https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
Damien Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #29 from Damien Miller
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
Taylor R changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tayt...@gmail.com
--- Comment #28 from Taylor
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #27 from Damien Miller ---
... and I just added support for bare port numbers in
permitlisten/PermitListen:
commit 80e199d6175904152aafc5c297096c3e18297691 (HEAD -> master)
Author: d...@openbsd.org
Date: Tue Jun 19 03:02:17 2018 +0
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #26 from Martin Häcker ---
đ
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
___
openssh-bugs mailing l
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
Damien Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
Damien Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||biagion...@gmail.com
--- Comment #24 from
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #23 from Atony Antony ---
I just found out that my patch incomplete. it need more work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #22 from Atony Antony ---
Created attachment 3153
--> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=3153&action=edit
parse authorized_keys option permitremoteopen="port"
this is great. my first attempt to add parsing authrorized_ke
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
Damien Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2436|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
ms.huan.z...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ms.huan.z...@gmail.com
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
william.mar...@power-lan.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||william.mar...@power-lan.co
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #18 from b...@dhampir.no ---
I have this exact same use case in the duped bug. Please integrate?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
b...@dhampir.no changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||b...@dhampir.no
--- Comment #17 from b..
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #16 from Martin Häcker ---
Maybe they need all he energy they have to move to a better integrated
issue tracker and code hosting service that also tracks pull requests
as a first class object?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #15 from er...@rohlicek.at ---
Not sure why the maintainers let a security-enhancing small patch rot
here for several years.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #14 from bygon_wiggle ---
Are there plans to merge the patch
(https://github.com/antonyantony/openssh/) back into openssh?
I did not find a open or closed pull request with this patch in
https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable
--
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #13 from Atony Antony ---
Created attachment 3054
--> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=3054&action=edit
7.5p1 permitremoteopen patch
up request to update the here is one for 7.5p1 If you need a patch for
CentOS 7.3+ dr
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #12 from er...@rohlicek.at ---
Greetings, I can also only re-affirm the usefulness of such a
restriction possibility.
Primary concern here is restriction on which listen ports the client
can bind to.
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
rgm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ssh@spamgourmet.com
--- Comment #11 from rgm -
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #10 from er...@rohlicek.at ---
This would also be highly beneficial for the local setup here.
PermitOpen supports local portforward restrictions, but remote PFs
cannot be restricted in vanialla OpenSSH at the moment.
Please incorporat
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
er...@rohlicek.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||er...@rohlicek.at
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #9 from Jean-Noel COUERON ---
Please add this feature that's exactly what i need.
sincerely
Jean-Noel
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
Jean-Noel COUERON changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jn.coue...@power-lan.com
--
You are
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
Sascha Silbe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sascha-openssh-bugs@silbe.o
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
git...@kalvdans.no-ip.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||git...@kalvdans.no-ip.org
--
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
Peter Tripp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pe...@chartio.com
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
Peter �strand changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||astr...@lysator.liu.se
--
You are receiv
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #8 from Martin Häcker ---
I would like to add that we identified a possible security risk by not
being able to restrict the remote port forwarding.
Our use case is that we want to give one customer the ability to safely
(via ssh tunne
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
Robert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rhb...@rbu.sh
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
Martin Häcker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spamfaen...@gmx.de
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
Marcus Popp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@mpopp.eu
--- Comment #7 from Marcus Po
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #6 from ja...@coppermoth.com ---
What needs to happen to get this patch into master? I have been using
this and it seems a sensible, low risk addition
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
Y
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #5 from Atony Antony ---
Created attachment 2517
--> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2517&action=edit
tested on 6.7p1 and applies on cvs current too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone o
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
ja...@coppermoth.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ja...@coppermoth.com
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
Atony Antony changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ant...@phenome.org
--- Comment #3 from Ato
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
desc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||desc...@gmail.com
--
You are receivin
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
LluĂs Gili changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tictac...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #2 from proctor ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Some options:
>
> 1. Separate option
>
> PermitROpen 2000 2001 2002 3000-3999
>
> 2. Reuse PermitOpen, but treat numbers without ':' as -R port numbers
>
> PermitOpen 127.0.0.1:1234 20
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
Damien Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@mindrot.org
--- Comment #1 from Dami
39 matches
Mail list logo
