Roland Mainz wrote:
Hi!
Today I stumbled over http://blogs.sun.com/olympus/ and
http://blogs.sun.com/samqfs/ (erm, this is not thought as offense
against the QFS or Olympus people but AFAIK group/project blogs should
be in the project-specific blogging areas at opensolaris.org and not at
Roland Mainz wrote:
Hi!
Today I stumbled over http://blogs.sun.com/olympus/ and
http://blogs.sun.com/samqfs/ (erm, this is not thought as offense
against the QFS or Olympus people but AFAIK group/project blogs should
be in the project-specific blogging areas at opensolaris.org and not at
Hi!
Today I stumbled over http://blogs.sun.com/olympus/ and
http://blogs.sun.com/samqfs/ (erm, this is not thought as offense
against the QFS or Olympus people but AFAIK group/project blogs should
be in the project-specific blogging areas at opensolaris.org and not at
blogs.sun.com) ...
somehow this feels not good that products start to have blogs
It can be interesting to meet real people behind a product share their
views from the other side of the fence. For instance, Microsoft's IEBlog
is quite popular. The concept of group blogs is okay, though some
implementation are
Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
somehow this feels not good that products start to have blogs
It can be interesting to meet real people behind a product share their
views from the other side of the fence.
Right... and I don't disagree with that... but somehow the idea that
products start to
Right... and I don't disagree with that... but somehow the idea that
products start to have their own blogs ... sounds... uhm... weired.
I think you're reading it too literally. It is common for groups in
organizations to be named after the product they are working on. So
perhaps when they
So I have the problem that when I blog, I might be doing it on
OpenSolaris, soccer coaching, science fiction, etc.
While that is good in that it shows I have interests outside of work, it
creates many threads of
conversation which it can be hard to navigate through.
I just recently learned
