On 06/01/2014 09:28 AM, Janpopan wrote:
is there a list of currently supported platforms?
Which platforms are deprecaded an could/should be removed in the
sourcecode?
MS-DOS?
Windows 16 Bit?
OS/2?
Windows 95/98/ME?
Windows NT/2000/XP?
I think there is plenty of code which assumes size_t (and
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:14:18AM +1000, Peter Waltenberg wrote:
>
> This is NOT the Linux kernel, the Linux kernel is directly funded by
> several of the larger companies, they have employees contributing directly
> on the kernel, with access to internal hardware resources.
Yes, and I'm saying
shhooks than the obvious, export
compliance is the obvious problem, but there are other issues, trust for
example.
Peter
From: "Theodore Ts'o"
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Date: 04/06/2014 12:18 AM
Subject: Re: AW: Which platforms will be supported in t
I don't disagree (or I certainly don't disagree completely) with anything
that has been said so far. But I think it's easy to assign disproportionate
angst to this or that problem.
For example, and that's all this is, but one of the most serious issues I
think we have in the openssl code is that m
> especially Stephen Henson, who has kept it together in much the same way as
> Keith Richards did the Stones.
With no disrespect intended to either man, I have to say that this is an
analogy that never would have occurred to me in a million years.
/r$
--
Principal Security Engineer
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> There's a very simple solution to that problem, especially since we
> now have the support and attention of many hardware companies. The
> rule should be very simple. If a company doesn't contribute either
> (a) exclusive, dedicated hardwar
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 02:22:07PM +1000, Peter Waltenberg wrote:
>
> One of the uglier problems is that unless you can build/test on all the
> platforms on each change you'll almost certainly break platforms
> unexpectedly - that lack of hardware has been one of the long term problems
> and it's
Ts'o"
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Date: 03/06/2014 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: AW: Which platforms will be supported in the future on
which platforms will be removed?
Sent by:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:20:17PM +1000, Peter Walte
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:20:17PM +1000, Peter Waltenberg wrote:
> (c) EBCDIC.
>
> z/OS is still alive. I'll concede that one is weird and hard to get hold
> of, but it has a lot of users still.
z/OS supports ASCII, and UTF-8, and has its own conversion routines
built into the system. So it's
7;live' platform.
Peter
From: "Theodore Ts'o"
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Date: 03/06/2014 12:01 PM
Subject:Re: AW: Which platforms will be supported in the future on
which platforms will be removed?
Sent by:owner-openssl-...@openssl.o
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 11:22:58AM +1000, Peter Waltenberg wrote:
>
> I won't argue that sometimes legacy support makes the code hard to read,
> but in itself I don't think it's causing bugs.
The OpenBSD people are right here. If it's hard to read, then we
don't have many eyeballs on the code.
eodore Ts'o"
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Date: 03/06/2014 02:30 AM
Subject: Re: AW: Which platforms will be supported in the future on
which platforms will be removed?
Sent by:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 03:38:22PM +0200, stefan.
Am 02.06.2014 17:42, schrieb Theodore Ts'o:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 03:38:22PM +0200, stefan.n...@t-online.de wrote:
>> * How much do you gain by removing support for the platform?
>>
>> Is there any relevant amount of code, that is really NT/2000/XP specific
>> and unneeded for newer Windows rel
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 03:38:22PM +0200, stefan.n...@t-online.de wrote:
> * How much do you gain by removing support for the platform?
>
> Is there any relevant amount of code, that is really NT/2000/XP specific
> and unneeded for newer Windows releases? Breaking the support for
> the ancient pla
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:38 AM, stefan.n...@t-online.de <
> stefan.n...@t-online.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > > Which platforms are deprecaded an could/should be removed in the
>> > > sourcecode?
>> > > MS-DOS?
>> > > Windows 16 Bi
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:38 AM, stefan.n...@t-online.de <
stefan.n...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Which platforms are deprecaded an could/should be removed in the
> > > sourcecode?
> > > MS-DOS?
> > > Windows 16 Bit?
> > > OS/2?
> > > Windows 95/98/ME?
> > > Windows NT/2000/XP?
Hi,
> > Which platforms are deprecaded an could/should be removed in the
> > sourcecode?
> > MS-DOS?
> > Windows 16 Bit?
> > OS/2?
> > Windows 95/98/ME?
> > Windows NT/2000/XP?
>
> Necessary criteria for a platform to be included in the first list would be:
> * Currency, i.e. a platfo
Please Ravi,
stop jumping on any post I make on various thread to get us back to
your WCE concern.
I am working on it...don't worry, but it will not get faster, and you
will find no help from others,
by polluting other threads with that particular subject which is of
interest for some of us.
Hello,Pierre Delaage
Have you seen My Attached images .Screenshot Of Emulator.
i dont Know Which is Problem?
how casn i Solve this?Is There any problem in .LIb and in .DLL?
How Can i Test This Two Libs and Dll?
Hi All,
I would like to add 3 points
1/ please add to the list Windows CE >= 5.0 / Windows Mobile >= 6
2/ MAY add a compatibility statement as this, for ANY platform :
- compile with THOSE "development environmentS",
- run on THOSE "runtime platforms" (hardware/ Os / emulators)
- run on some
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 10:55:09PM +0200, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> Well that's one of the issues we need to resolve. Apache now compiles with
> OPENSSL_NO_SSL_INTERN but it needed some additional accessor functions before
> it could.
FWIW, Postfix TLS support predates OpenSSL 0.9.7, but the on
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014, Richard Moore wrote:
> On 1 June 2014 19:38, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
>
> > > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 01:39:54PM -0400, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > > > Make structures opaque when possible and provide accessor functions.
> > Within openssl itself use macros if you want.
> > >
>
On 1 June 2014 19:38, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 01:39:54PM -0400, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > > Make structures opaque when possible and provide accessor functions.
> Within openssl itself use macros if you want.
> >
> > This has been on my list of things I want to see happe
On 01/06/14 19:38, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2014, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 01:39:54PM -0400, Salz, Rich wrote:
>>> Make structures opaque when possible and provide accessor functions. Within
>>> openssl itself use macros if you want.
>>
>> This has been
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 01:39:54PM -0400, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > Make structures opaque when possible and provide accessor functions. Within
> > openssl itself use macros if you want.
>
> This has been on my list of things I want to see happen for a long
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 01:39:54PM -0400, Salz, Rich wrote:
> Make structures opaque when possible and provide accessor functions. Within
> openssl itself use macros if you want.
This has been on my list of things I want to see happen for a long time
too. Together we removing some APIs. I also
The core team should come up with a list and announce the decision. SOON. Be
firm. Say something like "in xxx months, support for these platforms will be
dropped and we will start to remove that code." Encourage folks interested in
supporting those platforms to maintain a fork. I don't care wh
On 01/06/14 08:28, Janpopan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is there a list of currently supported platforms?
>
> Which platforms are deprecaded an could/should be removed in the
> sourcecode?
> MS-DOS?
> Windows 16 Bit?
> OS/2?
> Windows 95/98/ME?
> Windows NT/2000/XP?
Hi Jan
You raise an interesting an
Hi all,
is there a list of currently supported platforms?
Which platforms are deprecaded an could/should be removed in the
sourcecode?
MS-DOS?
Windows 16 Bit?
OS/2?
Windows 95/98/ME?
Windows NT/2000/XP?
Cheers
Jan
__
OpenSSL Pr
29 matches
Mail list logo
