Hi,
I tried to compile openssl-0.9.7e as usual, however since version e
it fails with:
..
+ gcc -shared -o libfips.so.0.9.7 -Wl,-soname=libfips.so.0.9.7 -Wl,-Bsymbolic
-Wl,--whole-archive libfips.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -L.
-L/export/scratch/build/root4build/usr/lib -ldl -lc
gcc: libfips.a:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:32:46 +0100 (MET),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I tried to compile openssl-0.9.7e as usual, however since version e
rt it fails with:
rt
rt ..
rt + gcc -shared -o libfips.so.0.9.7 -Wl,-soname=libfips.so.0.9.7
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:32:46 +0100 (MET),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I tried to compile openssl-0.9.7e as usual, however since version e
rt it fails with:
rt
rt ..
rt + gcc -shared -o libfips.so.0.9.7 -Wl,-soname=libfips.so.0.9.7
Victor B. Wagner wrote:
...
2. To implement a lookup table for asymmetric algorithms
When EVP_PKEY structure is created, the following parameters should be
determined from the algorithm identifier:
a) A type of algorithm specific structure which should be used for
holding algorithm specific
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004, Victor B. Wagner wrote:
On 2004.11.07 at 17:55:56 +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
What do you mean under multiple implementations of same algorithm
Its #2 I'm referring to:
2. There are two independent eigines which implements same algorithm
with same OID.
On 2004.11.09 at 12:36:56 +0100, Nils Larsch wrote:
b) A method which should be stored in the method field of DSA or RSA
structure. There are additional problems concerning the ec_key_st
structure which doesn't contain the method field and which is the same
for two algorithm types -
Hello,
sorry if I repost this, I had no reply. But I was away for almost a week
and maybe I missed something in the maze of spam that hit me. ALso I was
away from my computer and couldn't compile anything new
To make a point:
R. Levitte sent me a patch to ease some function prototypes in
Folks! Are there people with EM64T P4 in their disposal on the list?
I have published a paper about optimizing RC4 for AMD64. A working
implementation, designed to be easily integrated into OpenSSL, is
also provided:
http://epita.fr/~bevand_m/papers/rc4-amd64.html
Andy Polyakov wrote:
| It should be noted though that I used gcc 3.3.x, while you're using
| 3.4.x. Can it make such big difference?
Yes, gcc 3.4 produces much better code than 3.3 when optimizing with
-march=opteron. I have seen speedups of up to +40% in some benchmarks
by just recompiling with
'Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:'
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:32:46 +0100 (MET),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt I tried to compile openssl-0.9.7e as usual, however since version e
rt it fails with:
rt
rt ..
rt + gcc -shared
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 10 Nov 2004 01:51:46 +0100 (MET), Jens
Elkner via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
rt 'Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote:'
rt
rt
rt In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, 9 Nov 2004 09:32:46 +0100 (MET),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11 matches
Mail list logo