On 2010-10-20, at 18:07, Ricky wrote:
> lol... That comment reminds me of this (tongue-in-cheek,) graphic
> representing the learning curves for a variety of common editors:
> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2004/11/17/code-editor-learning-curves.aspx
Pet peeve time:
I understand the co
On 2010-10-20, at 13:20, malachi wrote:
> For you windows developers who are using Visual Studio, When you type a
> function name and get to the ( point of the function it pops a tip up
> telling you what is needed to complete this function.
The SL editor already has this: you just hover the m
I do sometimes wonder what happened to i, ii, iii, iv, and v, though.
Must be like that "Leonard Part 6" movie Bill Cosby did in the early
80's.
--GC
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 19:45 -0500, Dave Booth wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 18:40, Ponzu wrote:
> > Alas, so many generations of coder who learned vi from
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 19:40 -0400, Ponzu wrote:
> Alas, so many generations of coder who learned vi from someone who
> already didn't know vi.
>
>
> You will note that Google's new keyboard commands are vi commands.
> There is a reason for this.
>
Google... has keyboard commands?
:wq , :i, :q
On 10/20/2010 18:40, Ponzu wrote:
> Alas, so many generations of coder who learned vi from someone who
> already didn't know vi.
>
> You will note that Google's new keyboard commands are vi commands.
> There is a reason for this.
>
same reason that most chat apps commands are IRC commands :) /m
Alas, so many generations of coder who learned vi from someone who already
didn't know vi.
You will note that Google's new keyboard commands are vi commands. There is
a reason for this.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Altair Sythos wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:07:31 -0700
> Ricky wrote:
>
I didn't mean add something that would allow editing in an external
program. It is bad enough on older machines to run SL alone. and opening
multiple programs is not enough. Perhaps tool tips are a bit out of the
way i agree with others that the tooltip can sometimes be annoying. but
instea
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:07:31 -0700
Ricky wrote:
> lol... That comment reminds me of this (tongue-in-cheek,) graphic
> representing the learning curves for a variety of common editors:
> http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2004/11/17/code-editor-learning-curves.aspx
damn awaked my wife laug
lol... That comment reminds me of this (tongue-in-cheek,) graphic
representing the learning curves for a variety of common editors:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/steverowe/archive/2004/11/17/code-editor-learning-curves.aspx
vi indeed... I'm a pico guy myself, but I'll stoop to using
Programmer's Notepa
I will submit my external editor patch to snow storm
On Oct 20, 2010 5:39 PM, "Ponzu" wrote:
Make the script editor use vi.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Ricky wrote:
>
> It used to stay up until cli...
___
Policies and (un)subscribe informati
Make the script editor use vi.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Ricky wrote:
> It used to stay up until clicked on or until certain characters were
> typed... Got in the the way at times, but was quite useful.
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:08 PM, SuezanneC Baskerville
> wrote:
> > I'd be ple
It used to stay up until clicked on or until certain characters were
typed... Got in the the way at times, but was quite useful.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:08 PM, SuezanneC Baskerville
wrote:
> I'd be pleased if the popup tip remained visible somewhere. My short term
> memory is bad, if there are
I have the same problem as Suezanne. When I use the popup is usually for
something longwinded and frequently have to make the popup appear several
times. If the popup would appear automatically and I could hit tab,space or
enter to have it auto complete that would be perfect.
Frans
On Thu, Oct 21
I'd be pleased if the popup tip remained visible somewhere. My short term
memory is bad, if there are many parameters I have to make the popup appear
more than once.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Ricky wrote:
> I think the idea here is to have the popup capable of doing
> auto-completion. Th
I think the idea here is to have the popup capable of doing
auto-completion. This would save a load of time, as well as make it
easier to script, IMHO.
An alternative would be to expand the usefulness of the code insert
dropdown by having it add the parens and properties for events and
functions
On 10/20/2010 13:20, malachi wrote:
> Of all the developers who are working on the client someone has to be
> smart enough to implement this.
>
> For you windows developers who are using Visual Studio, When you type a
> function name and get to the ( point of the function it pops a tip up
> telling
Of all the developers who are working on the client someone has to be
smart enough to implement this.
For you windows developers who are using Visual Studio, When you type a
function name and get to the ( point of the function it pops a tip up
telling you what is needed to complete this func
17 matches
Mail list logo
