On 2016-08-11 18:04:41 [+0200], Hubert Kario wrote:
> On Thursday, 11 August 2016 13:50:53 CEST Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2016-08-11 11:34:24 [+0200], Hubert Kario wrote:
> > > it all depends on the environment, in some renegotiation is completely
> > > unnecessary (public HTTP
Hi,
> I have no time to check with debugger now,
Then no progress will be made. Problem needs to be identified first, and
since similar problem was identified earlier, I'd have to insist on
confirmation whether or not it's the same.
> but I do not think it is caused by assembler,
> because,
> -
On 11/08/16 13:29, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
>> ( cd test; \
>> SRCTOP=../. \
>> BLDTOP=../. \
>> PERL="perl" \
>> EXE_EXT= \
>> OPENSSL_ENGINES=.././engines \
>> perl .././test/run_tests.pl test_afalg )
>> ../test/recipes/30-test_afalg.t ..
>> 1..1
>> ALG_PERR:
On Thursday, 11 August 2016 13:50:53 CEST Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2016-08-11 11:34:24 [+0200], Hubert Kario wrote:
> > it all depends on the environment, in some renegotiation is completely
> > unnecessary (public HTTP servers without client certificate based
> > authentication), in
Hello,
I have no time to check with debugger now,
but I do not think it is caused by assembler,
because,
- gcc-5.4.0 with gas (GNU Binutils) 2.27
- cc (Solaris developerstudio12.5) with /usr/ccs/bin/as
have the same result (see openssl.org #4642 also).
perl version which I use is v5.24.0.
> ( cd test; \
> SRCTOP=../. \
> BLDTOP=../. \
> PERL="perl" \
> EXE_EXT= \
> OPENSSL_ENGINES=.././engines \
> perl .././test/run_tests.pl test_afalg )
> ../test/recipes/30-test_afalg.t ..
> 1..1
> ALG_PERR: afalg_fin_cipher_aio: io_read failed : Bad address
>
Hi,
> make test stops on Solaris10 x64.
>
>
> % ./Configure solaris64-x86_64-gcc
>
> % make
> % make test
>:
> ../test/recipes/01-test_abort.t ok
> ../test/recipes/01-test_sanity.t ... ok
> ../test/recipes/01-test_symbol_presence.t .. ok
>
> The following change introduced build problems:
>
>> +if (vec[1]&0x8) OPENSSL_sparcv9cap_P[0] |= SPARCV9_VIS4;
>
> ... here we use vec[1], so the compiler warns:
>
> crypto/sparcv9cap.c:179:20: warning: array subscript is above array
> bounds [-Warray-bounds]
>
On 2016-08-11 11:34:24 [+0200], Hubert Kario wrote:
> it all depends on the environment, in some renegotiation is completely
> unnecessary (public HTTP servers without client certificate based
> authentication), in others just client-initiated renegotiation is needed
> (typical configuration
On Tuesday, 9 August 2016 21:51:32 CEST Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2016-08-09 19:26:44 [+], Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 09:18:58PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > I don't really know what I am supposed to do with this information. Do
> > > you
10 matches
Mail list logo