> I have been working on
> BN assembler aided implementation that would need some benchmarking. It
> should give around 3x speed-up...
Preliminary patch relative to 0.9.6h is available at
http://www.openssl.org/~appro/. Once it's confirmed to be working on
real hardware, it will be ported/merged t
Hi,
* Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The CHIL interface was once meant as some kind of general purpose
> library to access certain functions in a cipher box or smart card.
> For that reason, it asks for mutex callbacks exactly like OpenSSL
> does (and probably for the s
In message <20021211162914.GA1042@debbie> on Wed, 11 Dec 2002 11:29:14 -0500, Geoff
Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
geoff> Just catching up on all this, but something seems a bit strange to me
geoff> about the fundamental reliance on OpenSSL-sponsored dynamic locks. The
geoff> point is this: ENG
Hi there,
* Bertie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> At 10:00 AM 12/11/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> >bertie> Yep, this solution works if you are an application developer
> >bertie> wanting to use chil engine. This is not much help if you are
> >bertie> say an Apache user who wanted
I've now got OpenSSL 0.6.9h compiling and testing fine using Watcom
11.0c under Win2k, as a static library with and without the optimized
assembly. In the process, I've come across a few minor problems:
.\crypto\des\ecb_enc.c(96): Warning! W201: Unreachable code
if (sizeof(DES_LONG) != sizeof(long
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:14:13PM -0800, Sunitha Kumar wrote:
> > Or, a more consise list with only AES,
> > /usr/local/ssl/bin/openssl ciphers -tls1
> > AES
> > ADH-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA:
> > AES256-SHA:ADH-AES128
Richard Levitte wrote:
Hello Richard,
OpenSSL CVS Repository
http://cvs.openssl.org/
Server: cvs.openssl.org Name: Richard Levitte
Root: /e/openssl/cvs Email: [EMAIL PRO
At 10:16 AM 12/11/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>I'll ponder and get back to you later today.
Thanks,
Bertie
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
> ... use up
> every damn register and it's really tight there. Now what would it take
> to PIC-ify the code? Most likely an extra register! The one you'll be
> calculating offsets from. And the problem is that there is no register
> to spare ... good news are that there is only one [DES]
> module
I'll ponder and get back to you later today.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mem
At 10:00 AM 12/11/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 11
Dec 2002 08:56:19 +, Bertie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>bertie> Yep, this solution works if you are an application developer
>bertie> wanting to use chil engine. This is not much help if
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 11 Dec 2002
08:56:19 +, Bertie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
bertie> Yep, this solution works if you are an application developer
bertie> wanting to use chil engine. This is not much help if you are
bertie> say an Apache user who wanted to use an nCipher HSM
At 09:36 AM 12/11/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 11
Dec 2002 08:24:47 +, Bertie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>bertie> In view of the fact that the chil engine code is only
>bertie> threadsafe if the dynlock callbacks are implemented, and th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 11 Dec 2002
08:24:47 +, Bertie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
bertie> In view of the fact that the chil engine code is only
bertie> threadsafe if the dynlock callbacks are implemented, and that
bertie> it is unlikely that openssl application developers will g
I got the error below after running make.
%> cd /usr/local/src/openssl-0.9.6h
%> ./config
%> make
ld: Undefined symbols:
_OPENSSL_cleanse
make[2]: *** [openssl] Error 1
make[1]: *** [sub_all] Error 1
Anyone have any ideas on how to fix this?
Attached is the full make report
___
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 02:14:13PM -0800, Sunitha Kumar wrote:
> Or, a more consise list with only AES,
> /usr/local/ssl/bin/openssl ciphers -tls1
> AES
> ADH-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA:
> AES256-SHA:ADH-AES128-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA:
> AES128-SHA
> and, I
>bertie> BTW: You never replied to the mail with subject "Requiring
>bertie> multithreaded apps to provide dynamic locking upcalls" was
>bertie> this because you agreed with it :-)
>
>Not really. It's more like "haven't quite had the time to really read
>it, have marked it for later processing"...
Or, a more consise list with only AES,
/usr/local/ssl/bin/openssl ciphers -tls1
AES
ADH-AES256-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA:
AES256-SHA:ADH-AES128-SHA:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA:
AES128-SHA
and, I don't find RSA_WITH_AES_128_SHA. Anybody have any pointers? thanks much,
S
18 matches
Mail list logo
