Hi,
Do openssl have a utility to create and manage
delta CLRs?
Mehdi Jabalameli [EMAIL PROTECTED]ce.sharif.edu/~jabalameli
On 05 June 2002, Richard Levitte wrote:
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jun 4 19:47:39 2002]:
>
> > Building 0.9.7 (snapshot from June 1) with Cygwin led to several
> > warnings during compilation related to the assembly code now included
> > by default. Despite the warnings, it passed the tests in
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, [ISO-8859-15] Götz Babin-Ebell wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> There is a possible problem with the string param handling of ENGINE_ctrl():
> (At least I will get a problem...)
>
> In the ..._ctrl()-Function of the engines a passed string
> is only referenced and not copyed.
>
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 12:14:00PM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
> > Using "const unsigned char **", however, is not 100% api-compatible, because
> > you can't safely pass an "unsigned char **" to it, for complicated reasons
> > explained in the URL I sent earlier.
>
> [http://www.geocrawler.com/a
Avery Pennarun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 01:26:42PM +0200, Bodo Moeller via RT wrote:
>> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 6 18:39:34 2002]:
>>> It appears the openssl guys goofed in 0.97beta. The prototype for the
>>> d2i_RSAPrivateKey function in 0.9.6c, which I use, is like
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 12:14:00PM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
> > Using "const unsigned char **", however, is not 100% api-compatible, because
> > you can't safely pass an "unsigned char **" to it, for complicated reasons
> > explained in the URL I sent earlier.
>
> [http://www.geocrawler.com/ar
Taking some very quickly planned vacation. I'll be back june 24th.
Unfortunately, it means that any patching that's expected of me won't
be done before then.
Happy hacking.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree that simply using -dumpversion makes more sense, on the
assumption that it will always only output the number.
"--version" appears to be intended to be human-readable, not
machine-readable, and its format may change at any time, as it
just did. Why keep adding sed commands that say, "oh,
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
>There will not be another release of 0.9.6 before 0.9.7 will be out.
>We still maintain the 0.9.6 tree, because we anticipate that due to
>incompatible changes between 0.9.6 and 0.9.7 several people will stay
>with 0.9.6x for some more time, so we
Avery Pennarun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 01:26:42PM +0200, Bodo Moeller via RT wrote:
>> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 6 18:39:34 2002]:
>>> It appears the openssl guys goofed in 0.97beta. The prototype for the
>>> d2i_RSAPrivateKey function in 0.9.6c, which I use, is like t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 14 Jun 2002 21:14:43 +0200
(METDST), "Lutz Jaenicke via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> Richard: you seem to have a beta version of 3.1.1 around. Will its
rt> output for -dumpversion somehow fit into the model?
: ; gcc -dumpversion
3.1.1
I see no pro
Monacohi all,
i'm trying to build openssl-0.9.7-beta1 on OSX 10.1.4, but make is dying at an
undefined symbol of "_ftime".
as "_ftime" is not implemented/deprecated on Darwin, my understanding was that
"-DUSE_TOD" was supposed to circumvent this problem .
unfortunately, a configure/bu
13 matches
Mail list logo
