On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 09:02:45PM +0100, Ulf Moeller wrote:
Obtain lock CRYPTO_LOCK_RSA before creating BN_MONT_CTX
structures and setting rsa-_method_mod_{n,p,q}.
Is it really a good idea to put this into the stable branch?
In the later version (where locks are only held during the
From: Bodo Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
moeller On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 09:02:45PM +0100, Ulf Moeller wrote:
moeller
moellerObtain lock CRYPTO_LOCK_RSA before creating BN_MONT_CTX
moellerstructures and setting rsa-_method_mod_{n,p,q}.
moeller
moeller Is it really a good idea to put this
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 12:01:13PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
Obtain lock CRYPTO_LOCK_RSA before creating BN_MONT_CTX
structures and setting rsa-_method_mod_{n,p,q}.
Is it really a good idea to put this into the stable branch?
In the later version (where locks are only
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
From: Bodo Moeller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
moeller On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 09:02:45PM +0100, Ulf Moeller wrote:
moeller
moeller Is it really a good idea to put this into the stable branch?
moeller
moeller In the later version
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 12:56:21PM -0800, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
[...]
What if the code was structured as follows;
if((rsa-_method_mod_n == NULL) [etc])
{
BN_MONT_CTX *bn_mont_ctx;
int bailout;
if((bn_mont_ctx=BN_MONT_CTX_new()) == NULL)
[do
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bodo18-Dec-2000 17:36:11
Modified:.Tag: OpenSSL_0_9_6-stable CHANGES
crypto/rsa Tag: OpenSSL_0_9_6-stable rsa_eay.c
Log:
Obtain lock CRYPTO_LOCK_RSA before creating BN_MONT_CTX
structures and
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/rsa rsa_eay.c
Hi Bodo (and anyone else interested),
Just a thought I was having about locking and things. Rather than us
worrying so much about how to do per-object locking (as opposed to our
current per-class locking
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Reddie, Steven wrote:
The problem with only locking during the assignment is that potentially
mutliple threads will be doing [extensive] work that will be thrown away
when they discover that another thread beat them to it. The result could be
that the lock is held
Geoff touches on (actually, implies :) some good points.
Again, I want to point interested folks to the following:
http://gatekeeper.dec.com/pub/DEC/SRC/research-reports/abstracts/src-rr-035.html
Written by Andrew Birrell in 1989, 35 highly readable pages. The abstract:
This paper provides
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 7:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: cvs commit: openssl/crypto/rsa rsa_eay.c
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000, Reddie, Steven wrote:
The problem with only locking during the assignment is that potentially
mutliple threads will be doing
Hi Bodo (and anyone else interested),
Just a thought I was having about locking and things. Rather than us
worrying so much about how to do per-object locking (as opposed to our
current per-class locking), I wonder if it's worth considering how to
minimize the number and complexity of operations
11 matches
Mail list logo
