On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01:52:12PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two patches for hpux64-parisc-gcc support in Configure and one
to correct an error in evp_test.c, which calls strsep instead of sstrsep
(09.7-beta1 only).
Thanks. The strsep issue is already fixed in the current tree.
:
|
| Subject: Re: Various patches for 0.9.6d and 0.9.7-beta1
|
-|
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 03:06:22PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the problem is because 32bit HP uses the SOM object format
and 64bit HP uses ELF. These are quite different and hence gcc
cannot be configured for both targets. So when you build gcc it is
a different target
]
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: Various patches for 0.9.6d and 0.9.7-beta1
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 03:44:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the entries you supplied are for gcc (hppa64-hp-hpux11.00)?
Is there a way for config to find out itself? Please have a look
into config and search for GCC_ARCH to see what I mean.
Sure. It will take me a couple of
PROTECTED]
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: Various patches for 0.9.6d and 0.9.7-beta1
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 04:53:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've picked up the snapshot. There is a problem with the new code.
GCCVER=`(gcc --version) 2/dev/null | head -1`
if [ $GCCVER != ]; then
CC=gcc
# then strip off whatever prefix Cygnus as well as GCC 3.1 prepends
#
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 10 Jun 2002
18:03:43 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Lutz.Jaenicke On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 04:53:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Lutz.Jaenicke I've picked up the snapshot. There is a problem with the new code.
Lutz.Jaenicke
