Re: MD5 conflicts?

1999-03-29 Thread Alex Zepeda
> md5 is needed directly for many purposes. I guess that is why FreeBSD > has its own implementation. Righto, but md5 (or anything for that matter) from a specific library/package should be in its own directory. > > Well, to do that, I'd have to put /usr/local/include before /usr/include > > on

Re: MD5 conflicts?

1999-03-29 Thread Ulf Möller
> Since it seems like md5.h and err.h aren't going to be included > directly... they could fit in say md5 is needed directly for many purposes. I guess that is why FreeBSD has its own implementation. > Well, to do that, I'd have to put /usr/local/include before /usr/include > on the include

Re: MD5 conflicts?

1999-03-29 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Ulf [iso-8859-1] Möller wrote: > If the BSD folks make incompatible changes to the definition, they > ought to change the name, too. > > Renaming the structure in OpenSSL is a bad idea. Otherwise, once > FreeBSD upgrades to the current version, we have to change it again, >

Re: Revokation Utility

1999-03-29 Thread madwolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > It should understand multiple CA's via the -name flag. Ok, noted. > It should take multiple "-in xxx" flags. use the -infiles flag. > It should take the "-inform" flag (multiply). > That is, the following should work: > ssleay revoke -inform DER -in cert.d

Re: Lack of TFM

1999-03-29 Thread CJ Holmes
> http://www.columbia.edu/~ariel/ssleay/cryptosupp_index.html You're right, that *should* be linked from the OpenSSL page. It is leaps and bounds beyond the docs folder. Can we go one better than that, though? I wonder if those pages shouldn't form the core of a new set of developer docu

Re: Lack of TFM

1999-03-29 Thread Ariel T. Glenn
>While the docs are incomplete and not up to date with the latest OpenSSL >releases, there is an excellent starting point at > http://www.columbia.edu/~ariel/ssleay/cryptosupp_index.html Now that there is a stable 0.9.2 release out I guess I had better convert them all to it. So much for catchi

Re: Configure linux-mips still broken

1999-03-29 Thread Niels Poppe
Niels Poppe wrote: > > There's a bug in Configure line 154: > the entry for "linux-mips" has an embedded linefeed > because of a line wrap, causing make to choke on it. > Well, there's another bug in there, BN_LLONG is not an object file :) New patch replaces previous posting -- Niels Poppe -

Re: MD5 conflicts?

1999-03-29 Thread Ulf Möller
> If the BSD folks make incompatible changes to the definition, they > ought to change the name, too. Oops. The MD5 code in FreeBSD is RSADSI's. The rest of my message is still true, though. And eay's implementation probably is faster anyway. :)

Re: Lack of TFM

1999-03-29 Thread Chris Jalbert
On 3/29/1999 8:02 AM, CJ Holmes enlightened me with the following: >Much of the code in OpenSSL is quite good but the lack of documentation >really limits its usefulness. So I'm offering to document one or two >modules of the library, if that would be a worthwhile task. (Pick a >module, any mod

Re: OpenSSL 0.9.2b Configure failure: sunos-gcc

1999-03-29 Thread Ulf Möller
> $ ./config > Configuring for sunos-gcc > syntax error in file ./Configure at line 9, next 2 tokens "use strict" Are you using Perl 5? Version 4 is no longer supported. __ OpenSSL Project http://

Re: OpenSSL 0.9.2b Configure failure: sunos-gcc

1999-03-29 Thread Jeffrey Altman
> $ ./config sorry, needed to specify the use of 'perl5' in 'config' instead of 'perl'. Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer * Kermit-95 for Win32 and OS/2 The Kermit Project * Columbia University 612 West 115th St #716 * New York, NY * 10025 http://www.kerm

OpenSSL 0.9.2b Configure failure: sunos-gcc

1999-03-29 Thread Jeffrey Altman
$ ./config Configuring for sunos-gcc syntax error in file ./Configure at line 9, next 2 tokens "use strict" Illegal modulus of constant zero in file ./Configure at line 76, next 2 tokens "table=" Illegal expression (MODULO) as lvalue in file ./Configure at line 235, next 2 tokens ");" Illegal modu

Configure linux-mips

1999-03-29 Thread Niels Poppe
There's a bug in Configure line 154: the entry for "linux-mips" has an embedded linefeed because of a line wrap, causing make to choke on it. -- Niels Poppe - org.net bv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Configure.orig Mon Mar 29 21:31:40 1999 +++ Configure Mon Mar 29 21:32:05 1999 @@ -151,8 +151,

ssleay revoke -in

1999-03-29 Thread madwolf
Hi! Here it is the first working version. The base code has been given today afternoon by Pete Brett and required very little work, but it was needed. Now it compiles fine under openssl-0.91c (I had to modify the progs.h adding the revoke_main) just copy the code in the apps dir and make needed

WIN32 Telnet client OPENSSL SSL_connect() failure

1999-03-29 Thread Jeff Roberts
Does anybody have a sample piece of C code that connects to a Telnet server via OPENSSL ? I have attempted to write it myself, however, my call to SSL_connect() fails. After the failure, I call ERR_get_error() and it returns a 0 (no error). My code looks as follows: int NSI_SSL_OPEN(SOCKET

broken demos

1999-03-29 Thread son
The demo programs that came with the source does not compile. for example, in ssl/cli.cpp on line 70, char* str = X509_NAME_oneline (X509_get_subject_name (server_cert)); I looked in ssl.h and there is no such function prototype. I found char* X509_NAME_oneline(X509_name_st *, char *, int) char*

Re: MD5 conflicts?

1999-03-29 Thread Ulf Möller
>I'm hardly an expert on SSLeay/OpenSSL, but how receptive are you guys to >perhaps one of these changes (If yes, I can probably come up with some >diffs)? If the BSD folks make incompatible changes to the definition, they ought to change the name, too. Renaming the structure in OpenSSL is a bad

ANSIfication, SSLeay shared lib support

1999-03-29 Thread Anonymous
BN_mod is prototyped ANSI style in bn.h and defined k&r style in bn_mod.c. That normally doesn't cause any problem because bn_mod.c doesn't include bn.h. But it popped up and choked Solaris's cc when I tried to build shared libs using the old SSLeay method with crypto.c (my own version which I'v

RE: Revokation Utility

1999-03-29 Thread salzr
It should understand multiple CA's via the -name flag. It should take multiple "-in xxx" flags. It should take the "-inform" flag (multiply). That is, the following should work: ssleay revoke -inform DER -in cert.dir -inform PEM -in c2.pem It should take a "-serial nnn" flag to revoke by

CSR generation

1999-03-29 Thread CJ Holmes
I looked around quite a bit in the apps folder, and could not find any examples of CSR generation. I found the certificate signing code, but no CSR code. Can someone point me in the right direction? On another note, I'd like to contribute something to OpenSSL but US law forbids me from exporti

RE: 0.9.2b Sparc problem

1999-03-29 Thread Jon Parry-McCulloch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Any ideas? Yes, I'm a moron. Don't ask... it's _far_ too embarrassing. Jon -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 6.0.2i iQA/AwUBNv+izngWiDO86u4+EQIzKQCeLVGgBCnlvPw8HJiLWqfCWU+vK6AAnioE XErPNztWJ1YPtSYBmCn5OVl1 =4r3V -

Revokation Utility

1999-03-29 Thread madwolf
I have updated a tool to be integrated in the OpenSSL project and it's usage is very simple $ ssleay revoke -in $certificate this will modify the index.txt file to permit the ca -gencrl to be fully working. It's now working on the OpenSSL 0.91.c now i have to download the 0.92b and veri

RE: 0.9.2b Sparc problem

1999-03-29 Thread Jon Parry-McCulloch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -Original Message- From: Albert Max Lai [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 27, 1999 9:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: 0.9.2b Sparc problem On Fri, 26 Mar 1999, Ed Kubaitis wrote: > perl ./Configure no-

re[2]: OpenSSL Error Handling

1999-03-29 Thread Jeff Roberts
Holger, Thank you for your reply ! I have built the WIN32 version of OPENSSL and I do not have a file called error.doc on my hard drive. Can you email me a copy please ? Thank You, Jeff Roberts __ OpenSSL Project

Re: How to Revoke a Certificate ???

1999-03-29 Thread madwolf
Pete Brett wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Mar 1999 20:57:16 +0100, you wrote: > > The index.txt file is made up of a series of lines (one per > certificate issued). Each line contains the following fields: > > 1. Certificate state: This is a single character with 'V' for valid, > 'E' for expired and 'R'

ANNOUNCE: New OpenSSL development team members

1999-03-29 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
The OpenSSL core team is pleased to announce that three additional developers now joined the OpenSSL development team: Bodo Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ulf Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Holger Reif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

0.9.2 under Linux

1999-03-29 Thread GOMEZ Henri
I'm trying to build a RPM for Intel Redhat Linux from spec and patch from 0.9.1. I've got problem with shared libs which seems to forget to compile some BN's. Did we have to add any patch for i386 arch (bn-rec) ? Did we must now compile apps with MONOLITIC or as standalone ? See you. PS: If Linu

Re: How to Revoke a Certificate ???

1999-03-29 Thread Pete Brett
On Fri, 26 Mar 1999 20:57:16 +0100, you wrote: >Hi, > >I have the need to revoke a certificate, anyway I cannot find the revoke >facility to manage the job ( including altering the index.txt that I think >is used to manage the CRL (??)). > I am going from memory here since I have not got any SSL

Re: OpenSSL Error Handling

1999-03-29 Thread Holger Reif
Jeff Roberts schrieb: > > Can anybody tell me how to get and interpret errors in OpenSSL ? For Example I call >SSL_Connect() and get a return code of -1. How do I get the error code and error >string associated with the error, I can't find any documentation on this and all of >the examples d

Re: OpenSSL Error Handling

1999-03-29 Thread Bodo Moeller
Jeff Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Can anybody tell me how to get and interpret errors in OpenSSL ? For > Example I call SSL_Connect() and get a return code of -1. How do I > get the error code and error string associated with the error, I can't > find any documentation on this and all of the

Re: Server certificate chain in TLS.

1999-03-29 Thread Marc Jadoul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Marc Jadoul wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > >From RFC2246 (TLS V1.0) > > > > certificate_list > >This is a sequence (chain) of X.509v3 certificates. The sender's > >certificate must come first in the list. Each following > >certificate must direct