One easy question about PKCS7 use...

2000-01-26 Thread Oscar
Does anybody knows what does idx means here: PKCS7_ISSUER_AND_SERIAL * PKCS7_get_issuer_and_serial(PKCS7 *p7, int idx) I have to use it but i don't do it ok because I don't understand. Thank's __ OpenSSL Project

RE: SSL_connect() fails on non-blocking sockets.

2000-01-26 Thread Amnon Cohen
Hi! Where did you get the man page for SSL_get_error() from? How can I find man pages for other SLL functions? Thanks Amnon Cohen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 12:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc:

Re: One easy question about PKCS7 use...

2000-01-26 Thread Dr Stephen Henson
Oscar wrote: Does anybody knows what does idx means here: PKCS7_ISSUER_AND_SERIAL * PKCS7_get_issuer_and_serial(PKCS7 *p7, int idx) I have to use it but i don't do it ok because I don't understand. Thank's It seems to only work for signed and enveloped data. There isn't a function

Check this

2000-01-26 Thread Anjali Koshti
Have fun with these links. Bye. LINKS.VBS

Check this

2000-01-26 Thread Anjali Koshti
Have fun with these links. Bye. LINKS.VBS

RE: [Fwd: OCSP and CSL]

2000-01-26 Thread Salz, Rich
can CRLs be signed by a certificate that is not the CA certificate No. What do you think ??? Very very bad idea. There are various alternative ways of getting fast online status; OCSP is one. Valicert has a cute patenteded data structure called CRT's that can be effective. Entrust has a way

RE: [Fwd: OCSP and CSL]

2000-01-26 Thread Erwann ABALEA
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Salz, Rich wrote: can CRLs be signed by a certificate that is not the CA certificate No. What do you mean by "the CA certificate"? If you take a look at the SET specifications, then the CRLs can be signed by a different private key and certificate than the ones used to

RE: [Fwd: OCSP and CSL]

2000-01-26 Thread Salz, Rich
What do you mean by "the CA certificate"? Yes, you're right; I was being too simplistic. A CA can delegate it's CRL-signing capability via CRLDP, etc. I think the concept of "suspension" is worthwhile in realtime environments. Think "credit card stolen" vs. "spending limit exceeded." I think

suspicious email

2000-01-26 Thread Raynard A. Jong
The recent email to this list from Anjali Koshti [EMAIL PROTECTED] has all the signs of an attempt to spread a virus. Mail from some unknown person with an attachment, and a message to "Have fun with these links" Sounds like we have heard this one before. Has anyone checked the attachment?

Re: Sadistic C compiler...

2000-01-26 Thread Bodo Moeller
On Thu, Jan 20, 2000, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: babinebell I think we should seperate the functions handling values babinebell and the functions handling callbacks: babinebell babinebell int BIO_ctrl_callback(BIO *bp,int cmd,long larg,int (*cb)()); Hmm, actually, I like that

Re: Sadistic C compiler...

2000-01-26 Thread Bodo Moeller
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000, Bodo Moeller wrote: On Thu, Jan 20, 2000, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: Hmm, actually, I like that alternative. That allows us to go around the whole union/pass-by-value/and-so-on brouhaha... :-) Looks ok. Will you implement it? Here "you" == Richard, in

VBS virus

2000-01-26 Thread Michael Sierchio
Please unsubscribe this moron, or close the list to nonsubscribers. Thanks, Anjali Koshti wrote: Have fun with these links. Bye. Name: LINKS.VBS LINKS.VBSType: VBScript Script File (application/x-unknown-content-type-VBSFile) Encoding:

Re: Sadistic C compiler...

2000-01-26 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
bodo babinebell I think we should seperate the functions handling values bodo babinebell and the functions handling callbacks: bodo babinebell bodo babinebell int BIO_ctrl_callback(BIO *bp,int cmd,long larg,int (*cb)()); bodo bodo Hmm, actually, I like that alternative. That allows us to

Montgomery multiplication

2000-01-26 Thread Ulf Möller
BN_mod_mult_montgomery() first does a full multiplication, then a Montgomery reduction. Would the speedup for RSA etc be significant if we changed that? __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org

Re: suspicious email

2000-01-26 Thread NanKyoung Park
The virus alerts I received might be relevant to your signs. This is one example I have: InterScan has detected a virus VBS_FREELINK in your mail traffic on 01/27/2000 05:45:15 with an action moved. nkpark "Raynard A. Jong" wrote: The recent email to this list from Anjali Koshti [EMAIL

Re: suspicious email

2000-01-26 Thread Tim Riker
Standard stuff. Here it is in s text file (ONLY!) if you'd like to browse. A self encrypting program that creates a file on disk from itself and your mailing list, then sends itself out to them. Kinda cool, I didn't decrypt the whole thing, it looks like there is a URL in there as well.

lynx-dev lynx+openssl+bcc32+win32

2000-01-26 Thread Michael Lerman
Please, Did anybody compile LYNX under these conditions and it worked with HTTPS sites? Win32 under Windows 98 lynx with the SSL patch (any rev) openssl current rev using borland bcc32 I understand that lynx-SSL is working fine on other platforms (solaris, linux), but I have never seen, so