[steve - Fri Jan 10 01:33:03 2003]:
> I've managed to download SP5 and the processor add on pack.
>
> With VC++ 6.0 and SP5 only it passes all tests.
>
> With VC++ 6.0, SP5 and processor add on it misbehaves and things like
> AES give invalid results.
>
> After playing around with various opti
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 10 21:48:32 2003]:
>
> I tried 0.9.7 before succesfully compiling 0.9.6h.
>
> As Doug Kaufman suggested for some reason asn1t.h doesn't get
> included. I
> had to manually edit a dozen source files.
>
> I also have Cygwin in c:\cygwin, but my PATH shows:
>
>
PATH=
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Jan 13 18:47:42 2003]:
> "openssl ca" is one of them, and probably the most cumbersome.
> "openssl req -new -out $FILE" does not verify that $FILE is a writable
> file.
I suspected 'openssl ca' was one of them.
As to the 'openssl req' example you give, so what? The pro
"Richard Levitte via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would be good to know exactly which openssl commands are involved
> in this issue. I'm pretty sure this issue only applies for some of
> them.
"openssl ca" is one of them, and probably the most cumbersome.
"openssl req -new -out $FILE" d
I just applied your patch and will commit soon. Please check tomorrows snapshot.
This ticket is now resolved.
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Jan 5 10:50:22 2003]:
> Some test-files include a protype for read(). Unfortunately this
> protype doesn't
> match the one in djgpp's . Can we not removed thi
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 10 15:08:41 2003]:
It would be good to know exactly which openssl commands are involved in this issue.
I'm pretty sure this issue only applies for some of them.
--
Richard Levitte
__
OpenSSL Proje
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 10 15:09:40 2003]:
It's correct, recertification doesn't work very well. A change would however mean
making a substantial change to the database (index.txt), which makes it too
complicated to get into the 0.9.7 branch.
I'm planning to work on changing this behavio
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Jan 12 23:00:22 2003]:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Andy Polyakov wrote:
>
> > > dkaufman> I noticed that the makefile contains a special line for
> > > dkaufman> DJGPP, similar to the one for Cygwin. This isn't needed for
> > > dkaufman> DJGPP. Patch attached.
> > >
> > > Pl
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Megele, Martin wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Tim Rice wrote:
> > > On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Megele, Martin via RT wrote:
> > >
> > > > Undefined first referenced
> > > > symbol in file
> > > > strcasecmp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:40:26
+0100 (MET), "Jacques A. Vidrine via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> UI_add_input_string
rt> Comment says `Returns the index to the place in the stack or 0 for
rt> error.' --> zero for error
Ah, that comment is in
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:40:26
+0100 (MET), "Jacques A. Vidrine via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rt> UI_add_input_string
rt> Comment says `Returns the index to the place in the stack or 0 for
rt> error.' --> zero for error
Ah, that comment is inc
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 13 Jan 2003 15:36:40
+0100, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
vinschen> in the meantime I released Cygwin's openssl using the above
vinschen> packaging scheme. Would you mind to revert the cygwin.sh
vinschen> changes? The following patch should do
On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 03:16:46PM +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for the report. Unfortunately, your conclusions are
> incorrect. The functions that you spotted in ui_lib.c return the
> expected values, it's UI_UTIL_read_pw() that interprets those values
> incorrectl
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 07:27:35PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > [...]
> Hi, I have chosen another packaging method:
>
> Version 0.9.6h will consist only of the needed DLLs to link applications
> build against it.
>
> The package will be called
>
> openssl096-0.9.6h-1.tar.bz2
>
>
Hello,
Thanks for the report. Unfortunately, your conclusions are incorrect. The functions
that you spotted in ui_lib.c return the expected values, it's UI_UTIL_read_pw() that
interprets those values incorrectly.
I'm committing a change that should fix this. Please try tomorrows snapshot.
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Tim Rice wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Megele, Martin via RT wrote:
> >
> > > Undefined first referenced
> > > symbol in file
> > > strcasecmp ca.o
> >
> > Try adding -lresolv
> >
> > > ftime
> > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 3 06:45:12 2003]:
> >
> > > I'm trying to compile 0.9.7 with Borland C++ 5.5 and NASM 0.98.35 on
> > > Windows XP Professional SP1 with all updates.
> > >
> > > .\crypto\x509\x_all.c:
> > > Error E2450 .\crypto\x509\x_all.c 72: Undefined structure
> > 'AS
> > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 3 06:45:12 2003]:
> >
> > > I'm trying to compile 0.9.7 with Borland C++ 5.5 and NASM 0.98.35 on
> > > Windows XP Professional SP1 with all updates.
> > >
> > > .\crypto\x509\x_all.c:
> > > Error E2450 .\crypto\x509\x_all.c 72: Undefined structure
> > 'ASN
> > > (cd asm; /usr/local/bin/perl des-586.pl cpp >dx86unix.cpp)
> > > gcc -E -DOUT asm/dx86unix.cpp | as -o asm/dx86-out.o
> > > des-586.s: Assembler messages:
> > > des-586.s:2458: Error: Unimplemented segment type 0 in parse_operand
> > > des-586.s:2645: Error: Unimplemented segment type 0 in p
[ Sorry if you see this twice. I missed the existence of the RT alias
before sending this to openssl-dev earlier. ]
Hello,
Regarding openssl 0.9.7:
When using OPENSSL_DES_LIBDES_COMPATIBILITY, I noticed that
`des_read_pw_string' was not functioning. I tracked this down to a
bug in crypto/ui
20 matches
Mail list logo
