It looks like (at least) the 1.0.0 branch requires a compiler that
can handle the long long (or some 64bit) data type. The native
compiler on SCO OpenServer 5 (sco5-cc target) does not support long long.
I first noticed this in crypto/whrlpool/wp_block, then
engines/ccgost/gosthash.h. There may be
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Brad House wrote:
[snip]
> That said, you're right -DSOCKLEN_T=int would work because of the
> #elif !defined(SOCKLEN_T), so I propose just patching Configure then
> (as attached), so someone doesn't have to know to manually pass that
> on the command line.
>
> -Brad
>
> P.S
Tim Rice wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Brad House wrote:
I've attached a trivial patch to correct the build of OpenSSL
on SCO OpenServer 5. SCO 5 doesn't define socklen_t, this
patch works around that.
---
diff -ruN openssl-1.0.0-beta2.orig/crypto/bio/b_sock.c
openssl-1.0.0-beta2/crypto/b
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Brad House wrote:
> I've attached a trivial patch to correct the build of OpenSSL
> on SCO OpenServer 5. SCO 5 doesn't define socklen_t, this
> patch works around that.
---
diff -ruN openssl-1.0.0-beta2.orig/crypto/bio/b_sock.c
openssl-1.0.0-beta2/crypto/bio/b_sock.c
--
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009, Brad House wrote:
First, an overview...
Solaris 9, gcc 4.1.2, binutils 2.18, gnu make 3.80, fails while
assembling aes-sparcv9.s ... A similar system, with the same version of gcc,
binutils, and gnu make, but running Solaris 8 does _not_ exhibit
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009, Brad House wrote:
> First, an overview...
>
> Solaris 9, gcc 4.1.2, binutils 2.18, gnu make 3.80, fails while
> assembling aes-sparcv9.s ... A similar system, with the same version of gcc,
> binutils, and gnu make, but running Solaris 8 does _not_ exhibit
> this behavior. B
First, an overview...
Solaris 9, gcc 4.1.2, binutils 2.18, gnu make 3.80, fails while
assembling aes-sparcv9.s ... A similar system, with the same version of gcc,
binutils, and gnu make, but running Solaris 8 does _not_ exhibit
this behavior. Both systems are sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraAX-i2.
Looking
Thank you. And sorry. I will follow the openssl-usr thread for such
questions...
-p
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
> This is an openssl-users question, and should not be on openssl-dev.
>
> "unable to get local issuer certificate" means that the CA root
> certificate has
This is an openssl-users question, and should not be on openssl-dev.
"unable to get local issuer certificate" means that the CA root
certificate has not been loaded.
The "local issuer certificate" is the local copy of the certifying
authority certificate which issued the certificate you're trying
I've attached a trivial patch to correct the build of OpenSSL
on SCO OpenServer 5. SCO 5 doesn't define socklen_t, this
patch works around that.
Here's some basic system info:
SCO OpenServer 5.0.6, gcc 3.3.1, gas 2.14, native linker, gnu make 3.81:
OpenSSL 1.0.0-beta2 21 Apr 2009
built on: Wed A
I think it was asked that we report successful builds as well as
failures. Here's my list of successful builds so far. I do have
some failures, but I'll provide those in another e-mail after I
figure out some work-arounds or patches.
--
Linux (Gentoo) i386 glibc 2.3, gcc 3.4.6, binutils 2.18, gn
Hi,
I didn't see the line about having everything if I compile from scratch.
Thank you.
Am I correct in assuming that I use that option -DHAVE_OPENSSL to
compile apache? I already have --enable-ssl --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl
in my configure line.
Thank you
Sincerely,
Christine Ross
HCCS - Ex
> [openssl-...@openssl.org - Wed Apr 22 18:16:24 2009]:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I just tried building OpenSSL 1.0.0 on OS/2 using GCC 4.3.3
>
> A couple of patches required - to configure and rand_os2.c
>
> Current patch hacks makefile.shared - I need some suggestions here to
> handle the fact that wi
Selon Christine Ross :
> Hi,
>
> I didn't see the line about having everything if I compile from scratch.
> Thank you.
>
> Am I correct in assuming that I use that option -DHAVE_OPENSSL to
> compile apache? I already have --enable-ssl --with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl
> in my configure line.
>
I don't kn
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009, The Doctor wrote:
> Now we are on to Beta 2 , Great News.
>
> When should expecting:
>
> BetaX
> RCX
> and
> the
> release?
>
No, just BetaX (for some value of X) then release.
> Also what errors or issues are we looking for in this beta?
>
The usual. Compilation erro
Selon Christine Ross :
> Hi and thank you,
>
> I'm trying the "make" on its own. The configure given me an error but I
> believe it was with the make.
>
You should use gmake on solaris, no?
Gilles
__
OpenSSL Project
Hi and thank you,
I'm trying the "make" on its own. The configure given me an error but I
believe it was with the make.
Sincerely,
Christine Ross
HCCS - Experts in Healthcare Learning
(516)478-4100, x108
cr...@hccs.com
HCCS is the leading provider of effective online training courses and
l
Hi All,
I just tried building OpenSSL 1.0.0 on OS/2 using GCC 4.3.3
A couple of patches required - to configure and rand_os2.c
Current patch hacks makefile.shared - I need some suggestions here to
handle the fact that with the two lines referencing LIBPATH included -
I get an error about LIBPAT
Hello,
I will try, thank you. If I compiled and installed openssl from source,
does that mean I have all the header files included, like the one
referenced in the error? Is there another source that includes the
headers? I do not have that file on the system (Solaris 8).
Sincerely,
Christin
Can someone send me the patch or the download link for this extension?
Thank you!
Marius
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/TLS-hello-extensions-and-supplemental-data-patch-tp23174619p23174619.html
Sent from the OpenSSL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Now we are on to Beta 2 , Great News.
When should expecting:
BetaX
RCX
and
the
release?
Also what errors or issues are we looking for in this beta?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
Never Satan
Selon Christine Ross :
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I'm trying to install apache2-compatible mod_dav and my compile said I
> needed
>
>
>
> checking for sslc.h... no
>
that's not an openssl file.
> no SSL-C headers found
>
> configure: error: ...No recognized SSL/TLS toolkit detected
>
>
>
> I compiled v0.9.8g
22 matches
Mail list logo
