Re: Already generated files are not generated a second time because

Hi, You should only have to modify objects.txt, the others are all updated from it. That's the point, the others are not updated if all the files have the same date. Yes, make completely relies on dates to decide what files need to be generated and which ones are up-to-date.

Re: Help crash on IO_proc_close/ CRYPTO_free !

Hi, Core 1 -- (gdb) bt #0  0x4021e76e in pclose () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1  0x4021e548 in _IO_proc_close () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2  0x400b4772 in CRYPTO_free (str=0x0) at mem.c:380 (gdb) And if I read that backtrace in the correct direction, Sorry to interrupt, but

Re: [openssl.org #1753] snapshot 20081003 broke mingw build

Hi, 5. Added -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN and drop the conflict undef of x509.h While I don't mind having to compile the library itself with special flags, the above implies that every _user_ of OpenSSL who includes x509.h has to either use -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN as well or that he is going to

Re: valgrind and openssl

Hi, If feeding predictable data into a PRNG that was already well seeded with unpredictable data produced a weaker PRNG, then you have found a security bug in the PRNG and I suggest you publish. Yeah, I've heard that a few times. However, consider the pathological case, in

RE: valgrind and openssl

Hi, It certainly would, but Valgrind isn't the only analysis tool people might want to use. A runtime flag provides a means of obtaining accurate results with any tool. Unfortunately, for am attacker it also provides a means of (possibly) weakening your program's randomness behind

Re: Makefile for building openssl for windows using mingw32 on linux

Hi, There are a lot of issues with mingw32 out there... Examples: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1451 http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1511 http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1552 But none are added into the snapshot... Why not? Because

Re: Not able to find code MD5_Update() ,SHA1_Update() and more digest function

Hi, If I call MD5_Update / Final / SHA_Update/ final ... all these functions are replaced by macros or ... ? No. The functions are there just fine. _Implementing_ them uses the macros. #define HASH_UPDATE SHA1_Update HASH_UPDATE will be replaced by the SHA1_Update .. is it

Re: [openssl.org #1520] request for checking if -in and -out files are same

Hi, I don't see why these assumptions cannot be done at compile time. There exists few different filesystem semanctics: Unix one, DOS/Windows one, VMS (versioned) one. How do you know which one to use? In our networked world it's difficult to know what kind of filesystems you're

Re: [openssl.org #1504] Padding bug in 0.9.8d (Solaris 9, Sparc)

Nils Larsch via RT schrieb: openssl doesn't support the type of padding (0x80, 0x00, 0x00, ...) you are using (openssl only supports the padding described in pkcs7). In that case, any idea why it does happen to work with version 0.9.8? Assuming that wasn't intended, it sure seems like

Re: [openssl.org #1504] Padding bug in 0.9.8d (Solaris 9, Sparc)

Hi, Any feedback about my problem? Can anybody confirm the padding bug shown by my sample code (see RT) or can nobody reproduce it (e.g. because I forgot to mention that I'm using a static build...)? Best, Stefan

[openssl.org #1504] Padding bug in 0.9.8d (Solaris 9, Sparc)

for that padding scheme been discontinued in the middle of the 0.9.8 series? Am I missing something that should be obvious? Thanks for any insight... Stefan Neis __ OpenSSL Project http

Re: [openssl.org #1504] Padding bug in 0.9.8d (Solaris 9, Sparc)

Hi, An additional bit of information: The behaviour doesn't seem to be platform specific, I can reproduce it on Intel(or rather AMD) under Linux as well (same gcc version (3.4.4) though). Regards, Stefan

Re: [openssl.org #1504] Padding bug in 0.9.8d (Solaris 9, Sparc)

Stephen Henson via RT: (snipp) I'm totally confused by a difference I'm observing between openssl-0.9.8 and openssl-0.9.8d, both compiled on the same solaris box with the same compiler installation (gcc-3.4.4), both passing make test. (snipp) Can you include a complete program that

Re: [openssl.org #1493] -march=ultrasparc doesn't work on Solaris 9

Hi, -mcpu wasn't deprecated on SPARC. I think it was only deprecated on i386. Seems that some platforms support -mcpu and others -march, ugh. I've reverted the sparc changes to the Configure script. BTW, you might want to double check (in general), whether you want to use

Re: Cross compile OpenSSL in Linux using MinGW32

Hi, I tried to compile OpenSSL using MinGW on Linux, but I could not do this. I've tried to modify configurations, converting ms/mingw.bat to ms/mingw.sh, removing the translation of / into \, and more... Before I making too much modifications, Have anyone succeeded in doing so?

RE: OPENSSL_gmtime on platforms that don't have a safe gmtime function

Hi, why not use mutexes to wrap the gmtime and memcpy, like other places in the library? Because it is either needless or insufficient. (snipp) On platforms where thread-specific data is not used, the mutexes would not prevent other code (not part of OpenSSL) from calling

Re: Implmentation for VC++6.0

Hi, I´m developing an application that uses OpenSSL. It´s working great, but it's an activeX componet so it has 3 dependencies, I really need a Visual Studio Project with the OpenSSL to compile them with my current proyect. I don´t want a DLL with 3 dependencies, I just want an

Re: [patch] make AES-cfb128-encrypt faster by uglifying it

Hi, 3. From my experience with gcc on powerpc, gcc handles large unaligned load/stores correctly by splitting them (sometimes unnecessary), but the code remains correct and in working order. Just as a counter example, on SUN, unaligned load stores just crash. Reliably and every time,

Re: HP-UX Poblem

Hi, I've just tried compiling OpenSSL-0.9.8a for HPPA64 architecture (using gcc-4.1) and 'make test' ends with ... ecb idea ok cbc idea ok cfb64 idea ok ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./shatest *** Termination signal 139 Stop. *** Error exit code 1 Stop. Any

Re: HP-UX Poblem

Hi, so I didn't really think of using HP's compiler. Well, using HP's compiler, I get an OpenSSL version which does successfully pass the make test command... Looks more and more like a bug in gcc-4.1 Portable code is a chore ain't it :) It could be worse, you could be trying to

Re: [PATCH] printf size_t support.

Hi, Is the patch tested on windows ? z modifier - I'm not sure that this is portable. if I remember correctly windows doesn't support this modifier (at least I was told this as we discussed this for another project) I'm not exactly sure, but I believe it's an extension of glibc

Re: Shared library version numbers [Was: LSB inclusion of OpenSSL]

Hi, If you simply use the -Bsymbolic flag when building libA, doesn't that solve the problem as well? And in a more portable way, since vrsioned symbols don't exist on many platforms? AFAIK, the idea of the flag is that the library doesn't automatically doesn't resolve its

Re: Shared library version numbers [Was: LSB inclusion of OpenSSL]

Hi, Then when the dynamic linker looks for a symbol, it looks at it by name. It will go over all objects to see if it exists in it. It will use the symbol from the first library it finds it in. This means, that a symbol that libA requires, and _should_ get from libssl.so.0.9.7, can

Re: [openssl.org #1230] static(no-shared) build for VC-32 have wrong codegeneration option

** Reply to note from Konstantin Sharenkov via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 26 Oct 2005 11:36:41 +0200 (METDST) Hi, but nt.mak contins line CFLAG= /MD /Ox /O2 /Ob2 /W3 /WX /Gs0 /GF /Gy /nologo -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN32 -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -DL_ENDIAN -DDSO_WIN32

Re: AIX 64 Bit gcc

Hi again, Is there a reason why openssl-0.9.8 doesn't support building a 64-bit version with gcc on AIX machines (nor does openssl-0.9.8a, AFAICS)? You have to keep in mind that some targets are community supported, that includes config lines, testing and eventual adaptations. None

AIX 64 Bit gcc

Hi, [ Sorry this is slightly outdated (I'm just back from three weeks of holiday and really wanted to send it before leaving ...) ] Is there a reason why openssl-0.9.8 doesn't support building a 64-bit version with gcc on AIX machines (nor does openssl-0.9.8a, AFAICS)? The following

OpenSSL-0.9.8(a) on OS/2

Hi, OpenSSL-0.9.8a fails to link for me on OS/2, a simple patch ensuring the correct compilation options (patch) diff -r -u openssl-0.9.8/util/pl/OS2-EMX.pl openssl-0.9.8.patched/util/pl/OS2-EMX.pl --- openssl-0.9.8/util/pl/OS2-EMX.pl2003-11-28