Matt,
I have looked through the APIs. Will have to experiment with them somewhen
later to see how well they will perform, but from theoretical point of view
I am a bit scared of having 2 fds (and one ucontext) for every job in a
pool. It seems like this could be a bit of burden in event-loop
This ticket can be closed. The fix is in master.
Regards,
Dmitry
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Dmitry Sobinov via RT
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve created a pull request with simple changes to support two new AEAD
> profiles for DTLS-SRTP.
>
>
This ticket can be closed. The fix is in master.
Regards,
Dmitry
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Dmitry Sobinov via RT
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve created a pull request with simple changes to support two new AEAD
> profiles for DTLS-SRTP.
>
>
In our review, the code is correct and there is no leak. Please provide a patch
against the current release if you think otherwise.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
-
This has been fixed. Still some work to do for UEFI, but that will be separate
RT's and/or PR's.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
-
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3964
Please log in as guest
fixed with 6c884ed. thanks!
we also bad code style (plaintext private keys) and the netscape_cert routines.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
-
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3461
Please log
fixed in 6c884ed. also added more words about "use the safer routine
err_string_eror_n" :)
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
-
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2890
Please log in as guest with
fixed in 6c884ed by removing the "see also" to non-existant pages. some aren't
appropriate for public docs, and some still need to be written, but at least
the docs are accurate now.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
fixed in master with 0ae9e2926654657862e104a111a4e3028b0be8f6 thanks!
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
-
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4291
Please log in as guest with password guest if
Hi,
Got suggestion from Viktor Szakats (https://github.com/vszakats) concerning
OpenSSL build errors using MinGW-W64 with -std=c11 parameter:
==
[snip]
The error details indicate that some source code is not compliant with the C11
standard
Hi,
[-help] option in most of the commands documentation was missing and in
ciphers and rehash commands it was wrongly specified as [-h], which is not
considered as a valid option.
I have create the below pull request with the changes. Please have a look.
fixed in master with 6c884ed thanks!
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
-
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4260
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
fixed in master with 6c884ed thank you!
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
-
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4240
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 03:04 +, Rich Salz via RT wrote:
> So guys, sorry for dropping the ball. Where are we on this now?
Dropping rt@ since the OPENSSL_NO_STDIO build is actually solved now so
RT#3964 looks like it can be closed. I'm choosing to interpret your
question in the wider sense of
can you make a PR (separate from the one you have for UEFI) that does the right
thing? Or attach it to this ticket?
I've kinda lost track :(
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4175
Please log in as guest with password
Can you re-org the patch so that it doesn't break into the middle if a compound
statement? (across the else)
thanks.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4087
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 17:31 +, Salz, Rich via RT wrote:
> And update the PR to say that it also closes this ticket :)
Well, it can be a separate PR if the first is already merged...
--
dwmw2
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4175
Please log in as guest with
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 17:31 +, Salz, Rich via RT wrote:
> And update the PR to say that it also closes this ticket :)
Well, it can be a separate PR if the first is already merged...
--
dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To
OpenSSL 1.1.0 produces the error
SSL_CTX_set_mode.pod:101: Unknown command paragraph "=="
during "make install".
It looks like line 101 is indeed an unintended addition introduced by
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bc8857bf70f5428bc2f0d26162ed59e3abb11fb1
The error does
we updated the doc in commit 724a1d2 for master.
closing ticket.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1596
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe:
fixed in commit 0dc2255 thanks
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4292
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe:
And update the PR to say that it also closes this ticket :)
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4175
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 17:20 +, Rich Salz via RT wrote:
> can you make a PR (separate from the one you have for UEFI) that does
> the right
> thing? Or attach it to this ticket?
> I've kinda lost track :(
Oops, forgot this one in the set of patches I lined up today. Will add
it.
--
dwmw2
Matt,
I have looked through the APIs. Will have to experiment with them somewhen
later to see how well they will perform, but from theoretical point of view
I am a bit scared of having 2 fds (and one ucontext) for every job in a
pool. It seems like this could be a bit of burden in event-loop
fixed in master (not worth backporting) commit 2b52de9
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
--
Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4070
Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted
--
openssl-dev mailing list
To unsubscribe:
On 05/02/16 22:42, Fedor Indutny wrote:
> Matt,
>
> I have looked through the APIs. Will have to experiment with them
> somewhen later to see how well they will perform, but from theoretical
> point of view I am a bit scared of having 2 fds (and one ucontext) for
> every job in a pool. It seems
On 05/02/16 22:42, Fedor Indutny wrote:
> Matt,
>
> I have looked through the APIs. Will have to experiment with them
> somewhen later to see how well they will perform, but from theoretical
> point of view I am a bit scared of having 2 fds (and one ucontext) for
> every job in a pool. It seems
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Matt Caswell wrote:
>
>
> On 05/02/16 22:42, Fedor Indutny wrote:
> > Matt,
> >
> > I have looked through the APIs. Will have to experiment with them
> > somewhen later to see how well they will perform, but from theoretical
> > point of view I
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Matt Caswell wrote:
>
>
> On 05/02/16 22:42, Fedor Indutny wrote:
> > Matt,
> >
> > I have looked through the APIs. Will have to experiment with them
> > somewhen later to see how well they will perform, but from theoretical
> > point of view I
29 matches
Mail list logo