On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:31:23PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Jim Bolin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does opensolaris allow a xenix drive to be mounted? I have an old xenix
drive that people want data off of and it won't boot anymore. I can't find
a xenix install set anywhere so am
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 09:09:20PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, and when did kprobes and ReiserFS integrate?
In Opensolaris? Not at all. In Linux which is probably offtopic
here it's 2004 (kprobes) and 2001 (reiserfs).
___
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 11:59:27AM +, Frank Hofmann wrote:
On the other hand, the request for lsof in Solaris is anything but new,
and the reference to pfiles, the mentioning that lsof does nasty digging
in the kernel's intestines as a reply is neither, and the arguments that
the output
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 09:11:23PM +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
New releases can be provided in distro, but kernel is alwasy based
on some branch of some release branch. Currently they are 4.0s and 4.1s
This may be for the same reasons as with Solaris: they may require specific
changes that
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 12:52:43PM -0700, Alexey Starovoytov wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
That is of course utter bullshit. The Linux kernel doesn't require
a specific gcc version.
I didn't say it requires. I said shipped Linux kernel is always built
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 12:38:27PM +0100, Frank van der Linden wrote:
But, touting the limit is kinda pointless if the current limit is well
below it.. I've never run NetBSD/amd64 on more than 4CPU/16G, and it
might blow up spectacularly when run on 32CPU hardware, should it become
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 03:42:52PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
This practice is used since 1988 and before Microsoft and Linux did something
else, nobody complained.
Linux doesn't allow to eject a CD in use.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 07:36:25PM +0530, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
This practice is used since 1988 and before Microsoft and Linux did
something
else, nobody complained.
It does. Just try a latest 2.6 kernel which has subfs. I works on
SuSE 9.3.
Then the suse folks patched your kernel.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 07:36:25PM +0530, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
It does. Just try a latest 2.6 kernel which has subfs.
There's no subfs in a latest 2.6 kernel. I looked up what subfs is,
and it's a stackable filesystem that is mounted to a mount pointed at
boot time, and then mounts an
You don't seem to have any expertise about linux filesystems, and what
you're writing is both totally offtopic here and completely wrong.
Please let this sub-thread die.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
10 matches
Mail list logo
