solaris kdyndns[3689]: [ID 904790 user.error]
dyndns: both non-secure and secure updates failed on all configured name
servers
As always thanks,
Andrew
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss
I know this is a Solaris 11 point, but I thought still good place to
post questions just in cas ethe answer is out there.
I thought I would set-up Solaris 11 version of Sendmail with AUTH SASL,
but when I got to the final part, I get the error:
# /usr/lib/sendmail -d0 -bt /dev/null
PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE
tank/cindy share name=cindy,path=/tank/cindy,prot=nfs,sec=sys local
On 12/13/11 09:47, Andrew Watkins wrote:
I know this is a Solaris 11 point, but I thought it would be still good
to post strange behavior with Solaris 11. At least if anyone else
notices it and to decide
,
Andrew
On 12/10/11 05:05 PM, Chris Ridd wrote:
On 9 Dec 2011, at 16:05, Andrew Watkins wrote:
Hi,
I will try here as my first port of call.
I am using Samba to server files to our Windows users and I want them to change
permissions of files so they can give access to other users.
Before any
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
?
The blog entries I have followed (why are they never 100% complete!)
http://blog.mc-thias.org/?title=registering-a-samba-solaris-10-server-as-a-ms-ad-membermore=1c=1tb=1pb=1
http://blog.allanglesit.com/2011/03/solaris-11-join-ad-domain-for-samba/
Any pointers?
Cheers,
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck
find it the best way to configure a needed system. That
said, using sudo to just avoid the use of RBAC is probably not the best
use.
Brian
On 11/11/11 11:37 AM, Andrew Watkins wrote:
I have lost the ability of making a user have access to root on Solaris
11 using the command pfexec.
On the old
Can I ask if raidz is support on root with Solaris 11?
I am having problem doing it from auto-installer and I just thought that
may be the reason.
Cheers,
Andrew
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
pfexec working again?
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
guess this is a bug?
Andrew
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com/
On 01/11/11 10:29 AM, Ryan Park wrote:
Hello all,
First I like to thank you for the help. Thank you.
I have created smb share on opensolaris 134.
joined windows 2008 active directory and map
will not bother working on it.
Also, I guess since it requires Intel help then the OpenSolaris versions
of Solaris will not get any fixes either. So, the question Solaris 11
is dead on desktops is becoming true
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com
you are attempting to connect to has to be setup to allow
connections from other hosts. You use xhost for this. Something like
this:
xhost +ipAddressOfRemoteClient
or
xhost +NameofRemoteClient
see man xhost
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com
trial/evaluation software. Like Solaris 10, production
use requires support contracts.
But, I thought security patches were always available for free?
But, I could be wrong!
Andrew
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com
Brandon High wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:06 PM, John Ryan john.r...@internode.on.net wrote:
Why not CIFS then? - It's streaks ahead of Samba
Samba has some advantages, such as the ability to act as domain
controller or AD master. The native cifs server certainly wins on
performance,
contain valid Solaris partition
OM May 27 03:48:27 Couldn't set fdisk attributes.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com
the project.
George
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Just wondering if anyone worked out the problem with the slow reboot with iscsi.
I am seeing this myself now.
Andrew
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I thought it was a problem with the graphics driver, but you are right
as soon as I start gdm the box dies and my remote ssh session are dead..
I will try again to see if I can get any error messages... Only got 1GB!
Same here with me - thought that it may be some problem in the versions
Has any one gone to http://www.sun.com today?
You get http://www.oracle.com
Very quick change
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Well, I am sure over the next few weeks we will get lots of version
upgrades:
Oracle Studio 12.2
Oracle Solaris 10 02/10
and
OracleOS 5.10.1
Andrew
On 28/01/2010 21:02, Sergio Schvezov wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 22:24 +0800, Norbert P. Copones wrote:
but a link to opensolaris is
I am just wondering if the default lower limit should be increased from
512MB when installed on small memory machines and depending on size of disk!
The reason is I just tried a image-update of OpenSolaris 2009.06 to the
latest dev release 127 and had the following message:
pkg: There is
the corner.
Andrew
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
in any form ...etc
8.1.1 Will support http, https client/ server protocols
8.1.4 Will support boot from network but use local client profile on
USB, CD/DVD
8.2.1 CD/DVD/USB automated installation will be supported
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com
I think this is a great shame since OpenSolaris Indiana 2009.06 is not
ready to replace Solaris. I think many users are using SXCE since they
want the new features of OpenSolaris, but Indiana is not ready for that job.
Here is the reasons including my real bugbear!
- Automated Install
Andrew,
With that in mind how would a user find out which package has the given
program in it.
So, I want gimp how do I know which package it is in??
Andrew
russell aspinwall wrote:
Hi,
At present I have both OpenSolaris 2009.06 and Solaris Express CE b114
running on my computer within
Of course, however I just received an email from Amazon that my order
got delayed.
It has just arrived from Amazon UK. It's a big book...
Andrew
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
100.
Andrew
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Chen,
How are you making the bootable USB in the first place?
Have you followed the example which can be located on ether of these two
blogs:
http://blogs.sun.com/dminer/entry/opensolaris_developer_preview_on_usb
or
Come on folks!
The first answer should be What has this got to do with OpenSolaris?
But you are presuming that the file has only the 4 lines in it. What happens if
the crontab is much longer
# more data here
0 0 * * * /usr/bin/true
#Start of lines added by SUNWscu
20 4 * * 0
It's true, OpenSolaris (Indiana) will replace Solaris Express Developer
Edition after SXDE 1/08.
I am a bit surprised that you think the product will be up to the same
level in a few of months time as the current SXDE 1/08.
At the moment the two areas which concern me are how I can do
The preview is absolutely an experiment. Indiana itself is an
experiment. OpenSolaris? Well, I don't know what to call it ;-)
I see Indiana is an experiment well I think it is more than that!
From: Net Talks Webcast Details: Sorting Out Solaris Releases
I thought for a change I would say a Thank You for the latest build.
Installed it on my laptop and I was pleased to see so new features and some
working ones.
My wireless WPA-PSK worked. It did not work on previous releases
A fully functional webserver ready to go (web stack) + GUI. I used
Hi,
I think Tom has spelt the problem out very well. Oracle
will only release a Open(Solaris) x86-64 version when
they have finished all there priority releases and then
depending what demand there is for the product.
I got my reply back from Oracle and now they just point
me to there support
I have been looking into this recently and I got a reply from those Oracle
people, which is not what I was hoping for. Again it is down to the same old
problem of demand for an Application on OpenSolaris/Solaris x86 platform. I
guess it is the same problem the Linux people had a few years ago,
is there a way to configure the ftp server in Solaris in such a way
that users be automatically chdir-ed to their home directory
and that they see it as / ? I don't care if ftpd actually calls
chroot() or not.
I tried to set some option in /etc/ftpd/ftpaccess, but with
miserable
I am finally biting the bullet and ditching my work machine - a 9 year
old Ultra 10 - for a new system I thought I would go for the fastest cpu
on the market. I already have OpenSolaris running on Core™2 Duo box.
It may sound a silly question, since Solaris does run on Quad-Core Intel
Xeon,
Likewise, I haven't seen the Sun One Directory server being able to fully and
completely replace Microsoft Active Directory because it is fully
interoperable with AD, meaning that it can supplant it.
At the end of the day this is better for Sun than Microsoft.
Microsoft don't care about
I have tried this both ways on different revs of Solaris and sometimes I get
the submission button and sometimes I don't.
and .. I don't know why either.
Is there any chance that the submission only appears when you are
running on Solaris 10 11/06 or Developer 5/07 releases.
This seems to
Don't make the same mistake as me and install Flash on a Solaris 9 box.
OK! It does say Solaris 10, but I thought it may work.
Andrew
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Thanks for all the information, but the problem I am having - well not a
problem - just a general question.
What I have done is boot a Intel Core 2 (running Windows) off the latest
OpenSolaris B67 x86 and entered the Singe User Shell straight away.
# isainfo -v
32-bit i386 applications
Now is
I know you may think it is a silly question, but I am unable to find the answer.
OK! We know Sun SPARC chips all run 64 bit OpenSolaris, but which AMD and Intel
cpu can run it as well:
- AMD Opteron run 64bit kernel
- Intel Xeon run 64bit kernel
but what about:
- AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core
After every release someone always ask what is new in it and I think it is a
valid question, which is not always easy to find out. I think it is a little
unfair to pass the buck to one group to keep this up to date, so why don't we
ask all Communities to have a page on there home site to tell
Are you exporting these filesystems or have quotas on them, since I believe
there is a slow boot problem with that!
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
off topic, but how did you manage to install the software on the U10.
I just did the same and it would not install any software pass CD1
I go through the install procedure and it install of the packages from CD 1
and
then reports:
Unable to run launcher without Java
following CDs will not be
I guess another thing to think about is when did the telnetd change, since
Solaris 9 and below do not have this problem. And I read somewhere that Solaris
10 (First release) did not have it.
Did the OpenSolaris community add this bug or was it from Sun and why was it
changed?
Only a
Good question. Let's spin it around a bit, though: if
somebody did enable root logins via telnet on a UNIX
system in this day and age, should they really have
anything to do with UNIX?
You are right that opening root to remote access a machine via any way
(telnet/rsh/ssh) is asking for
it's not completely clear to me how this filesystem
is used and how you are planning to manage your
alternate service, so the following may or may not be
useful...
I will clear up exactly what I was hoping for. Want I wanted is to mirror
2 disks on 2 different machines, so that both disks
My manager asked me if I could a mirror copy of our /var/mail on another
system, just in case the system went down. He suggested that Windows has DFS
(Distributed File System) and I said I would look into it.
Microsoft's DFS is a method for creating another copy of your data and
being able
My manager asked me if I could a mirror copy of our /var/mail on another
system, just in case the system went down. He suggested that Windows has DFS
(Distributed File System) and I said I would look into it.
Over the weekend I thought of CacheFS which comes will solaris which allows you
to
I just had a quick look at /usr/sfw and there are many packages which you can
remove if you wish, since there is about 16000 files made out of 93 packages.
If you don't want it remove it, but at least you have the choice and I find
myself not install as much software from sunfreeware.com as I
Some interesting comments about Single Sign on:
1) One thing which I think we are agreed on is LDAP is the best solution with
some sort of communication with Windows Active Directory.
2) Sun's Directory Server Enterprise Edition and Access Manager is another
solution but I have to say that it
I have just read the UNIX Interoperability in Windows Server 2003 R2 and
after looking at the online demo it looks like we can now import all our NIS
stuff into AD.
It seems that Active Directory can act as a NIS server and can give us a single
password for all us Solaris / Windows
I see that Solaris 10 1/06 has just been released and looking at the
documnetation it looks like it is based on Solaris Express 11/05 (no ZFS). Is
this correct, or is it based in an early version.
I guess the question is when do Sun take the Express Version and turn it into a
full Solaris
53 matches
Mail list logo
