Index: Configure
===
RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/Configure,v
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -r1.35 Configure
--- Configure 1999/04/09 16:25:25 1.35
+++ Configure 1999/04/12 14:15:02
@@ -292,6 +292,11 @@
{
Hi,
Anyone has the success experience to run Cert
management programs under win32 platform.
I have tried, but failed,
when I run openssl req -new -config
/openssl/lib/openssl.cnf -out mycsr.pem
I got a error message "unable to find
'distinguished_name' in config problem make
Certificate
Ahh, I misunderstood what you meant by macros.
I thought you meant things like:
#define sk_X509_push(sk, v) \
sk_push((stack*)sk, (char*)v)
Which is, of course, sub-optimal. Having a bunch of
one-line wrapper functions isn't unreasonable.
On the other hand, since stack.[ch] are so small,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh, I misunderstood what you meant by macros.
I thought you meant things like:
#define sk_X509_push(sk, v) \
sk_push((stack*)sk, (char*)v)
Which is, of course, sub-optimal. Having a bunch of
one-line wrapper functions isn't unreasonable.
Would I do
Ben Laurie wrote:
Don't forget that templates are really just a glorified preprocessor
(well, OK, they aren't now but they were at first) :-)
Seriously, you can do a lot of what templates do with a preprocessor if
you try hard enough. Anyway, the interesting stuff all happens here, in
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
Don't forget that templates are really just a glorified preprocessor
(well, OK, they aren't now but they were at first) :-)
Seriously, you can do a lot of what templates do with a preprocessor if
you try hard enough. Anyway, the
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
4. There is no way to lookup by other methods, for example lookup by
subject key id (needed for proper certificate chain verification) or
lookup by issuer name (needed to find matching certificates in an SSL
client when authentication is requested). To add new lookup
A reasonable idea, but why do you use "-lRSAglue" twice? The correct and
working order should be "-lRSAglue -lrsaref", shouldn't it? Except for this
issue, +1 for the patch.
It should, but Richard Revitte suggested to put it in twice. Richard?
Al Smith reports that RSA fails on IRIX. He does not use RSAREF, nor
any assembler bignum code.
This looks like a serious problem. Any ideas what may go wrong there?
I'm forwarding Al's messages with his permission.
From: Al Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 0.9.2b
Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If everyone thinks it is a terrible idea I'm prepared to undo it. I'll
fight first, though, coz I think it is a great idea :-)
I, for one, do think it is a terrible idea and I "vote against" these
changes. Marvelous macros are neat and all, but
- They
Ben Laurie wrote:
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
4. There is no way to lookup by other methods, for example lookup by
subject key id (needed for proper certificate chain verification) or
lookup by issuer name (needed to find matching certificates in an SSL
client when authentication is
Anonymous wrote:
Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If everyone thinks it is a terrible idea I'm prepared to undo it. I'll
fight first, though, coz I think it is a great idea :-)
I, for one, do think it is a terrible idea and I "vote against" these
changes. Marvelous macros are neat
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
4. There is no way to lookup by other methods, for example lookup by
subject key id (needed for proper certificate chain verification) or
lookup by issuer name (needed to find matching certificates in an SSL
ulf It should, but Richard Revitte suggested to put it in twice. Richard?
I only drew from other projects I've been involved in, where there
were some kind of cross references between two libraries. To solve
such things, the solution is often '-lib1 -lib2 -lib1'. In the
libRSAglue and
Ben Laurie wrote:
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
4. There is no way to lookup by other methods, for example lookup by
subject key id (needed for proper certificate chain verification) or
lookup by issuer name (needed to find matching
ulf It should, but Richard Revitte suggested to put it in twice. Richard?
Did I write that? :) Sorry about the typo.
I only drew from other projects I've been involved in, where there
were some kind of cross references between two libraries. To solve
Ok, then -lRSAglue -lrsaref should be
On Tue, 13 Apr 1999, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
I was thinking more along the lines of the PKCS#11 (but cut down a bit)
to handle this kind of thing where you treat each 'object' as a set of
'attributes' and can search for objects that match a given attribute.
Something like:
int
Hi,
I have solve the problem by myself.
Under Win32, you should use '\' instead of '/'.
and you should change the first few line of
openssl.cnf
because of Win32 does not has ENV:: defination.
cheer.
--- Wu Zhigang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Anyone has the success experience to
OpenSSL STATUS Last modified at
__ $Date: 1999/04/08 20:45:53 $
DEVELOPMENT STATE
o OpenSSL 0.9.3: Under development...
o OpenSSL 0.9.2b: Released on March22th, 1999
o OpenSSL 0.9.1c: Released on December
On Sun, Apr 11, 1999 at 01:17:19PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
(remember that HEADER_ENVELOPE_H is always defined here
because of a previous #include, and that the dummy structure
definitions anyway could fail on some systems because they don't
necessary have the alignment needed for
In an earlier message I discussed what I saw as a serious deficiency
in OpenSSL: its lack of a key, certificate and CRL database API. In this
message I'll mention more info and the general API requirements and why
the nearest thing we have at present is not adequate IMHO.
There is already a
I've been threatening to discuss this for some time. I've been aware of
the problem for some time but more recently it has started to seriously
hamper related development. Anyway here goes...
Currently there is IMHO a big problem in the way OpenSSL handles private
keys, certificates and CRLs. At
22 matches
Mail list logo
