Re: Win 64a dynamic link library build was unsuccessful using beta6

bss_file.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol OPENSSL_UplinkTable b_dump.obj : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol OPENSSL_UplinkTable So as you adviced I tried the following: perl ms/uplink.pl win64a uplink.asm ml64 -c uplink.asm add it to APP_EX_OBJ in ntdll.mak file.

Re: Error in July releases of Openssl 0.9.7

The previews versions have an error. They do not recognize Certs in Apache-SSL. The problems turns up in 20050701 . Are you sure that not earlier? The closest change that might affect certificate look-ups is dated 23rd, to be specific http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=14114. The new

Re: Win 64a dynamic link library build was unsuccessful using beta6

Hi! First of all I figured it out that i should use SHLIB_EX_OBJ not APP_EX_OBJ :)) Second if I add both uplink.obj and uptable.obj to SHLIB_EX_OBJ then I cannot link libeay32.dll: link /nologo /subsystem:console /opt:ref bufferoverflowU.lib /dll /out:o ut32dll\libeay32.dll

Re: Win 64a dynamic link library build was unsuccessful using beta6

First of all I figured it out that i should use SHLIB_EX_OBJ not APP_EX_OBJ :)) Keep in mind that the instructions were provided off the top of my head and not actually tested, which is why it's so bumpy. Bear with me:-) Second if I add both uplink.obj and uptable.obj to SHLIB_EX_OBJ then I

Re: Error in July releases of Openssl 0.9.7

The previews versions have an error. They do not recognize Certs in Apache-SSL. The problems turns up in 20050701 . Are you sure that not earlier? The closest change that might affect certificate look-ups is dated 23rd, to be specific http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=14114. The new code

Re: Error in July releases of Openssl 0.9.7

On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 03:34:09PM +0200, Andy Polyakov wrote: The previews versions have an error. They do not recognize Certs in Apache-SSL. The problems turns up in 20050701 . Are you sure that not earlier? The closest change that might affect certificate look-ups is dated 23rd, to

Re: Win 64a dynamic link library build was unsuccessful using beta6

Hi again! Well, no multiple $lazyN is improvement, isn't it? The above error message doesn't make sense though. uplink.obj complains about symbol being already defined in itself... H-m-m-m... I have to ponder over this... Thanks. But i have made some progress... see later in this mail.

Re: Error in July releases of Openssl 0.9.7

The previews versions have an error. They do not recognize Certs in Apache-SSL. The problems turns up in 20050701 . Are you sure that not earlier? The closest change that might affect certificate look-ups is dated 23rd, to be specific http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=14114. The new code

Re: Win 64a dynamic link library build was unsuccessful using beta6

Stop saying it works properly. It links, it passes the test, but it's missing the functionality. Well, functionality which I don't need. Sorry, bit for me it's either everything or nothing. In this particular context Applink is either there, ready to be used or not there [in which case I'd

Re: Error in July releases of Openssl 0.9.7

7On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Andy Polyakov wrote: Are you sure that not earlier? The closest change that might affect certificate look-ups is dated 23rd, to be specific http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=14114. The new code is buggy! As it is now dir variable can be used uninitialized and it

Re: linux+mingw - create openssl for windows [u]

lost. Regards, Andreas diff -udrNP openssl-0.9.8-stable-SNAP-20050703.orig/Configure openssl-0.9.8-stable-SNAP-20050703/Configure --- openssl-0.9.8-stable-SNAP-20050703.orig/Configure 2005-07-04 00:27:11.169168808 +0200 +++ openssl-0.9.8-stable-SNAP-20050703/Configure 2005-07-04 00:56:17.650663264