SMS wrote:
I don't have this problem.
show process /case_lookup /parse_style
Are you having trouble because of /parse_style = extended or
/case_lookup = sensitive?
troika-jj) show process /case_lookup /parse_style
26-APR-2010 08:45:08.19 User: JOUKJProcess ID: 23A0191B
[seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Mon Apr 26 11:04:29 2010]:
You're right. The loop was written in the assumption that the control
variable in the for loop can become -1. Since the variable type was
changed to unsigned long, that didn't work anymore and my fix also
didn't correct
On Apr 26, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
[seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Mon Apr 26 11:04:29 2010]:
You're right. The loop was written in the assumption that the control
variable in the for loop can become -1. Since the variable type was
changed to unsigned long, that
From: Jouk Jansen jo...@hrem.nano.tudelft.nl
Parse Style: Extended
Case Lookup: Blind
So I assumed it was because of the extended parse style.
Never assume. ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desk_Set Everyone
needs to see this movie.)
My next guess would be that you have some CRTL
An application that only includes openssl/ssl.h from OpenSSL
1.0.0 and doesn't use winsock.h will run into problems on Windows,
since the dtls1.h header file includes the winsock.h header file long
after the ossl_typ.h header file was loaded.
The latter includes a couple of #undefs needed to work
On 4/26/2010 1:18 PM, Mounir IDRASSI via RT wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds the /Zi switch to CFLAG in the debug configuration in
order to permit stepping inside OpenSSL code during debug sessions.
It applied to the latest snapshots of 1.0.0 and 0.9.8 source trees.
It should be in base_cflags,
On 4/26/2010 1:18 PM, Mounir IDRASSI via RT wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds the /Zi switch to CFLAG in the debug configuration in
order to permit stepping inside OpenSSL code during debug sessions.
It applied to the latest snapshots of 1.0.0 and 0.9.8 source trees.
It should be in base_cflags,
Hello,
As previously noted on this mailing list, the AES performance (without
AES-NI) of v1.0.o on Intel Westmere chips seems a bit slow. In addition,
RC4 seems a bit slow compared to previous Intel chips.
I've included below the speed output for several versions of OpenSSL for
comparison. For
M.-A. Lemburg via RT wrote:
An application that only includes openssl/ssl.h from OpenSSL
1.0.0 and doesn't use winsock.h will run into problems on Windows,
since the dtls1.h header file includes the winsock.h header file long
after the ossl_typ.h header file was loaded.
What about to define
M.-A. Lemburg via RT wrote:
An application that only includes openssl/ssl.h from OpenSSL
1.0.0 and doesn't use winsock.h will run into problems on Windows,
since the dtls1.h header file includes the winsock.h header file long
after the ossl_typ.h header file was loaded.
What about to define
10 matches
Mail list logo