[osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] OpenGrok, the OpenSolaris.org source browsing tool, is now available for download

2005-11-16 Thread Dan Price
On Tue 15 Nov 2005 at 08:45PM, Derek Cicero wrote: OpenGrok, the open source source browsing tool developed by Chandan B.N and used on OpenSolaris.org is now available for download. OpenGrok is a fast and usable source code search and cross reference engine. It helps you search,

Re: [osol-discuss] Is 'forking' inevitable here too?

2005-11-16 Thread Darren J Moffat
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 19:47, Joerg Schilling wrote: GNU The youngest set of tools (starting around 1986). My current idea is to put them into /usr/sps/* as Linux users may expect them in the same hierarchy as the rest of free software. It may

Re: [osol-discuss] milestone none really means nothing running at all really

2005-11-16 Thread Darren J Moffat
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 03:52, Dennis Clarke wrote: The boot -m milestone=none resulted in this : Booting to milestone none. Requesting System Maintenance Mode (See /lib/svc/share/README for more information.) Console login service(s) cannot run Root password for system maintenance

Re: [osol-discuss] milestone none really means nothing running at all really

2005-11-16 Thread Casper . Dik
-sh: /bin/i386: not found -sh: /usr/sbin/quota: not found -sh: /bin/cat: not found -sh: /bin/mail: not found # # df -ak df: not found # ls ls: not found # pwd /root That looks like you have split / and /usr, right ? And we've long said you shouldn't be doign that :-) Not sure

[osol-discuss] Build 27a community release hits SDLC - Has ZFS!

2005-11-16 Thread Ché Kristo
Hi all, Build 27a has hit the SDLC and it carries ZFS URL: http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=7PartDetailId=Sol-Express_b27-x86-SP-G-BTransactionId=try enjoy!!! This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss

[osol-discuss] Re: milestone none really means nothing running at all really

2005-11-16 Thread Jürgen Keil
Booting to milestone none. Requesting System Maintenance Mode (See /lib/svc/share/README for more information.) Console login service(s) cannot run ... # df -ak df: not found # ls ls: not found # pwd /root okay .. really not much here at all. I may have to leave some bins in a

[osol-discuss] Re: fsck seems to have a few new features in build 26

2005-11-16 Thread Frank Batschulat
Well, the ability to boot so single user mode and then run fsck on the current root slice seems to be something that I have done for a long long time. Well, it wasnt just explicitely pointed out as with the fsck re-write now, however fsck_ufs(1M) warns you since ages: snip WARNINGS The

[osol-discuss] Re: Build 27a community release hits SDLC - Has ZFS!

2005-11-16 Thread Gary Gendel
Super. This is something I am anxious to try. Kudos to all involved. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: fsck seems to have a few new features in build 26

2005-11-16 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 11/16/05, Frank Batschulat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, the ability to boot so single user mode and then run fsck on the current root slice seems to be something that I have done for a long long time. Well, it wasnt just explicitely pointed out as with the fsck re-write now, however

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: milestone none really means nothing running at all really

2005-11-16 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 11/16/05, Jürgen Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Booting to milestone none. Requesting System Maintenance Mode (See /lib/svc/share/README for more information.) Console login service(s) cannot run ... # df -ak df: not found # ls ls: not found # pwd /root okay .. really

Re: [osol-discuss] milestone none really means nothing running at all really

2005-11-16 Thread Darren J Moffat
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 15:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I'm certain our best practices now are something like: / /var- for servers only /export - separate the users/data from the rest. I'd agree with that completely. In fact I'd actually say that on general purpose

Re: [osol-discuss] milestone none really means nothing running at all really

2005-11-16 Thread James Carlson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - you run out of space more quickly because you dividing line will not be correct - hard recoverability issues become impossible with net/cdrom boot - the gain in stability is fairly minimal (a read-only /usr mount mostly increases

Re: [osol-discuss] milestone none really means nothing running at all really

2005-11-16 Thread Rainer Orth
Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 15:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I'm certain our best practices now are something like: / /var- for servers only /export - separate the users/data from the rest. I'd agree with that completely. In

Re: [osol-discuss] App porting forum?

2005-11-16 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alfredo Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erast, Thanks for your offer, but I'm trying to target Sun Solaris distro. Probably for most software developing in Nexenta is the same than developing in Solaris, but for something like xine that is very dependent on the specific versions of various

Re: [osol-discuss] milestone none really means nothing running at all really

2005-11-16 Thread Matthew Simmons
DJM == Darren J Moffat Darren writes: DJM I also tend to have /var/core and /var/crash separate as well but DJM thats because I don't actually want live upgrade to copy the core and DJM crash files over to the new boot environment, because they aren't DJM relevant. DJM

Re: [osol-discuss] fd limit on 32bit solaris i386 box

2005-11-16 Thread Casper . Dik
It would be simple to add a (maybe hidden) flag to the FILE * data structures that tell stdio that the calling program is aware of the new interface because it has been compiled with the new include files. There's always an issue with old libraries and such and FILE *'s being passed around to

Re: [osol-discuss] milestone none really means nothing running at all really

2005-11-16 Thread Darren J Moffat
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 16:21, Matthew Simmons wrote: DJM == Darren J Moffat Darren writes: DJM I also tend to have /var/core and /var/crash separate as well but DJM thats because I don't actually want live upgrade to copy the core and DJM crash files over to the new boot

Re: [osol-discuss] milestone none really means nothing running at all really

2005-11-16 Thread Matthew Simmons
DJM == Darren J Moffat Darren writes: DJM I use to do that but if using dumpadm and coreadm to actually put them DJM else where seemed like a better solution to me - mainly because they DJM have the functionality built in so why not use it. On the other hand, /var/crash is a

Re: [osol-discuss] Build 27a community release hits SDLC - Has ZFS!

2005-11-16 Thread Josip Gracin
Sean Sprague wrote: Build 27a has hit the SDLC and it carries ZFS URL: http://javashoplm.sun.com/ECom/docs/Welcome.jsp?StoreId=7PartDetailId=Sol-Express_b27-x86-SP-G-BTransactionId=try Just when I finished installing and configuring b23 on my Thinkpad R50 (including the perfectly working

Re: [osol-discuss] milestone none really means nothing running at all really

2005-11-16 Thread Darren J Moffat
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 16:43, Matthew Simmons wrote: DJM == Darren J Moffat Darren writes: DJM I use to do that but if using dumpadm and coreadm to actually put them DJM else where seemed like a better solution to me - mainly because they DJM have the functionality built in so

Re: [osol-discuss] milestone none really means nothing running at all really

2005-11-16 Thread Matthew Simmons
DJM == Darren J Moffat Darren writes: DJM Which brings me to very minor grip about the default config of DJM Solaris, it is /var/crash/hostname at the first time you booted DJM which when using DHCP in the default Solaris config can change. Sure DJM I can find out what it is

[osol-discuss] ZFS fun

2005-11-16 Thread Alan Romeril
Hi there, Just got my hands on a copy of Nevada b27 and have started playing with zfs and zpool, and already have run myself into a corner. Is it possible to remove storage from a storage pool without using zpool destroy? Let's say I want to migrate from one storage type to another online, for

Re: [osol-discuss] Build 27a community release hits SDLC - Has ZFS!

2005-11-16 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Josip Gracin wrote: Are changelogs available for Solaris Express releases? Not in full. ON X currently publish changelogs for those bits, but I don't know of any other consolidations that do so yet. See: http://opensolaris.org/os/community/onnv/onnv_putback_logs/

Re: [osol-discuss] ZFS fun

2005-11-16 Thread Jonathan Adams
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 09:06:03AM -0800, Alan Romeril wrote: Hi there, Just got my hands on a copy of Nevada b27 and have started playing with zfs and zpool, and already have run myself into a corner. Is it possible to remove storage from a storage pool without using zpool destroy?

Re: [osol-discuss] ZFS fun

2005-11-16 Thread Jonathan Adams
(CCing zfs-discuss, since it is the better forum) On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 09:06:03AM -0800, Alan Romeril wrote: Hi there, Just got my hands on a copy of Nevada b27 and have started playing with zfs and zpool, and already have run myself into a corner. Is it possible to remove storage from a

Re: [osol-discuss] Build 27a community release hits SDLC - Has ZFS!

2005-11-16 Thread James Carlson
Josip Gracin writes: Are changelogs available for Solaris Express releases? Or do I have to wait for someone from Sun to blog about it? The only open changelogs I know about are in Dan Price's blog. -- James Carlson, KISS Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems / 1

Re: [osol-discuss] Is 'forking' inevitable here too?

2005-11-16 Thread Joerg Schilling
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: very true. dpkg's alternatives is a good thing. Also there are other ways to achive that, i.e. playing with execv() for instance. Did you hack libc to do this? Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin [EMAIL

Re: [osol-discuss] Is 'forking' inevitable here too?

2005-11-16 Thread Erast Benson
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 18:36 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: very true. dpkg's alternatives is a good thing. Also there are other ways to achive that, i.e. playing with execv() for instance. Did you hack libc to do this? No. not yet. But at least we've

Re: [osol-discuss] App porting forum?

2005-11-16 Thread Erast Benson
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 17:09 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: Alfredo Peña [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Erast, Thanks for your offer, but I'm trying to target Sun Solaris distro. Probably for most software developing in Nexenta is the same than developing in Solaris, but for something like

Re: [osol-discuss] App porting forum?

2005-11-16 Thread Joerg Schilling
Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And just to notice, I think compilation of OpenSolaris on Nexenta is very possible, and will be available in Alpha 2 time frame. If you believe this, you did obviously never actually try it out.. Of course, if you delay Alpha 2 for several weeks you

[osol-discuss] Re: newb help

2005-11-16 Thread matt
thanks michelle. i am not really looking for how to write the code, i just want to know the basics of how it works. does anyone happen to know where i can find the solaris 10 zfs file system limitations are? i cant really seem to find it on the sun site. thanks This message posted from

Re: [osol-discuss] App porting forum?

2005-11-16 Thread Erast Benson
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 19:59 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: Erast Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And just to notice, I think compilation of OpenSolaris on Nexenta is very possible, and will be available in Alpha 2 time frame. If you believe this, you did obviously never actually try it

Re: [osol-discuss] fsck seems to have a few new features in build 26

2005-11-16 Thread Daniel Rock
Jonathan Adams schrieb: On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 08:06:06PM -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote: Hold on .. do you mean from the ok prompt ? ok boot -m milestone=none as opposed to ok boot -sv hmmm fascinating ... let me try that right now. Yes; it's a completely minimal boot, with nothing but

[osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] OpenGrok, the OpenSolaris.org source browsing tool, is now available for download

2005-11-16 Thread Andy Tucker
On 11/15/05, Derek Cicero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OpenGrok, the open source source browsing tool developed by Chandan B.N and used on OpenSolaris.org is now available for download. Very cool - this will be a great way to bridge communities (since it's useful to all developers, not just those

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenGrok, the OpenSolaris.org source browsing tool, is now available for download

2005-11-16 Thread Chandan
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 12:13, Andy Tucker wrote: or using Solaris/OpenSolaris). Is this going to get its own discussion list? I already have a couple of (minor) bugs to report, plus some comments and questions. Derek is working on getting project support as per roadmap

[osol-discuss] Build 27 available at www.genunix.org

2005-11-16 Thread Al Hopper
URL:http://www.genunix.org/mirror/index.html Many congrats to team ZFS! Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc, Plano, TX. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: 972.379.2133 Fax: 972.379.2134 Timezone: US CDT OpenSolaris.Org Community Advisory Board (CAB) Member - Apr 2005

[osol-discuss] Re: build 27a on x86 : panic at boot

2005-11-16 Thread alessioc
how did you install it? was it an upgrade or a clean install? i have had a similar problem with b24 http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=2745tstart=0 This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

Re: [osol-discuss] build 27a on x86 : panic at boot

2005-11-16 Thread Ian Collins
Dennis Clarke wrote: diskread: reading beyond end of ramdisk start = 0x2000, size = 0x2000 failed to read superblock diskread: reading beyond end of ramdisk start = 0x8000, size = 0x800 failed to read superblock panic: cannot mount boot archive Press any key to reboot I don't