[openssl.org #677] bug report - Memory leak in DSA_free() call.

Memory leak in DSA_free() call in dsa_lib.c Version : openssl-0.9.6c. But the same exists in openssl-0.9.7b Description : method_mont_p member of DSA struct is not freed. The call stack shows dsa_do_sign-DSA_sign_setup-dsa_sign_setup-BN_MONT_CTX_new-CRYPTO_malloc-malloc - 72 bytes

Re: [openssl.org #677] bug report - Memory leak in DSA_free() call.

On Friday 15 August 2003 09:13, Leenex Gomes via RT wrote: Memory leak in DSA_free() call in dsa_lib.c Version : openssl-0.9.6c. But the same exists in openssl-0.9.7b Description : method_mont_p member of DSA struct is not freed. That's strange as this should be done by

Re: [openssl.org #676] Small OpenSSL

David == Ahrens, David (David) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: David Can you resend the attachment. I didn't receive it. I'm very David interested in a smaller openssl library. Do you have any David memory profiles, statistics on the amount of size reduction David you were able to achieve? The

Re: select patches for DOS

I didn't get any reaction on this patch. Isn't 32-bit MSDOS targets considered good enough any longer? The original message and patch is here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssl-devm=105943488203763w=2 --gv __ OpenSSL

Re: select patches for DOS

In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 15 Aug 2003 15:31:20 +0200, Gisle Vanem [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: giva I didn't get any reaction on this patch. Isn't 32-bit MSDOS giva targets considered good enough any longer? Nope, I think it's just summer, and people don't work quite as much then. I've

RE: [openssl.org #676] Small OpenSSL

Thanks! Got it. Regards, David Ahrens -Original Message- From: Bill Pringlemeir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ahrens, David (David) Subject: Re: [openssl.org #676] Small OpenSSL David == Ahrens, David (David) [EMAIL