Re: select patches for DOS

2003-08-18 Thread Gisle Vanem
Here is a revised patch using isatty() to check if stdin/stdin is redirected. If they are allow setting binary mode. Otherwise skip it as doing so prevents terminating a stuck app with ^C/^Break. I can't see any use for making stdin binary while in "interactive" mode except maybe in a password pro

Re: select patches for DOS

2003-08-17 Thread Gisle Vanem
"Doug Kaufman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > In crypto/bio/bss_file.c, you change the way that binary or text is > chosen, and allow binary only if not going to stdout or or from stdin. I > think that the usual way to handle this (at least under DJGPP) is to use > "isatty", and not allow binary if i

Re: select patches for DOS

2003-08-16 Thread Doug Kaufman
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Gisle Vanem wrote: > I didn't get any reaction on this patch. Isn't 32-bit MSDOS targets considered > good enough any longer? > > The original message and patch is here: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-dev&m=105943488203763&w=2 I haven't built a DOS version of ope

Re: select patches for DOS

2003-08-15 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 15 Aug 2003 15:31:20 +0200, "Gisle Vanem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: giva> I didn't get any reaction on this patch. Isn't 32-bit MSDOS giva> targets considered good enough any longer? Nope, I think it's just summer, and people don't work quite as much then.

Re: select patches for DOS

2003-08-15 Thread Gisle Vanem
I didn't get any reaction on this patch. Isn't 32-bit MSDOS targets considered good enough any longer? The original message and patch is here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-dev&m=105943488203763&w=2 --gv __ OpenSSL Pro