Re: Memory Leaks Detecting on WIN32

2001-01-10 Thread Oscar Jacobsson
Dror wrote: The disadvantages (in VC environment) are: 1.) that the memory leaks report appears in two places: the leaks occurred in the application (with the file name and line number) together with those occurred in OpenSSL (without the file name and line number ) on the debug output

Re: Memory Leaks Detecting on WIN32

2001-01-10 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
From: "Dror" [EMAIL PROTECTED] drorotmi The functions interface (defined in crtdbg.h) is as follow: drorotmi void *_malloc_dbg( size_t size, int blockType, const char *filename, drorotmi int linenumber ); drorotmi void *_realloc_dbg( void *userData, size_t newSize, int blockType, drorotmi const

Re: Memory Leaks Detecting on WIN32

2001-01-10 Thread Dror
Oh, I see what you mean, those are so to say replacements for malloc() and friends... Hmm... Actually, this is doable through yet another call level, but it also adds another level of complication. Precisely.

Re: Memory Leaks Detecting on WIN32

2001-01-10 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Dror, I've made a change that allows for the kind of functionality you requested. It will be available in tonights snapshot, or if you want to rsync it immediately... The requirements for you will be to add the following code to your application (and remove the CRYPTO_set_mem_debug_functions()

Re: Memory Leaks Detecting on WIN32

2001-01-10 Thread Dror
And do what with it? It would become some kind of OpenSSLish value You're right, I misinterpreted your previous answer. I'll check it as soon as I can fetch it and will inform you. TAL Dror __ OpenSSL Project