Andy Polyakov wrote:
There are trivial differences between Solaris 2.5.1 and the later
Solaris versions. Not enough to cause a build problem. So if
it's busted on 2.5.1 it will be busted on 2.6, 2.7 etc.
Newer Solaris version *are* equipped with newer assembler, which *does*
support more x86
Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 09:40:36PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
This is from /openssl-SNAP-20090405 on Solaris x86 ver 2.5.1 using
gcc 2.95.3:
Ow! Solaris 2.5.1, and gcc2?
Didn't Sun even finally end all support for Solaris 2.5?
There are trivial differences
There are trivial differences between Solaris 2.5.1 and the later
Solaris versions. Not enough to cause a build problem. So if
it's busted on 2.5.1 it will be busted on 2.6, 2.7 etc.
Newer Solaris version *are* equipped with newer assembler, which *does*
support more x86 instructions, such
Andy Polyakov wrote:
There are trivial differences between Solaris 2.5.1 and the later
Solaris versions. Not enough to cause a build problem. So if
it's busted on 2.5.1 it will be busted on 2.6, 2.7 etc.
Newer Solaris version *are* equipped with newer assembler, which *does*
support
This is from /openssl-SNAP-20090405 on Solaris x86 ver 2.5.1 using
gcc 2.95.3:
gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../asn1 -I../evp -I../../include -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC
-DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -march=pentium -Wall -DL_ENDIAN
-DOPENSSL_NO_INLINE_ASM
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 09:40:36PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
This is from /openssl-SNAP-20090405 on Solaris x86 ver 2.5.1 using
gcc 2.95.3:
Ow! Solaris 2.5.1, and gcc2?
Didn't Sun even finally end all support for Solaris 2.5?
Thor
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009, Eric Norman wrote:
On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
I'd prefer that IBM release whatever library they're using to identify
and handle Julian days. ;)
In case y'all didn't know, converting to/from Julian days is simple. See
Hi Steve,
Robin will port all the patches from
http://sctp.fh-muenster.de/dtls-patches.html
to the beta version when he is back from vacation
early next week.
Regarding gettimeofday(): It is pretty common on Unix
systems, not sure about Windows. But we can use any
other function which allows us
I'd prefer that IBM release whatever library they're using to identify
and handle Julian days. ;)
-Kyle H
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Michael Tüxen
michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de wrote:
Hi Steve,
Robin will port all the patches from
http://sctp.fh-muenster.de/dtls-patches.html
to the
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009, Michael Txen wrote:
Regarding gettimeofday(): It is pretty common on Unix
systems, not sure about Windows. But we can use any
other function which allows us to get the current time.
Any preferences?
Well basically anything that works on all the plethora of platforms
Hi Steve,
thanks for the pointer.
Best regards
Michael
On Apr 2, 2009, at 9:34 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009, Michael Txen wrote:
Regarding gettimeofday(): It is pretty common on Unix
systems, not sure about Windows. But we can use any
other function which allows us
On Apr 2, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
I'd prefer that IBM release whatever library they're using to identify
and handle Julian days. ;)
In case y'all didn't know, converting to/from Julian days is simple.
See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_day
or
Dear OpenSSL Project Team,
are the DTLS related patches sent by Robin incorporated?
The patches have been reviewed by the original author of
the DTLS implementation and his comments have been incorporated.
We also have successfully done an intop test with Certicom.
Best regards
Michael
On Apr
OpenSSL wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OpenSSL version 1.0.0 Beta 1
Please download and test them as soon as possible. This new OpenSSL
version incorporates 107 documented changes and bugfixes to the
toolkit (for a complete list
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009, Michael Txen wrote:
Dear OpenSSL Project Team,
are the DTLS related patches sent by Robin incorporated?
The patches have been reviewed by the original author of
the DTLS implementation and his comments have been incorporated.
We also have successfully done an intop
15 matches
Mail list logo
