Hi Tomas and All,
On 1/16/2012 at 11:31 PM, in message 20120116163148.4f325...@redhat.com,
Tomas Hoger tho...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:04:33 -0700 Guan Jun He wrote:
It seems you're trying to address more than just CVE-2011-1473 via
this patch, which results in a fairly
On 1/16/2012 at 11:31 PM, in message 20120116163148.4f325...@redhat.com,
Tomas Hoger tho...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:04:33 -0700 Guan Jun He wrote:
It seems you're trying to address more than just CVE-2011-1473 via
this patch, which results in a fairly large patch. Why
Hi Tomas,
Thanks for your reply!
On 1/10/2012 at 08:12 PM, in message 20120110131229.7ede5...@redhat.com,
Tomas Hoger tho...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Guanjun!
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 20:35:02 -0700 Guan Jun He wrote:
I have just produced a patch against the upstream HEAD version, to
seek
On 12/12/2011 at 11:35 AM, in message
4ee5e6e60216b...@novprvlin0050.provo.novell.com, Guan Jun He
g...@suse.com wrote:
Hi,
I have just produced a patch against the upstream HEAD version,
to seek a way to fight against DoS attack in openssl itself,
the logic is simple, get client's
Hi,
I have just produced a patch against the upstream HEAD version,
to seek a way to fight against DoS attack in openssl itself,
the logic is simple, get client's ip address in BIO layer,
and send this info to upper SSL layer; In SSL layer,
according to the client ip and control policy to do
!
Guanjun
On 11/21/2011 at 05:49 PM, in message 4ECA1E9C.19D : 22 : 21801, Guan Jun
He
wrote:
Hi,
I have just produced a patch against the upstream HEAD version, to seek a
way to against DoS attack in openssl itself,
the logic is simple, get client's ip addressin BIO layer
On 11/15/2011 at 10:42 PM, in message 2015154237.7dca96f4@laverne,
Hanno
Böckha...@hboeck.de wrote:
Am Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:48:28 -0700
schrieb Guan Jun He g...@suse.com:
Add a switch to renegotiation, so that renegotiation can be
controled by program. And it provides a way
Hello,
Add a switch to renegotiation, so that renegotiation can be controled by
program.
And it provides a way to programmer to implement some sort of custom throttling.
Basically, this patch is produced with the background of CVE-2011-1473,
the DoS against renegotiation.You guys must have
On 6/10/2011 at 09:35 PM, in message 20110610133552.ga26...@panix.com,
Thor
Lancelot Simon t...@panix.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 01:01:49PM +0200, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
There is SSL_OP_NO_COMPRESSION.
In that case, the suggestion to provide a config file setting for
Thanks a lot for your reply!
On 6/8/2011 at 09:42 PM, in message 20110608134254.ga6...@panix.com, Thor
Lancelot Simon t...@panix.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 10:58:20PM -0600, Guan Jun He wrote:
Hi, Openssl Developpers:
We have a platform with cryptographic hardware,and we try
Hi, Openssl Developpers:
We have a platform with cryptographic hardware,and we try to take advantage
of the platform's hardware cryptographic features.But openSSL compresses data
before the encryption, having a massive performance impact(throughput decrease,
CPU load increase) on platforms
在 11:15 下午 的 5/25/2011 上，在讯息
20110525151556.ga5...@panix.com 中，Thor Lancelot Simon t...@panix.com
写入： On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 07:45:34PM -0600, Guan Jun He wrote:
? 10:23 ?? ? 5/24/2011 ?
20110524142324.ga29...@panix.com ??Thor Lancelot Simon t...@panix.com
??? On Tue, May 24, 2011
在 10:23 下午 的 5/24/2011 上，在讯息
20110524142324.ga29...@panix.com 中，Thor Lancelot Simon t...@panix.com
写入： On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 05:10:03PM +0800, GuanJun He wrote:
Hi,
This is a patch to add a switch to openssl's compression
methords(if compression methords are configured to compile in,
Dear everyone
I got the openssl-0.9.8k package from openssl.org, then I run the command
'./Configure --test-sanity',and I got the following error,
g...@macintyre:~/project/stable/openssl-0.9.8k ./Configure --test-sanity
==
14 matches
Mail list logo
