors on the server bash-3.00# kstat -n elxl0 | grep carrier carrier_errors 842217 but how came it affects NFS but doesn't affect e.g. ftp? Some time ago

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: [dtrace-discuss] Re: b17 copying behaviour?

2005-06-30 Thread Jürgen Keil
Quite a few people have reported full duplex problems with the elxl driver; maybe there's a bug somewhere in the elxl driver with full/half duplex negotiation? I have tried forcing half duplex 100Mbps in /kernel/drv/elxl.conf, but it didn't help. With the old card I remember even

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Remote X-windows problems

2005-06-30 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Gary Gendel wrote: Alan, Build 16 fixed the I/O problem, but it seems to exacerbate the login problem. The delays have gone up to several minutes. Any ideas on what to do to debug this? It's kind of frustrating that it takes me 4-8 minutes to log on. The only thing I can think of there

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: OpenSolaris distributions and package managment

2005-06-30 Thread Shawn Walker
On 6/30/05, Keith M Wesolowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Or non-portability, as the case may be. Static linking no longer works on Solaris. For that matter, what mainstream platform doesn't support dynamic linking? Uh...static linking does too work on Solaris 10 :P It may not work for base OS

Re: [osol-discuss] Booting my built kernel gives cannot mount root path

2005-06-30 Thread Sherry Moore
Would you please include the output of ::msgbuf? What kind of system is this? Do you happen to have an Adaptec card in it? Sherry On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 04:32:35PM -0700, Raymond Scott wrote: After an apparently successful compile of the kernel using Studio 10 on my X86 platform, I used

[osol-discuss] Re: Booting my built kernel gives cannot mount root path

2005-06-30 Thread Raymond Scott
Dan is right... we figured it out last night. I had used the snv_16 express build to get my PC up and running. downloaded the source and closed bins and ran the compile (and it DID run... 6.5 hours.. 600Mhz CPU...) I used Install to create the tarball and then laid it down into