Sunay Tripahi (Crossbow)
http://labs.oracle.com/minds/2007-0710/
I forgot about him:-) his latest blog post is an interesting read:
Solaris as an Open Source alternative to Linux
http://sunaytripathi.wordpress.com/
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 26 Oct 2010, at 03:23, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Hmm. If one wrote and distributed a free Firefox plugin or extension,
then all web surfing (and checking one's email for bug reports) would
be development and test, right? :-)
If one wrote a GUI front-end for configuring something
Edward Martinez mindbende...@live.com wrote:
If I can remember correctly i think it was Mike Shapiro who canceled
opensolaris
He send the mail. this may be a decision influenced by him or by his boss.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353
[...]
Oracle are targeting Solaris at Banks. They don't
seem to want a Solaris community. They seem to want
your money, and only want you using Solaris 11
Express if you're developing for it, evaluating it,
or intend to buy it.
Not sure if it's so much greed as control freaks.
Or else they
Sorry, your comments about banks is totally wrong. Yes, they do need
screaming performance, and yes many run Solaris at many levels. How do I
know? It's my day job
On 26 October 2010 18:10, Richard L. Hamilton rlha...@smart.net wrote:
[...]
But going after _banks_, please. Sun had a
Speaking as someone who has worked extensively in the financial services world,
I can tell you that performance is key. You'd be surprised at how many
mid-range
to high-end SPARC servers are in banks today. And I'm not talking about E10ks,
I'm talking about 6900-25Ks and M5000-M9000s. A lot of
Octave Orgeron unixcons...@yahoo.com wrote:
Speaking as someone who has worked extensively in the financial services
world,
I can tell you that performance is key. You'd be surprised at how many
mid-range
to high-end SPARC servers are in banks today. And I'm not talking about
E10ks,
Hi gurus,
I wrote a multithread application by pthread and bind the threads with specific
cpu cores by processor_bind(), now I am wanting to confirm if the binding is
effective. I wonder if there is a system call to return the current core_id of
a certain thread? I failed to get the answer by
Look at the PBIND_QUERY flag in processor_bind(2). The manpage
suggests (though it's not as clear as it could be IMO) that it will
return the current binding into the processorid_t structure pointed to
by the 4th parameter.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:43 AM, dengning dunning2...@gmail.com wrote:
have you checked ps(1) ?
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:43 AM, dengning dunning2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi gurus,
I wrote a multithread application by pthread and bind the threads with
specific cpu cores by processor_bind(), now I am wanting to confirm if the
binding is effective. I wonder if
Hi,
I'm planning to use the replication scripts on that page :
http://www.infrageeks.com/groups/infrageeks/wiki/8fb35/zfs_autoreplicate_script.html
It uses the timeslider (other way possible) to take snapshots, uses zfs
send/receive to replicate and another script for cleaning up the old
Dear All,
Please click on the following photo links [photographs of Singapore
Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)].
[0] http://i.imgur.com/xTfLr.jpg
[1] http://i54.tinypic.com/2415z7t.jpg
[2] http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/7534/enmingteodscf2511.jpg
[3]
Interesting on the merge.
C. L. Whitely
a
href=http://www.bonanza.com/booths/cyndarelli/items/Power_Balance_Wristband_Silicone_Wholesale_black_clear_pink;power
balance wristbands silicone wholesale black clear pink white xs extra small s
small medium m large l x large xl/a
a
, they also need to avoid alienating
their best developers and also all the small-time
users
(students, programmers/sysadmins that also use
Solaris
at home, small businesses)
Only if we could get all those superstar devs that left to join either
OpenIndiana, Illumos,nexenta. I would love
Why is the console interface left so primitive?.
Seems it would at
least have a usable mouse so one could have some chance of copy paste
when there are what appear to be important messages written to
console.
This is only a problem, of course if you cannot manage a gui boot for
whatever reason,
On 26 Oct 2010, at 23:05, Edward Martinez wrote:
, they also need to avoid alienating
their best developers and also all the small-time
users
(students, programmers/sysadmins that also use
Solaris
at home, small businesses)
Only if we could get all those superstar devs that left to join
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:14:24 -0500
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
Why is the console interface left so primitive?.
Seems it would at
least have a usable mouse so one could have some chance of copy paste
when there are what appear to be important messages written to
console.
(stuff
rea...@newsguy.com said:
Why is the console interface left so primitive?.
Seems it would at least have a usable mouse so one could have some chance
of copy paste when there are what appear to be important messages written to
console.
Hi Harry,
As someone else mentioned, most of this stuff
Do you mean that if the third parameter is PBIND_QUERY while the last parameter
is not NULL (obind here), the binding processorid structure will be stored in
the last processorid_t obind? Then, I could read it...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
That is what the manpage suggests. Looking at the source, it looks
like that's what it does as well.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:33 PM, dengning dunning2...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you mean that if the third parameter is PBIND_QUERY while the last
parameter is not NULL (obind here), the binding
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Marion Hakanson hakan...@ohsu.edu wrote:
rea...@newsguy.com said:
Why is the console interface left so primitive?.
Seems it would at least have a usable mouse so one could have some chance
of copy paste when there are what appear to be important messages
21 matches
Mail list logo
