Re: CRL Reason Code

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Is there a way to add the revocation reason code to a CRL generated by OpenSSL??? Not using "openssl ca -gencrl" generated CRLs: this would need a couple of extra fields in the text database. If you are generating CRLs in some other way then you can use the extension code to manually

Re: CRL Reason Code

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Dror Otmi wrote: Is there a way to add the revocation reason code to a CRL generated by OpenSSL??? Not using "openssl ca -gencrl" generated CRLs: this would need a couple of extra fields in the text database. If you are generating CRLs in some other way then you can use the

Re: Buglet in dsa_sign.c

1999-06-25 Thread Bodo Moeller
On Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 02:34:03PM +0100, Chad C. Mulligan wrote: I've noticed that there is a memory leak in dsa_sign.c The BN* kinv is not being freed before the function exits; Thanks for pointing this out. After verifying that fix I found another memory hole, and noticed that the

Re: Buglet in dsa_sign.c

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Bodo Moeller schrieb: Thanks for pointing this out. After verifying that fix I found another memory hole, and noticed that the openssl.c application did not really enable memory hole checks (CRYPTO_MEM_CHECK_ON should be ..._ENABLE) -- does anyone know what reason this could have? Seems

How to convert MULTILINE Netscape SPKAC to SINGLELINE SPKAC string?

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
HI! Does anybody know how to convert multiline NETSCAPE SPKAC string to singlline NETSCAPE SPKAC string? For next use with openssl ( openssl -spkac spkac.reg out new.req ) Tahanks you Ivo MACHULDA __ OpenSSL Project

Re: Buglet in dsa_sign.c

1999-06-25 Thread Bodo Moeller
On Fri, Jun 25, 1999 at 04:36:06PM +0200, Holger Reif wrote: Bodo Moeller schrieb: [...] noticed that the openssl.c application did not really enable memory hole checks (CRYPTO_MEM_CHECK_ON should be ..._ENABLE) -- does anyone know what reason this could have? Seems you

Creating and self signing an X509 Cert?

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Hi there folks! I was wondering if someone could help me out in creating an x509 cert and self signing it.? This is how I tried to do it: --Made DSA --Created key pair --Created x509 cert --stuffed pub key in the x509 cert --stuffed misc. info into cert -- name, etc.. --signed the cert with its

Re: default to cc instead of gcc?

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "Mixmaster" == Mixmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Mixmaster It looks like cc is now preferred over gcc on the most common platforms Mixmaster where both might be available (like Solaris and HPUX), and that systems Mixmaster where gcc is better will either have