: Friday, July 04, 2003 1:52 PM
rt Subject: Re: [openssl.org #629] Custom error handling
rt
rt
rt In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 4 Jul
2003
rt 00:12:24 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt groups The problem is the following, yes your code
rt (ERR_pop_to_mark
: Friday, July 04, 2003 1:52 PM
rt Subject: Re: [openssl.org #629] Custom error handling
rt
rt
rt In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 4 Jul
2003
rt 00:12:24 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt groups The problem is the following, yes your code
rt (ERR_pop_to_mark
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 5 Jul 2003 08:24:45 +0200 (CEST), Frédéric
Giudicelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups That's pretty much what I asked from the beginning, the
groups possibility to use ERR_set_implementation and to have ERR_FNS
groups public. But because of (if (!err_fns)) on
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 5 Jul 2003 08:24:45 +0200 (CEST), Frédéric
Giudicelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups That's pretty much what I asked from the beginning, the
groups possibility to use ERR_set_implementation and to have ERR_FNS
groups public. But because of (if (!err_fns)) on
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 4 Jul 2003 00:12:24 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups The problem is the following, yes your code (ERR_pop_to_mark/ERR_set_mark)
groups is fine when a child function is adding a new error, however, what happends
groups when it calls
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #629] Custom error handling
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 4 Jul 2003
00:12:24 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups The problem is the following, yes your
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #629] Custom error handling
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 4 Jul 2003
00:12:24 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups The problem is the following, yes your
Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rt Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rt Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 1:52 PM
rt Subject: Re: [openssl.org #629] Custom error handling
rt
rt
rt In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 4 Jul 2003
rt 00:12:24 +0200, Frédéric
Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rt Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rt Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 1:52 PM
rt Subject: Re: [openssl.org #629] Custom error handling
rt
rt
rt In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 4 Jul 2003
rt 00:12:24 +0200, Frédéric
I just made up my mind on this issue. I will not implement
ERR_disable() or ERR_enable() for the reasons stated below. And that
resolves this ticket.
[levitte - Fri Jun 20 00:20:52 2003]:
Just for the sake of keeping history with this ticket: I've concerns
with ERR_disable() in relation to
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 11:01 PM
Subject: [openssl.org #629] Custom error handling
I just made up my mind on this issue. I will not implement
ERR_disable() or ERR_enable() for the reasons stated below. And that
resolves this ticket
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 11:01 PM
Subject: [openssl.org #629] Custom error handling
I just made up my mind on this issue. I will not implement
ERR_disable() or ERR_enable() for the reasons stated below. And that
resolves this ticket
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 3 Jul 2003 23:09:05 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups As I said earlier, you don't have to implement it, however
groups that would be nice if you could make the cutsom error handling
groups code work, which would allow me to implement
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 3 Jul 2003 23:09:05 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups As I said earlier, you don't have to implement it, however
groups that would be nice if you could make the cutsom error handling
groups code work, which would allow me to implement
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #629] Custom error handling
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 3 Jul 2003
23:09:05 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups As I said earlier, you don't have to implement it, however
groups that would
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:20 AM
Subject: [openssl.org #629] Custom error handling
Just for the sake of keeping history with this ticket: I've concerns
with ERR_disable() in relation to the OpenSSL code checking for certain
errors in some places. If error setting is disabled, we
Just for the sake of keeping history with this ticket: I've concerns
with ERR_disable() in relation to the OpenSSL code checking for certain
errors in some places. If error setting is disabled, we might very well
end up with unwanted problems. Sure, it can be fixed by temporarely
re-enabling
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 14 Jun 2003 05:08:50 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups Here are the patch (crypto/err), have been generated from
groups openssl-SNAP-20030612:
groups added: int disabled; to ERR_STATE and the following functions:
groups - ERR_disable
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 14 Jun 2003 05:08:50 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups Here are the patch (crypto/err), have been generated from
groups openssl-SNAP-20030612:
groups added: int disabled; to ERR_STATE and the following functions:
groups - ERR_disable
- Original Message -
From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 12:33 AM
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #629] Custom error handling
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 12 Jun 2003
00:22:28 +0200, Frédéric
I've implemented ERR_set_mark() and ERR_pop_to_mark(), which can be used
for similar functionality. I'll look into ERR_disable() and
ERR_enable() as well, but that requires quite a lot more work.
If the implemented functions are enough for you for now, I'll resolve
this ticket.
[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:55 PM
Subject: [openssl.org #629] Custom error handling
I've implemented ERR_set_mark() and ERR_pop_to_mark(), which can be used
for similar functionality. I'll look into ERR_disable() and
ERR_enable() as well
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11 Jun 2003 23:52:17 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups Ok.
groups Is there a new release soon? I would like to have it implemented
groups (ERR_disable/ERR_enable) by next release, I have no problem doing it, just
groups want to know if
, June 12, 2003 12:22 AM
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #629] Custom error handling
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11 Jun 2003
23:52:17 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups Ok.
groups Is there a new release soon? I would like to have it implemented
groups (ERR_disable
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:22:28 +0200, Frédéric Giudicelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
groups Ok, I'll wait for you to tell me when the update on the error
groups handling will be done, I'll take it from there.
If you mean to ask for when the new functions ERR_set_mark()
25 matches
Mail list logo
