Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 11:26, Gisle Vanem wrote:
Some of the new ts/ files are too long for a 8+3 filesystem.
a ton of files are too long for 8+3 filesystem in the openssl tarball
None of the *.[ch] files. They are all 8+3 unique AFAICS (and
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 06:04, Gisle Vanem wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 11:26, Gisle Vanem wrote:
Some of the new ts/ files are too long for a 8+3 filesystem.
a ton of files are too long for 8+3 filesystem in the openssl tarball
None
Gisle Vanem wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 11:26, Gisle Vanem wrote:
Some of the new ts/ files are too long for a 8+3 filesystem.
a ton of files are too long for 8+3 filesystem in the openssl tarball
None of the *.[ch] files. They are all 8+3
Some of the new ts/ files are too long for a 8+3 filesystem.
ts_req_print.c
ts_req_utils.c
ts_resp_print.c
ts_resp_sign.c
ts_resp_utils.c
ts_resp_verify.c
ts_verify_ctx.c
I only ask if the ts_resp_*.c files could be renamed to
ts_rsp_*.c.
--gv
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 11:26, Gisle Vanem wrote:
Some of the new ts/ files are too long for a 8+3 filesystem.
a ton of files are too long for 8+3 filesystem in the openssl tarball
-mike
__
OpenSSL Project