This doesn't belong in the bugs database, so I'm killing this ticket.
Please resend that mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Nov 13 09:17:09 2002]:
Hi there.
I am wondering if there is an Apache + SSL for win32 for Apache
1.3.27
I have searched almost everywhere and have
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:04:17PM +0100, Frédéric Giudicelli via RT wrote:
Well IETF didn't answer...
I'm guessing that M$ is wrong, that would not be the first time, howerver
the real question now, is how do you contact M$, the report the bug, the guy
I was in contact with, is:
krish
Hi *,
I've got a short question: Is it possible to include macros
'#define EVP_PKEY_get0_EC_KEY(a) ((a)-pkey.eckey)' etc. in
evp.h ?
Regards,
Nils
PS: In case there are no objections, here's a patch:
--- openssl-SNAP-2002/crypto/evp/evp.h Mon Aug 12 11:01:02 2002
+++
Steve answered with instructions on how to do this. This ticket is
thereby resolved.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Nov 12 17:18:26 2002]:
Hi,
Situation:
==
1.) Call: pCipher=EVP_get_cipherbyname(RC2-CBC)
2.) Call: EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init(ec_ctx)
3.) Call:
This was resolved a while ago by disabling crypt() entirely. If you
wish to use an OpenSSL function, use DES_crypt() instead.
This ticket is now resolved.
--
Richard Levitte
__
OpenSSL Project
Since we still haven't heard anything, I'm making this ticket
stalled.
[jaenicke - Fri Oct 18 15:37:32 2002]:
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Aug 2 17:50:30 2002]:
While compiling openssl-engine-0.9.6e as 64bit on Solaris 8
using gcc3.1,
I get the following error when performing 'make
FYI: I've built mod_ssl-2.8.12 with Apache 1.3.27 on my win2k box , go to
http://www.modssl.org/source/ and have a look
good luck
- Original Message -
From: Gagan Walia via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 3:17 AM
Subject: [openssl.org #339]
Well IETF didn't answer...
I'm guessing that M$ is wrong, that would not be the first time, howerver
the real question now, is how do you contact M$, the report the bug, the guy
I was in contact with, is:
krish shenoy[MS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
He claims that M$ is right, I guess I'll let you big guys
In message 03f201c28a97$38a075d0$0200a8c0@station1 on Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:02:41
+0100, Frédéric Giudicelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups I'm guessing that M$ is wrong, that would not be the first time, howerver
groups the real question now, is how do you contact M$, the report the bug, the guy
Applied and committed. This ticket is now resolved.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Aug 21 03:59:19 2002]:
On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:
In message Pine.BSF.4.21.0208151853170.45263-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 15 Aug 2002 19:17:27 -0700 (PDT),
Doug Kaufman
Politeness is always better, especially in deadend conversations, like
those, you know, you're wrong ! no it's you who is wrong !
Althoug I'll be tempted to think that MS is particullary good at this.
:)
Well I hope MS will be able to get into an adult argumentation, I think it's
mostly about the
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Frédéric Giudicelli wrote:
Well I hope MS will be able to get into an adult argumentation, I think it's
mostly about the comprehension of the RFC, since it's really not clear the
way IETF expresses it.
The best solution would be that one of you big people, contact IETF,
I've been very pleasantly surprised, in the last few months, at the
responsiveness of MS support people and developers whom I have
encountered by submitting support requests related to Kerberos and
X.509. If someone would turn down the flame-meter a notch or two and
construct a concise document
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Index: t_x509.c
===
RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/crypto/asn1/t_x509.c,v
retrieving revision 1.31
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -r1.31 -r1.32
--- t_x509.c2002/08/07
Good catch, thanks! I just applied a change.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 13 Nov 2002 20:04:19
+0100, Nils Larsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
nlarsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nlarsch ...
nlarschIndex: t_x509.c
nlarsch
Hi,
I have a client program using Openssl to send request
to and receive response from a web server. SSL_read hangs if the web server
sends the following headers.
The following is the
header dump without SSL. I think the problem is the separator 0d 0a 0d 0a
between the two block of
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:53:34AM -0800, Lin Ma wrote:
I have a client program using Openssl to send request to and receive
response from a web server. SSL_read hangs if the web server sends the
following headers.
The following is the header dump without SSL. I think the problem is the
As we're starting up our release process again, we'd need to have as
many as possible test the latest snapshots for us. I can personally
cover Debian GNU/Linux on i386.
--
0.9.6h:
One of the upcoming releases will be 0.9.6h (basically to fix all bugs
that have been
I applied the required changed from 0.9.7-stable.
This ticket is now resolved.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Aug 18 12:30:48 2002]:
Here is some info on this subject
In crypto/rand/rand_win.c
RegQueryValueEx(HKEY_PERFORMANCE_DATA, Global, ...
is called. This call lock registry access
Please try an 0.9.6 snapshot, and tell us if that helped.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Aug 20 08:44:07 2002]:
I'm attempting to biuld openSSL on a Mac OS X Server 1.2v3 system
a/k/a Rhapsody.
Apple's cc version cc-783.1, based on gcc version 2.7.2.1
All goes well until the link step when I
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Aug 22 08:48:58 2002]:
I'm building OpenSSL 0.9.6g on MacOS 9, using the CodeWarrior 8
compiler.
I've found three minor compilation problems.
In MacSocket.cp MacSocket.h, the buffer parameter for
MacSocket_send
is declared void * when it should be const void *.
Hi,
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Oct 10 20:39:27 2002]:
2. Failure!
Has to do with selftest.pl looking for a last line in maketest.log
for
platform name. May be related to other issues shown below.
3. make: Makefile.ssl: line 238: Warning -- FSUM9433 Duplicate
entry
There have been some changes lately, so could you try the latest
0.9.7 snapshot and see if that works better?
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Aug 28 21:40:37 2002]:
Hi,
I have a problem with `make test' on Irix 6.5.15 (cc used):
NIST curve P-384 -- Generator:
x =
OK, it's been some time, I haven't heard anything about this. So,
I'll assume all is well, and resolve this ticket.
If there are any more problems with COMP_zlib, don't hesitate to
send in a new bug report.
[levitte - Fri Oct 4 15:19:38 2002]:
[jaenicke - Tue Sep 10 10:15:16 2002]:
The actual bug in this ticket has been fixed. However, it also
contains a proposal on a generalised modes hack, which is a different
matter. Therefore, instead of simply resolving this ticket, I'm
changing the milestone keyword from 0.9.7 to 0.9.8.
--
Richard Levitte
Please try the latest 0.9.6 snapshot, there's been some work done on
the VxWorks parts.
I'll kill this ticket. If you find bugs in the snapshot, please
file a new bug report.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Oct 21 09:02:54 2002]:
Hi All,
I want to port to openssl 0.9.6g onto VxWorks,but I don't
6.2.2. Record compression and decompression
[snip snip] The compression algorithm translates a
TLSPlaintext structure into a TLSCompressed structure. Compression
functions are initialized with default state information whenever a
connection state is made active.
The connection is active
I don't understand. Please show me what change is needed.
Some of the lines in the file end with LF (or maybe it was CR; I've
forgotten), others end with CRLF. And it appears that CodeWarrior
gets used to the one-byte ending, so \CRLF in a macro is interpreted
as an escaped CR followed by an
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Nov 14 01:27:18 2002]:
The fix is to change all the line endings to any of CR, LF, or
CRLF.
OK, this is weird. I've now looked pretty thoroughly at that file,
including the change history. It hasn't changed since February 3rd
2000. There are no CRs, only LFs as
Is this still an issue, even if testing the latest snapshot? If
not, I will consider this ticket resolved.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu May 30 19:28:13 2002]:
Hi,
Just wanted you to know that I'm still having problems with DER
format
certificates. A more thorough inspection turned up
I just committed a fix. Please test tomorrows snapshot.
This ticket is now resolved.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Oct 18 14:43:31 2002]:
Hi.
I am using OpenSSL 0.9.6g under Windows NT. I would like to report
that OpenSSL does NOT read the last line of the conf file if eol
(cr) is not present.
I believe your understanding is incorrect. i2d_X509() should, and
does, return the length of the result. i2d_X509_fp() and
i2d_X509_bio() are different in that respect.
This ticket is now resolved.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Nov 1 08:53:47 2002]:
Hi,
I'm running openssl-0.9.6g (on
32 matches
Mail list logo
