[ftm@uk2.net: Updating OpenSSL on RedHat 7.3]

2002-06-10 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
- Forwarded message from root [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2002 16:43:05 -0300 From: root [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-3 i686) X-Accept-Language: en To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Updating OpenSSL on RedHat 7.3 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS

Re: make depend from Configure?

2002-06-10 Thread Ulf Möller
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 09:23:05AM -0700, Tim Rice wrote: Currently 'make depend' uses makedepend which is part of X11. While it may be likely that development machines have X, there may be people building OpenSSL on machines with no X. Also I think makedepend doesn't produce the exact same

Re: make depend from Configure?

2002-06-10 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 9 Jun 2002 20:35:31 -0400 (EDT), Rich Salz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rsalz If makedepend is not found, perhaps a pointer to sources to build one. rsalz rsalz Or, since perl is already required, include a quick perl script that does rsalz 70% of the job.

extdat.h

2002-06-10 Thread Peter Sylvester
It seems that in the latest snapshots in crypto/x509v3/ext_dat.h, the table standard_exts ist not sorted correctly. crl_hold should be after sinfo. v3_crl_hold : #define NID_hold_instruction_code430 v3_sinfo : #define NID_sinfo_access 398 I haven't checked

[openssl.org #91] extdat.h

2002-06-10 Thread Peter Sylvester via RT
It seems that in the latest snapshots in crypto/x509v3/ext_dat.h, the table standard_exts ist not sorted correctly. crl_hold should be after sinfo. v3_crl_hold : #define NID_hold_instruction_code430 v3_sinfo : #define NID_sinfo_access 398 I haven't checked

openssl.exe 0.9.6a

2002-06-10 Thread Daniela Prestipino
Hi, Where/How can I find the openssl.exe (application file) in the 0.9.6a version? Thanks Daniela -- Daniela Prestipino [EMAIL PROTECTED] I.D.S., Informatica Distribuita e Software srl Via Consolare Pompea 19 98168 Messina ITALIA Tel.: +39 90 353638 Fax : +39

Various patches for 0.9.6d and 0.9.7-beta1

2002-06-10 Thread ross . alexander
Hello, I have two patches for hpux64-parisc-gcc support in Configure and one to correct an error in evp_test.c, which calls strsep instead of sstrsep (09.7-beta1 only). (See attached file: openssl-0.9.7-beta1.patch)(See attached file: openssl-0.9.6d.patch)(See attached file:

Re: Various patches for 0.9.6d and 0.9.7-beta1

2002-06-10 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01:52:12PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have two patches for hpux64-parisc-gcc support in Configure and one to correct an error in evp_test.c, which calls strsep instead of sstrsep (09.7-beta1 only). Thanks. The strsep issue is already fixed in the current tree.

Re: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl

2002-06-10 Thread afchine madjlessi
Richard Levitte via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. Those extra functions in the RSA method, are they really needed? I understand that they provide a lot of automagic things, but then it should be added in the ENGINE framework as something that would be potentially available for any

Re: Various patches for 0.9.6d and 0.9.7-beta1

2002-06-10 Thread ross . alexander
Lutz, I think the problem is because 32bit HP uses the SOM object format and 64bit HP uses ELF. These are quite different and hence gcc cannot be configured for both targets. So when you build gcc it is a different target (hppa64-hp-hpux11.00) for 64bit than 32bit (hppa2.0n-hp-hpux11.00). NB

Re: Various patches for 0.9.6d and 0.9.7-beta1

2002-06-10 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 03:06:22PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the problem is because 32bit HP uses the SOM object format and 64bit HP uses ELF. These are quite different and hence gcc cannot be configured for both targets. So when you build gcc it is a different target

Re: Various patches for 0.9.6d and 0.9.7-beta1

2002-06-10 Thread ross . alexander
So the entries you supplied are for gcc (hppa64-hp-hpux11.00)? Is there a way for config to find out itself? Please have a look into config and search for GCC_ARCH to see what I mean. Sure. It will take me a couple of days. In GCC 3.1 gcc --version doesn't work the same way so I will

Re: Various patches for 0.9.6d and 0.9.7-beta1

2002-06-10 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 03:44:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So the entries you supplied are for gcc (hppa64-hp-hpux11.00)? Is there a way for config to find out itself? Please have a look into config and search for GCC_ARCH to see what I mean. Sure. It will take me a couple of

Re: [openssl.org #80] [Lutz.Jaenicke@aet.TU-Cottbus.DE: Re: Naina announce (was: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.1 beta 1 released)]

2002-06-10 Thread Lutz Jaenicke via RT
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:33:25AM +0200, Vadim Fedukovich via RT wrote: patch to add SET-specific objects is attached. It's rather large, still it would let to build Naina without modifying openssl code. I have made some further modifications: I did not like the direct use of 2 23 42 for SET

Re: make depend from Configure?

2002-06-10 Thread Rich Salz
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: rsalz Or, since perl is already required, include a quick perl script that does rsalz 70% of the job. Hmm, that could possibly be done... Do you have something ready? Attached. Hope it's useful. /r$ #! /usr/bin/env perl -- ## Rough tool

Re: Various patches for 0.9.6d and 0.9.7-beta1

2002-06-10 Thread ross . alexander
Lutz, I've picked up the snapshot. There is a problem with the new code. GCCVER=`(gcc --version) 2/dev/null | head -1` if [ $GCCVER != ]; then CC=gcc # then strip off whatever prefix Cygnus as well as GCC 3.1 prepends # the number with... Hopefully, this will work for any future

Re: Various patches for 0.9.6d and 0.9.7-beta1

2002-06-10 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 04:53:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've picked up the snapshot. There is a problem with the new code. GCCVER=`(gcc --version) 2/dev/null | head -1` if [ $GCCVER != ]; then CC=gcc # then strip off whatever prefix Cygnus as well as GCC 3.1 prepends #

Re: [openssl.org #80] [Lutz.Jaenicke@aet.TU-Cottbus.DE: Re: Naina announce (was: [ANNOUNCE] OpenSSL 0.9.1 beta 1 released)]

2002-06-10 Thread Vadim Fedukovich
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 05:42:42PM +0200, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote: On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 09:33:25AM +0200, Vadim Fedukovich via RT wrote: patch to add SET-specific objects is attached. It's rather large, still it would let to build Naina without modifying openssl code. I have made

Prototypes SSL_write() SSL_read() problem in openssl/ssl.h for 64-bit applications

2002-06-10 Thread dbroady
The prototype for SSL_write() and SSL_read() both have their last parameters to be int. I believe that this last parameter needs to be of type size_t. Two reasons for doing this: 1) This will allow applications to be compiled in either 32-bit or 64-bit mode without any warnings from

Re: Prototypes SSL_write() SSL_read() problem in openssl/ssl.h for 64-bit applications

2002-06-10 Thread dbroady
The same also goes for CRYPTO_malloc(int, char *, int). It probably should be CRYPTO_malloc(size_t, char *, int). The same would go for CRYPTO_realloc() and CRYPTO_remalloc(). Darin Broady [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lexmark International, Inc.

Re: make depend from Configure?

2002-06-10 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 10 Jun 2002 11:46:49 -0400, Rich Salz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rsalz Attached. Hope it's useful. Unfortunately no. We need one that works a little more lika a preprocessor, so macros are actually taken into account. Think excluded algorithms. -- Richard

Re: Various patches for 0.9.6d and 0.9.7-beta1

2002-06-10 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 10 Jun 2002 18:03:43 +0200, Lutz Jaenicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Lutz.Jaenicke On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 04:53:36PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lutz.Jaenicke I've picked up the snapshot. There is a problem with the new code. Lutz.Jaenicke