In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 28 Sep 2003 04:44:29 +0200 (METDST), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
rt
rt I applied your changes to 0.9.8-dev and 0.9.7-stable. Thank you.
rt
rt Ticket resolved.
rt
rt [EMAIL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 28 Sep 2003 04:44:29 +0200 (METDST), [EMAIL
PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt
rt On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
rt
rt I applied your changes to 0.9.8-dev and 0.9.7-stable. Thank you.
rt
rt Ticket resolved.
rt
rt
I applied your changes to 0.9.8-dev and 0.9.7-stable. Thank you.
Ticket resolved.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jul 29 09:10:37 2003]:
These are my patches to get openssl s_client working on
MSDOS / djgpp / Watt-32.
The assumtion that DOS in general can do select() on stdin/stdout
is wrong
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
I applied your changes to 0.9.8-dev and 0.9.7-stable. Thank you.
Ticket resolved.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jul 29 09:10:37 2003]:
These are my patches to get openssl s_client working on
MSDOS / djgpp / Watt-32.
The patch was
Here is a revised patch using isatty() to check if stdin/stdin
is redirected. If they are allow setting binary mode. Otherwise
skip it as doing so prevents terminating a stuck app with ^C/^Break.
I can't see any use for making stdin binary while in interactive
mode except maybe in a password
Doug Kaufman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In crypto/bio/bss_file.c, you change the way that binary or text is
chosen, and allow binary only if not going to stdout or or from stdin. I
think that the usual way to handle this (at least under DJGPP) is to use
isatty, and not allow binary if isatty
On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Gisle Vanem wrote:
I didn't get any reaction on this patch. Isn't 32-bit MSDOS targets considered
good enough any longer?
The original message and patch is here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-devm=105943488203763w=2
I haven't built a DOS version of openssl
I didn't get any reaction on this patch. Isn't 32-bit MSDOS targets considered
good enough any longer?
The original message and patch is here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-devm=105943488203763w=2
--gv
__
OpenSSL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Aug 2003 15:31:20 +0200, Gisle Vanem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
giva I didn't get any reaction on this patch. Isn't 32-bit MSDOS
giva targets considered good enough any longer?
Nope, I think it's just summer, and people don't work quite as much
then. I've
These are my patches to get openssl s_client working on
MSDOS / djgpp / Watt-32.
The assumtion that DOS in general can do select() on stdin/stdout
is wrong (allthough djgpp has some support for it, it's slow and clunky).
My patch uses kbhit() as Win32/WinCE does.
One other patch: I had to
These are my patches to get openssl s_client working on
MSDOS / djgpp / Watt-32.
The assumtion that DOS in general can do select() on stdin/stdout
is wrong (allthough djgpp has some support for it, it's slow and clunky).
My patch uses kbhit() as Win32/WinCE does.
One other patch: I had to
11 matches
Mail list logo