[openssl.org #970] build error 0.9.7e

2004-11-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT
Hi, I tried to compile openssl-0.9.7e as usual, however since version e it fails with: .. + gcc -shared -o libfips.so.0.9.7 -Wl,-soname=libfips.so.0.9.7 -Wl,-Bsymbolic -Wl,--whole-archive libfips.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -L. -L/export/scratch/build/root4build/usr/lib -ldl -lc gcc: libfips.a:

Re: [openssl.org #970] build error 0.9.7e

2004-11-09 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:32:46 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt I tried to compile openssl-0.9.7e as usual, however since version e rt it fails with: rt rt .. rt + gcc -shared -o libfips.so.0.9.7 -Wl,-soname=libfips.so.0.9.7

Re: [openssl.org #970] build error 0.9.7e

2004-11-09 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:32:46 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt I tried to compile openssl-0.9.7e as usual, however since version e rt it fails with: rt rt .. rt + gcc -shared -o libfips.so.0.9.7 -Wl,-soname=libfips.so.0.9.7

Re: Generalized infrastructure for public key algorithms

2004-11-09 Thread Nils Larsch
Victor B. Wagner wrote: ... 2. To implement a lookup table for asymmetric algorithms When EVP_PKEY structure is created, the following parameters should be determined from the algorithm identifier: a) A type of algorithm specific structure which should be used for holding algorithm specific

Re: Generalized infrastructure for public key algorithms

2004-11-09 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004, Victor B. Wagner wrote: On 2004.11.07 at 17:55:56 +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: What do you mean under multiple implementations of same algorithm Its #2 I'm referring to: 2. There are two independent eigines which implements same algorithm with same OID.

Re: Generalized infrastructure for public key algorithms

2004-11-09 Thread Victor B. Wagner
On 2004.11.09 at 12:36:56 +0100, Nils Larsch wrote: b) A method which should be stored in the method field of DSA or RSA structure. There are additional problems concerning the ec_key_st structure which doesn't contain the method field and which is the same for two algorithm types -

other news about old irix 4.0

2004-11-09 Thread Riccardo Mottola
Hello, sorry if I repost this, I had no reply. But I was away for almost a week and maybe I missed something in the maze of spam that hit me. ALso I was away from my computer and couldn't compile anything new To make a point: R. Levitte sent me a patch to ease some function prototypes in

Re: RC4 optimized for AMD64 (+130% speedup)

2004-11-09 Thread Andy Polyakov
Folks! Are there people with EM64T P4 in their disposal on the list? I have published a paper about optimizing RC4 for AMD64. A working implementation, designed to be easily integrated into OpenSSL, is also provided: http://epita.fr/~bevand_m/papers/rc4-amd64.html

Re: RC4 optimized for AMD64 (+130% speedup)

2004-11-09 Thread Marc Bevand
Andy Polyakov wrote: | It should be noted though that I used gcc 3.3.x, while you're using | 3.4.x. Can it make such big difference? Yes, gcc 3.4 produces much better code than 3.3 when optimizing with -march=opteron. I have seen speedups of up to +40% in some benchmarks by just recompiling with

Re: [openssl.org #970] build error 0.9.7e

2004-11-09 Thread Jens Elkner via RT
'Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:' In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:32:46 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt I tried to compile openssl-0.9.7e as usual, however since version e rt it fails with: rt rt .. rt + gcc -shared

Re: [openssl.org #970] build error 0.9.7e

2004-11-09 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 10 Nov 2004 01:51:46 +0100 (MET), Jens Elkner via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: rt 'Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:' rt rt rt In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:32:46 +0100 (MET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED]