-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cottbus.de] On Behalf Of OpenSSL-Bugs
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 1:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [openssl.org #709] AutoReply: OpenSSL-0.9.7c on Solaris
Greetings,
This message has
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 1 Oct 2003 16:36:20 +0200 (METDST), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Also, line 8 of ui.pod needs a comma on the end, I keep finding them.
rt Also, this is kind of cosmetic and makes it easier, but in des_modes.pod
rt could you change the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 1 Oct 2003 16:36:20 +0200 (METDST), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt Also, line 8 of ui.pod needs a comma on the end, I keep finding them.
rt Also, this is kind of cosmetic and makes it easier, but in des_modes.pod
rt could you change the
, 2003 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #709] AutoReply: OpenSSL-0.9.7c on Solaris
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 1 Oct
2003
16:36:20 +0200 (METDST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
rt Also, line 8 of ui.pod needs a comma
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 1 Oct 2003 17:01:19 +0200 (METDST), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt That's an OK solution, but what are the feelings towards those
rt commas? Are those left out on purpose or were they typos?
They were typos, and have already been
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 1 Oct 2003 17:01:19 +0200 (METDST), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt That's an OK solution, but what are the feelings towards those
rt commas? Are those left out on purpose or were they typos?
They were typos, and have already been
