[PATCH] ASN1_TIME_to_generalizedtime()

2003-01-01 Thread Frederik Vermeulen
The ASN1_TIME_to_generalizedtime() function in openssl 0.9.7 generates a \0-terminated string instead of Z-terminated. Problem becomes apparent when making an openssl ocsp server and client communicate. The client gives a OCSP_R_ERROR_IN_THISUPDATE_FIELD error. Frederik diff -ur

0.9.7 compilation problem with Borland C++ 5.5 and NASM 0.98.35

2003-01-01 Thread Frédéric L. W. Meunier
Windows XP Professional SP1 with all updates. I used: perl Configure BC-32 no-idea no-mdc2 no-rc5 ms\do_nasm.bat make -f ms\bcb.mak The error: bcc32 -otmp32\x_all.obj -Iinc32 -Itmp32 -DWIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN -q -w-aus -w-par -w-inl -c -tWC -tWM -DOPENSSL_SYSNAME_WIN32

Re: [openssl.org #427] OpenSSL 0.9.7 FreeBSD/SPARC problems

2003-01-01 Thread Kris Kennaway via RT
On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 04:25:38AM +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Dec 31 13:23:43 2002]: This patch appears to fix it (I stole the OpenBSD-sparc64 config target). OpenSSL builds and passes 'make test'. Looks not too bad. I'm a little worried with the

Re: Certificate Request Error

2003-01-01 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 08:00:52PM -0600, Kenneth R. Robinette wrote: I am getting an error with OpenSSL 0.9.7 when trying to generate a certificate. It appears that the uniqueIdentifier is no longer valid. Is this correct? From the FAQ:

Re: [openssl.org #423] openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20021229: lddproblems

2003-01-01 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 1 Jan 2003 13:36:23 +0100 (MET), Jeff A. Earickson via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt man crle on a Sun box. It is: Not on the machine I currently have access to :-): $ man crle No manual entry for crle. rt crle - configure runtime linking environment rt

Re: [openssl.org #428] Patch for unused files

2003-01-01 Thread Gisle Vanem
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: levitte Please name it. The reason that I ask you is that the changes you levitte propose are already present in 0.9.7 and 0.9.8-dev. Or is your patch a reverse patch? No, not a reverse patch. The snapshot I diff'ed against was

Re: [openssl.org #425] Build error on Windows NT4?

2003-01-01 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
cl ... -c .\crypto\asn1\n_pkey.c .\crypto\asn1\n_pkey.c(96) : error C2370: 'NETSCAPE_ENCRYPTED_PKEY_it' : redefinition; different storage class .\crypto\asn1\n_pkey.c(93) : see declaration of 'NETSCAPE_ENCRYPTED_PKEY_it' Strange, I checked VC++ 6.0 SP3 and had no

Re: [openssl.org #425] Build error on Windows NT4?

2003-01-01 Thread Jeffrey Altman
Andy Polyakov via RT wrote: cl ... -c .\crypto\asn1\n_pkey.c .\crypto\asn1\n_pkey.c(96) : error C2370: 'NETSCAPE_ENCRYPTED_PKEY_it' : redefinition; different storage class .\crypto\asn1\n_pkey.c(93) : see declaration of 'NETSCAPE_ENCRYPTED_PKEY_it'

Re: [openssl.org #428] Patch for unused files

2003-01-01 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message 015701c2b1a4$1dcef310$[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 1 Jan 2003 15:43:14 +0100, Gisle Vanem [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: giva Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: giva giva levitte Please name it. The reason that I ask you is that the changes you giva levitte propose are