Re: cvs commit: openssl/demos/engines/rsaref rsaref.c

2002-08-11 Thread Ben Laurie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Index: rsaref.c === RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/demos/engines/rsaref/rsaref.c,v retrieving revision 1.5 retrieving revision 1.5.2.1 diff -u -r1.5 -r1.5.2.1 --- rsaref.c

Re: cvs commit: openssl/util mkerr.pl

2002-08-11 Thread Ben Laurie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: bodo02-Aug-2002 13:38:16 Modified:.Tag: OpenSSL-engine-0_9_6-stable CHANGES Configure Makefile.org PROBLEMS STATUS config crypto Tag: OpenSSL-engine-0_9_6-stable cryptlib.h mem.c ssl

Re: cvs commit: openssl/util mkerr.pl

2002-08-11 Thread Bodo Moeller
Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As noted elsewhere, I really object to returning internal errors! It makes no sense to attempt to continue after the impossible has occurred. If we could be absolutely sure that these events are strictly impossible, then it wouldn't make a difference if we call

Re: Question about the latest security patch - malicious usage

2002-08-11 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Jeffrey Altman wrote: The answer to your questions is 'yes'. As I understand it, the patches were released as they are for the time being because it is better to crash your application then allow the attacker to compromise your computer. New patches will have to be released to

OPENSSL slowness

2002-08-11 Thread James Shelby
I've recently been using OpenSSL to test performance on a cluster solution I am designing and discovered some strange results. On a pentium II 333 system I can do 2,700,000 des computations per minute but on a 64bit 400 Mhz Ultra Sparc can only do 2,400,000 per minute. Being the Ultrasparc is

Re: OPENSSL slowness

2002-08-11 Thread James Shelby
My first thought was the same. Which brought up another interesting questionthe 32bit Pentium II 333 is still faster than the UltraSparc 400. I am running Solaris 9 in 64bit mode and used the default for the latest Openssl96g. I get 2,700,000 Des calculations per minute on the Pentium and

Re: OPENSSL slowness

2002-08-11 Thread David Schwartz
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 17:54:49 -0700 (PDT), James Shelby wrote: My first thought was the same. Which brought up another interesting questionthe 32bit Pentium II 333 is still faster than the UltraSparc 400. Frankly, I don't find this surprising. A RISC CPU would likely be slower

what the difference between openssl and openssl engine

2002-08-11 Thread Wang, LiJie
Title: what the difference between openssl and openssl engine hi, forks, I am a new comer to openssl , I have navigated www.openssl.org site and can not get the answer. if I want to make a application using ssl , which one should I use? and may I just include the ssl.h(*.lib and other

Re: what the difference between openssl and openssl engine

2002-08-11 Thread Black Jack
Title: what the difference between "openssl" and "openssl engine" Hey, Little guy You should read the all the old post before you ask any questions. the difference between openssl and openssl-engine is the last one support hardware encryption. - Original Message -

FAQ is missing

2002-08-11 Thread Ken Hirsch
The contents of http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html are missing. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List

Re: FAQ is missing

2002-08-11 Thread Matthew Hannigan
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:55:17PM -0400, Ken Hirsch wrote: The contents of http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html are missing. Known bug. I think they'd like some volunteers :-) Matt __ OpenSSL Project