that's great nat glad you have taken 10 years of our open source work with
linux and are happy with windoze.
Any other way you want to build a lib and then link them and break 10
years of work OZ and get paid for it.
You think you could complicate this build a little more for the people that
actu
of opensource-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: opensource-dev Digest, Vol 78, Issue 26 (Brent Racobs)
>2. Re: opensource-dev Digest, Vol 78, Issue 26 (Darien Caldwell)
>
>
> ---------
On Jan 31, 2017 2:00 PM,
wrote:
> Send opensource-dev mailing list submissions to
> opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.secondlife.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openso
> urce-dev
> or, via email, send a m
autobuild is pretty lost OZ looking at it. It must be the linux part. Oh
whats linux. looking at your 1.1 commits scratch my head. Then looks at
build.sh wonders how that commit could do anything. pretty vacant commit
what am I missing.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:16 AM, <
opensource-dev-requ...@l
At some point your going to have to say good by to Mac OS and Linux. Or
just do what we have been doing for 10 years. Build for the X86_64
I have built the SL viewer standalone many times and kept it up
but the latest changes are so ridiculous pump out code that has no
real meaning for a multi core
