Raghuram Belur [EMAIL PROTECTED] in ulf.openssl.dev:
We have an application for which we are using SSL enabled clients and
servers(our own server not a web server). I have been trying to get the
session key reuse going for the past several days. [...]
Use SSL_CTX_set_session_id_context().
Hello,
I have some problem to compile the openssl-0.9.4. I'll be very glad
if you could help me. The Configure script runs without problem (I use
the command: ./Configure -L/usr/local/lib linux-elf, cause there are
the new version libraries), but make gives
this output:
/usr/lib/crt1.o: In
appro As result of added support for Unixware 7 ./config believes that even
appro Solaris is Unixware 7. Well, as a matter of fact ./config will recognize
appro *any* system which implements 'uname -X' and has 5 in release number as
appro Unixware. In order to fix the problem I'd really love
appro Well, it's a way to automatically select between -X and others
That was the purpose. That way we ultimately don't need to case
statements.
appro (and there is shorter way, e.g. `(uname -X | awk
appro '/Machine/{print $3;exit 1}' uname -m) 2/dev/null` :-).
I bow to the master.
appro At
fresh install of redhat6.0
[root@enigma openssl-0.9.5beta1]# gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs
gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
[root@enigma openssl-0.9.5beta1]# ld -v
GNU ld version 2.9.1 (with BFD 2.9.1.0.23)
appro The second beta release of OpenSSL 0.9.5 is now available from the
appro OpenSSL FTP site URL: ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/. This is the
appro final beta. If it's all working, the release won't differ
appro except for the version number.
appro ^^ We ought to fix ./config on
sure you can -- set the cipherspec.
and if you have to suppoer "legacy browsers" you need to.
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, [iso-8859-1] Ulf Möller wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 08:32:05PM -0800, Will wrote:
I've looked through the documentation, but I can't seem to
find how to build an
uname -X on SCO OpenServer(TM) Release 5 gives:
System = SCO_SV
Node = midas
Release = 3.2v5.0.4
KernelID = 97/05/07
Machine = Pentium
BusType = ISA
Serial = 2EI049692
Users = 5-user
OEM# = 0
Origin# = 1
NumCPU = 1
The contributor also said "fortunately, that's the only SCO system we
appro At the very least we have to know what does 'uname -s' or
appro 'uname -X | awk '/System/{print$2}' return on UnixWare.
Yup. I'm currently asking arond in other fora. Hopefully there will
be an answer tonight.
Check out http://uw7doc.sco.com/cgi-bin/man/man?uname+1, which states
appro Check out http://uw7doc.sco.com/cgi-bin/man/man?uname+1, which states
appro that -X is a *undocumented* legacy option. According to the page 'uname
Hmm, yep, looks like they wanna use -f instead...
It's quite probable that uname works correctly nowadays, the
"braindamage" may be
As a consequence of what Andy and I have discussed, I asked my friend
to try uname with -s, -r, -v and -m:
midas# uname -s
SCO_SV
midas# uname -r
3.2
midas# uname -v
2
midas# uname -m
i386
So that's how it's braindamaged. The release number is apparently
incomplete (compare with what's given
Is there a reason why not to just import the guess-system-type stuff
from Gnu autoconf? Surely our creativity is better spent elsewhere?
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development
Lutz.Jaenicke Passes on:
Lutz.Jaenicke platform: hpux-parisc-cc
Lutz.Jaenicke and (this time also checked):
Lutz.Jaenicke platform: hpux-parisc-gcc
Thanks.
Out of curiosity, which version of HP-UX?
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35
salzr Is there a reason why not to just import the guess-system-type stuff
salzr from Gnu autoconf? Surely our creativity is better spent elsewhere?
Got the same comment from a friend just a minute ago. Yes, of course
we should look in config.guess. I guess we just didn't think of that.
I'll
I know I shouldn't have left this until now, but I'd quite like to
commit this change I've accidentally left lying around, which allows a
certificate age check:
Index: apps/x509.c
===
RCS file: /e/openssl/cvs/openssl/apps/x509.c,v
unixware problem hopefulyl solved. I looked at GuessOS in APache
1.3.1 and saw the light :-).
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 05:39:25PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
Lutz.Jaenicke Passes on:
Lutz.Jaenicke platform: hpux-parisc-cc
Lutz.Jaenicke and (this time also checked):
Lutz.Jaenicke platform: hpux-parisc-gcc
Thanks.
Out of curiosity, which version of HP-UX?
10.20
I wonder, wouldn't config and changes in it be a bit easier if we
could just use (import, basically) GuessOS from Apache and replace the
currently included GuessOS with something like this:
./GuessOS 2/dev/null | (
followed by the rest of config?
It feels a bit clumsy, the way it is
ben I know I shouldn't have left this until now, but I'd quite like to
ben commit this change I've accidentally left lying around, which allows a
ben certificate age check:
I can't tell you what to do, but I'd prefer if you didn't before the
release. Your call.
--
Richard Levitte \
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
ben I know I shouldn't have left this until now, but I'd quite like to
ben commit this change I've accidentally left lying around, which allows a
ben certificate age check:
I can't tell you what to do, but I'd prefer if you didn't before the
release.
Andrew W. Gray wrote:
Electric Fence 2.0.5 Copyright (C) 1987-1998 Bruce Perens.
test BN_add
test BN_sub
test BN_lshift1
test BN_lshift (fixed)
test BN_lshift
test BN_rshift1
test BN_rshift
test BN_sqr
test BN_mul
ElectricFence Aborting: Allocating 0 bytes, probably a bug.
Ben Laurie wrote:
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
ben I know I shouldn't have left this until now, but I'd quite like to
ben commit this change I've accidentally left lying around, which allows a
ben certificate age check:
I can't tell you what to do, but I'd prefer if you
ben Ah, but you can - or I wouldn't have asked. :-)
In that case, I trust my statement of preference was enough :-)
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53
Ben Laurie wrote:
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
ben I know I shouldn't have left this until now, but I'd quite like to
ben commit this change I've accidentally left lying around, which allows a
ben certificate age check:
I can't tell you what to do, but I'd prefer if you
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
ben I know I shouldn't have left this until now, but I'd quite like to
ben commit this change I've accidentally left lying around, which allows a
ben certificate age check:
I can't tell you
Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You might want to go to http://www.cryptosavvy.com/suggestions.htm and show
your boss that 4096 bit RSA is approximately equivalent in strength to
150-160 bit keysize symmetric ciphers. [...]
Their estimate is not that 4096 bit RSA is as strong as 150-160 bit
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 06:37:57PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
I can't tell you what to do, but I'd prefer if you didn't before the
release. Your call.
Me too. Or else delay the release for a day or two so it can be tested
on all those compilers.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 10:35:16AM -0500, Rich Salz wrote:
sure you can -- set the cipherspec.
and if you have to suppoer "legacy browsers" you need to.
But that wouldn't have made OpenSSL exportable under the old
regulations, would it?
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 11:33:49AM -0500, Rich Salz wrote:
Is there a reason why not to just import the guess-system-type stuff
from Gnu autoconf? Surely our creativity is better spent elsewhere?
Last time I checked, the license allowed that only if the entire
package is configured by
Rich Salz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've looked through the documentation, but I can't seem to
find how to build an exportable (40 bit) version of OpenSSL?
You can't, but the new regulations don't have that limit anyway.
sure you can -- set the cipherspec.
You cannot build a 40-bit version of
OpenSSL STATUS Last modified at
__ $Date: 2000/02/27 18:55:01 $
DEVELOPMENT STATE
o OpenSSL 0.9.5: Under development...
0.9.5-beta1 was available.
Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 -
I've just compiled openssl-0.9.5beta2 without trouble on
solaris-sparcv9-gcc and linux-elf (Redhat 5.2 and 6.1).
The solaris had to be told that it wasn't unixware, but
I suppose that should be fixed by now.
vh.
Mads Toftum, MT165-RIPE
--
Cynic, n.:
A blackguard whose faulty vision
Am Son, 27 Feb 2000 schrieb Richard Levitte:
The second beta release of OpenSSL 0.9.5 is now available from the
OpenSSL FTP site URL: ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/. This is the
final beta. If it's all working, the release won't differ except for
the version number.
The release of OpenSSL 0.9.5
Ulf Möller wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 06:37:57PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
I can't tell you what to do, but I'd prefer if you didn't before the
release. Your call.
Me too. Or else delay the release for a day or two so it can be tested
on all those compilers.
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
ben I know I shouldn't have left this until now, but I'd quite like to
ben commit this change I've accidentally left lying around, which allows a
ben certificate age check:
I can't tell you
What you are saying ist that OpenSSL is able to interoperate with
40-bit SSL clients and servers. That's true, but it is not what the
question was about.
Oops.
Sorry for the misleading answer.
__
OpenSSL Project
This is classical VARARGS thing..
With patch below the thing compiles and 'make test' succeeds.
$ gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/alpha-redhat-linux/2.96/specs
gcc version 2.96 2125 (experimental)
gcc -I.. -I../../include -mcpu=ev56 -O3 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -c -o b_print.o
jonessk gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
That's a SIGSEGV. What version of gcc was that?
There are two things that I can think of that you might need to do:
1. free up memory. that signal could be because it ran out of swap
space.
2. upgrade gcc, it
Steve,
Have you looked into the requirements w.r.t. posting code from a US company?
Specifically, I think you have to post to BXA as well.
Ron.
-Original Message-
From: Reddie, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, 25 February 2000 11:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Joerg
FreeBSD 4.0-RC2 (release candidate 2) compiles and tests fine (i586). This
is semi-significant since OpenSSL 0.9.4 is now included in the FreeBSD
base system, so there are no conflicts etc.
Nice work, guys! I look forward to integrating 0.9.5 into FreeBSD when it
comes out (unfortunately it
Reddie, Steven wrote:
I create my own RSA_METHOD structure which contains pointers to my RSA
public/private encrypt/decrypt functions. It also contains a flags member
which is where I set RSA_METHOD_FLAG_NO_CHECK. I have the private key
stored on the Hardware Security Module (HSM) and the
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
jonessk gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11
That's a SIGSEGV. What version of gcc was that?
There are two things that I can think of that you might need to do:
1. free up memory. that signal could
Hello, Im Brady Moritz and I just subscribed to the list.
Im planning to do some development for my website using OpenSSL but wanted
to check with ya'll first to see if something isn't out there already which
will do the job I need.
Basically Im wanting to build a COM object that can connect
43 matches
Mail list logo
