Corinne Dive-Reclus wrote:
So far, the current ENGINE seems good to me. Your choice to hook
only asymmetric operations seems reasonnable for a SSL implementation.
OpenSSL is not an SSL implementation. That's one of the many things it
does. If your hardware does other stuff, then
February 2001 00:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ENGINE_load_key
[snip]
Corinne Dive-Reclus, Principal Software Engineer
Baltimore Technologies, Focus 31, West Wing,Cleveland Road, Hemel
Hempstead,
Hertfordshire, HP2 7BW, England
Tel: +44 (0) 1442 342600 Fax: +44 (0) 1442 347399
From: Corinne Dive-Reclus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CDive If I need to follow some specific procedure to add a new type
CDive of ENGINE hook to OpenSSL, let me know I will do it with
CDive pleasure.
Procedure to follow is:
- if you'd like to see support for your hardware in OpenSSL, please
-Original Message-
From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 February 2001 10:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ENGINE_load_key
From: Corinne Dive-Reclus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CDive If I need to follow
Corinne Dive-Reclus wrote:
CDive Anyway, any help about key generation (no ENGINE hook
CDive available? cannot dynamically create a key into an ENGINE ?)
CDive and key management will be greatly appreciated.
So far, we've extended the collection of engine hooks when there's
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
CDive Even if the hardware is capable of symmetric operations, it is
CDive probably to slow to go down to it to perform the operation.
Depends. If it takes load away from the central CPU, it might be a
good thing from that point of view, by increasing
of
this message by a third party or as a result of any virus being passed on.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 February 2001 13:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ENGINE_load_key
From: Dr S N Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
drh Then PEM_*_PrivateKey() should be able to handle it largely
drh transparently and applications should be able to use the keys
drh even if they aren't ENGINE aware.
Uhmmm, applications that use ENGINE will have to be ENGINE aware
enough to "load" the
Hi there,
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Michael [iso-8859-1] Ströder wrote:
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
CDive Even if the hardware is capable of symmetric operations, it is
CDive probably to slow to go down to it to perform the operation.
Depends. If it takes load away from the
Hi there,
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Dr S N Henson wrote:
Personally I'd like to see symmetric support at some point. I like the
idea of being able to increase security by not keeping secret keys in
memory but only references to them. Unfortunately that's a bit tricky
with OpenSSLs current EVP
Geoff Thorpe wrote:
Hi there,
On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Dr S N Henson wrote:
Personally I'd like to see symmetric support at some point. I like the
idea of being able to increase security by not keeping secret keys in
memory but only references to them. Unfortunately that's a bit tricky
Hello,
I am not sure to understand how this function works:
- Do we load a key from a file into a hardware engine and
what is the file format ?
or
- Do we load a key from a hardware engine into a file ?
How has this file been
[snip]
Corinne Dive-Reclus, Principal Software Engineer
Baltimore Technologies, Focus 31, West Wing,Cleveland Road, Hemel
Hempstead,
Hertfordshire, HP2 7BW, England
Tel: +44 (0) 1442 342600 Fax: +44 (0) 1442 347399
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website http://www.baltimore.com/
Just out of
13 matches
Mail list logo
