Re: [openssl.org #1391] OpenSSL 0.9.8c build fails on old Linux

2008-09-17 Thread Alain Guibert via RT
Hello gentlemen,

 On Sunday, September 17, 2006 at 0:04:24 +0200, Alain Guibert wrote:

 during OpenSSL 0.9.8c build, make fails:
| bss_dgram.c: In function `dgram_ctrl':
| bss_dgram.c:345: `SO_RCVTIMEO' undeclared (first use this function)
| bss_dgram.c:355: `SO_SNDTIMEO' undeclared (first use this function)

This is now nicely fixed in the OpenSSL 0.9.8i release. You can close
this ticket. Much thanks to all the team!


Alain.


__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [openssl.org #1667] 0.9.8-stable sha512 segfaults

2008-04-24 Thread Alain Guibert via RT
Hello Andy, and thank you for your reply.

 On Tuesday, April 22, 2008 at 16:05:44 +0200, Andy Polyakov wrote:

 Could you collect disassembler output for offending code? I.e. run
 'gdb test/sha512t core' (or rather util/shlib_wrap.sh gdb test/sha512t
 as you have build for shared), run 'where', note address, run
 'disassemble' and advance to just noted address. Submit *complete*
 disassemble output from function start to offending instruction.

Thank you for the step-by-step procedure, as I'm not familiar at all
with gdb nor assembler. Disassembly of sha512_block_data_order() rebuilt
non-shared -O3 comes attached as sha512_block_data_order.asm.gz.


 Drop optimization level...

-O3 and -O2 segfault. -O1 and -O0 do work and test passes.


 Test attached patch.

| $ test/sha512t
| Testing SHA-512 ... passed.
| Testing SHA-384 ... passed.

Excellent! Your patch works at any optimization level. Much thanks to
you, Andy.


Alain.



sha512_block_data_order.asm.gz
Description: application/gunzip


[openssl.org #1667] 0.9.8-stable sha512 segfaults

2008-04-22 Thread Alain Guibert via RT
Hello,

During make test of latest CVS revision OpenSSL_0_9_8-stable, the
sha512 test fails on a segmentation fault in sha512_block_data_order():

| ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./sha512t
| make[1]: *** [test_sha] Segmentation fault (core dumped)
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.8-cvs/test'
| make: *** [tests] Error 2

Note OpenSSL release 0.9.8g works OK. Output of make report comes
attached as testlog.gz


Alain.



testlog.gz
Description: application/gunzip


Re: [openssl.org #1452] OpenSSL 0.9.7l make install syntax error

2007-10-17 Thread Alain Guibert via RT
Hello Andy,

 On Saturday, October 13, 2007 at 13:13:22 +0200, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:

 this was eventually fixed. thanks for report. a.

This syntax error problem is still present in latest 0.9.7m release, but
is indeed fixed in the CVS 0.9.7 branch. And it never impacted the 0.9.8
branch nor HEAD. Much thanks to you!


Alain.


__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [openssl.org #1392] OpenSSL 0.9.7k build fails missing poll.h

2007-02-02 Thread Alain Guibert via RT
Hello,

 On Sunday, September 17, 2006 at 0:04:48 +0200, Alain Guibert via RT wrote:

| rand_unix.c:128: poll.h: No such file or directory

This problem touches OpenSSL 0.9.7[kl], 0.9.8[cd], and latest CVS HEAD.
Here poll.h doesn't exist, but there is a sys/poll.h. And once
rand_unix.c modified to use it, OpenSSL builds properly.


Alain.


__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [openssl.org #1301] OpenSSL 0.9.7i shared build fails

2007-01-29 Thread Alain Guibert via RT

Hello,

 On Friday, March 31, 2006 at 14:00:13 +0200, Alain Guibert via RT wrote:

 On my old Linux box (Intel Debian bo: kernel 2.0.40, gcc 2.7.2.1,
 libc 5.4.33) during OpenSSL 0.9.7i shared lib build, make fails:
| [...snip hundreds of undefined references...]

This problem touches all versions since 0.9.7h until latest CVS HEAD.
Previous versions until 0.9.7g built correct shared libs. The difference
between g and h is that in Makefile.org a -lc option was removed
from shared build commands. For some reason I don't understand, only
when building OpenSSL, my linker doesn't seem to catch the libc without
an explicit -lc. Hence the tons of undefined refs.

I added -lc to either the EX_LIBS or SHARED_LDFLAGS fields in the
Configure table for linux-elf, and the errors are gone: Shared OpenSSL
(all versions) now build OK on this old system.


Alain.

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [openssl.org #1048] OpenSSL 0.9.7g failing make test

2007-01-24 Thread Alain Guibert via RT

Hello,

 On Wednesday, April 20, 2005 at 18:49:53 +0200, Alain Guibert wrote:

 during OpenSSL 0.9.7g build, make test fails:
| ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./destest
| ./destest: can't load library '../util/../libcrypto.so.0.9.7 
../util/../libssl.so.0.9.7'

These symptoms are the same with all OpenSSL versions since 0.9.7g,
including all 0.9.8*, and latest CVS HEAD, for shared builds. The
problem seems to be in util/shlib_wrap.sh, where LD_PRELOAD is set to
both the just built libcrypto and libssl, separated by a space (for
all platforms except BSD):

|   case $SYSNAME in
|   *BSD)   LD_PRELOAD=$LIBCRYPTOSO:$LIBSSLSO ;;  # *BSD
|   *)  LD_PRELOAD=$LIBCRYPTOSO $LIBSSLSO ;;  # SunOS, Linux, ELF 
HP-UX
|   esac

However for some reason my old Linux system doesn't allow space as
separator in LD_PRELOAD. It wants a colon, just like BSD. And then
make test of a shared OpenSSL becomes succesfull.

I suppose ld.so is responsible for this LD_PRELOAD space or colon
behaviour: Here it's version 1.8.10.


Alain.

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[openssl.org #1452] OpenSSL 0.9.7l make install syntax error

2006-12-29 Thread Alain Guibert via RT

Hello,

When doing make install in OpenSSL 0.9.7l, there is a syntax error,
some apps are not installed, but Makefile still continues:

| # make install
| [...]
| installing apps...
| make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7l/apps'
| /bin/sh: -c: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `;'
| /bin/sh: -c: line 1: `for i in openssl;  do   (echo installing $i;  cp $i 
/usr/local/bin/$i.new;  chmod 755 /usr/local/bin/$i.new;  mv -f  
/usr/local/bin/$i.new  /usr/local/bin/$i;  ) done;'
| make[1]: *** [install] Error 2
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7l/apps'
| installing test...
| make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7l/test'
| make[1]: Nothing to be done for `install'.
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7l/test'
| installing tools...
| make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7l/tools'
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7l/tools'
| installing libcrypto.a
| installing libssl.a
| cp openssl.pc /tmp/ossl/lib/pkgconfig
| chmod 644 /tmp/ossl/lib/pkgconfig/openssl.pc


Syntax error seems to be a misplaced semicolon in shell syntax inside
apps/Makefile. Schematically the bad:

| for i in list; do (commands) done;

Instead of the correct:

| for i in list; do (commands); done

The attached patch fixes that. Problem seen in 0.9.7[hijkl], absent in
0.9.7g and before. Problem absent in 0.9.8*, but there is still a
useless semicolon after the done.


Alain.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[openssl.org #1391] OpenSSL 0.9.8c build fails on old Linux

2006-09-16 Thread Alain Guibert via RT

Hello,

On my old Linux box (Intel Pentium 200 MMX, Debian bo, kernel 2.0.40,
gcc 2.7.2.1, libc 5.4.33) during OpenSSL 0.9.8c build, make fails:

| $ ./config no-sse2 no-hw; make
| [...]
| gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN 
-DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall 
-DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_PART_WORDS -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -DAES_ASM   -c 
bss_dgram.c -o bss_dgram.o
| bss_dgram.c: In function `dgram_ctrl':
| bss_dgram.c:345: `SO_RCVTIMEO' undeclared (first use this function)
| bss_dgram.c:345: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
| bss_dgram.c:345: for each function it appears in.)
| bss_dgram.c:355: `SO_SNDTIMEO' undeclared (first use this function)
| make[2]: *** [bss_dgram.o] Error 1
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.8c/crypto/bio'
| make[1]: *** [subdirs] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.8c/crypto'
| make: *** [build_crypto] Error 1


Alain.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[openssl.org #1392] OpenSSL 0.9.7k build fails missing poll.h

2006-09-16 Thread Alain Guibert via RT

On my old Linux box (Intel Pentium 200 MMX, Debian bo, kernel 2.0.40,
gcc 2.7.2.1, libc 5.4.33) during OpenSSL 0.9.7k build, make fails:

| $ ./config; make
| gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN 
-DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
-m486 -Wall -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM   -c rand_unix.c -o rand_unix.o
| rand_unix.c:128: poll.h: No such file or directory
| make[2]: *** [rand_unix.o] Error 1
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7k/crypto/rand'
| make[1]: *** [subdirs] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7k/crypto'
| make: *** [sub_all] Error 1


Alain.

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[openssl.org #1303] OpenSSL 0.9.8a build fails

2006-04-02 Thread Alain Guibert via RT

Hello,

On my old Linux box (Intel Pentium 200 MMX, Debian bo, kernel 2.0.40,
gcc 2.7.2.1, libc 5.4.33) during OpenSSL 0.9.8a build, make fails:

| $ ./config; make
| [...]
| gcc -I. -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN 
-DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall 
-DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_PART_WORDS -DOPENSSL_IA32_SSE2 -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM 
-DRMD160_ASM -DAES_ASM -c  -o x86cpuid-elf.o x86cpuid-elf.s
| x86cpuid-elf.s: Assembler messages:
| x86cpuid-elf.s:144: Error: bad register name ('%xmm0')
| x86cpuid-elf.s:145: Error: bad register name ('%xmm1')
| x86cpuid-elf.s:146: Error: bad register name ('%xmm2')
| x86cpuid-elf.s:147: Error: bad register name ('%xmm3')
| x86cpuid-elf.s:148: Error: bad register name ('%xmm4')
| x86cpuid-elf.s:149: Error: bad register name ('%xmm5')
| x86cpuid-elf.s:150: Error: bad register name ('%xmm6')
| x86cpuid-elf.s:151: Error: bad register name ('%xmm7')
| make[1]: *** [x86cpuid-elf.o] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.8a/crypto'
| make: *** [build_crypto] Error 1

Output of make report comes attached as testlog1.gz. Then I tried with
no-sse2 option, also failing later:

| $ ./config no-sse2; make
| [...]
| gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../../include -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN 
-DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall 
-DOPENSSL_BN_ASM_PART_WORDS -DSHA1_ASM -DMD5_ASM -DRMD160_ASM -DAES_ASM   -c 
eng_padlock.c -o eng_padlock.o
| eng_padlock.c: In function `padlock_available':
| eng_padlock.c:346: output operand constraint contains `+'
| eng_padlock.c:353: output operand constraint contains `+'
| eng_padlock.c:360: output operand constraint contains `+'
| eng_padlock.c: In function `padlock_bswapl':
| eng_padlock.c:378: output operand constraint contains `+'
| eng_padlock.c: In function `padlock_verify_context':
| eng_padlock.c:417: output operand constraint contains `+'
| make[2]: *** [eng_padlock.o] Error 1
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.8a/crypto/engine'
| make[1]: *** [subdirs] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.8a/crypto'
| make: *** [build_crypto] Error 1

Output of make report comes attached as testlog.no-sse2.gz


While at it: The file INSTALL says that zlib-dynamic is the default
choice, but I seem to get no-zlib-dynamic by default.


Alain.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[openssl.org #1301] OpenSSL 0.9.7i shared build fails

2006-03-31 Thread Alain Guibert via RT

Hello,

On my old Linux box (Intel Debian bo: kernel 2.0.40, gcc 2.7.2.1,
libc 5.4.33) during OpenSSL 0.9.7i shared lib build, make fails:

| $ ./config shared ; make
| [...snip hundreds of undefined references...]
| ./libcrypto.a(ui_openssl.o): In function `close_console':
| ui_openssl.o(.text+0x5a5): undefined reference to `_IO_stdin_'
| ui_openssl.o(.text+0x5ad): undefined reference to `fclose'
| ui_openssl.o(.text+0x5bc): undefined reference to `_IO_stderr_'
| ui_openssl.o(.text+0x5c4): undefined reference to `fclose'
| ./libcrypto.a(ui_openssl.o): In function `pushsig':
| ui_openssl.o(.text+0x60c): undefined reference to `memset'
| ui_openssl.o(.text+0x646): undefined reference to `sigaction'
| ui_openssl.o(.text+0x65b): undefined reference to `signal'
| ./libcrypto.a(ui_openssl.o): In function `popsig':
| ui_openssl.o(.text+0x6a2): undefined reference to `sigaction'
| make[3]: *** [do_gnu-shared] Error 1
| make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7i'
| make[2]: *** [libssl.so.0.9.7] Error 2
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7i'
| make[1]: *** [shared] Error 2
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7i/ssl'
| make: *** [sub_all] Error 1

Output of make report comes attached. Note non-shared build succeeds
and make test then passes OK.


BTW: How to change reporter's email address of old reports on Request
Tracker? I want to change reporter of #201 and #1048 to my present
email, but failed.


Alain.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


[openssl.org #1048] OpenSSL 0.9.7g failing make test

2005-04-20 Thread Alain Guibert via RT

Hello,

On my old Linux box (Intel Debian bo: kernel 2.0.40, gcc 2.7.2.1,
libc 5.4.33) during OpenSSL 0.9.7g build, make test fails:

| Doing certs
| /tmp/openssl-0.9.7g/util/../apps/openssl: can't load library 
'/tmp/openssl-0.9.7g/util/../libcrypto.so.0.9.7 
/tmp/openssl-0.9.7g/util/../libssl.so.0.9.7'
| eng1.pem = .0
| /tmp/openssl-0.9.7g/util/../apps/openssl: can't load library 
'/tmp/openssl-0.9.7g/util/../libcrypto.so.0.9.7 
/tmp/openssl-0.9.7g/util/../libssl.so.0.9.7'
| WARNING: Skipping duplicate certificate eng2.pem
| /tmp/openssl-0.9.7g/util/../apps/openssl: can't load library 
'/tmp/openssl-0.9.7g/util/../libcrypto.so.0.9.7 
/tmp/openssl-0.9.7g/util/../libssl.so.0.9.7'
| WARNING: Skipping duplicate certificate eng3.pem
[...snip...]
| touch rehash.time
| testing...
| make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7g/test'
| make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7g'
| making all in apps...
| make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7g/apps'
| make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'.
| make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7g/apps'
| make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7g'
| ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./destest
| ./destest: can't load library '../util/../libcrypto.so.0.9.7 
../util/../libssl.so.0.9.7'
| make[1]: *** [test_des] Error 15
| make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/openssl-0.9.7g/test'
| make: *** [tests] Error 2


No problem with 0.9.7e. Output of make report comes attached.


Alain.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: [openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test

2002-12-08 Thread Alain Guibert via RT

 On Monday, December 2, 2002 at 10:55:26 AM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote:

 Tried OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta4 and it seems to work. Both make test and
 make install passes. Great! Thanks. I'll confirm with 0.9.7 when it's
 released, but please feel free to close the bug.

Confirmation for the just released 0.9.6h (not engine): Everything
is OK, test and install pass. Thanks again! :-)


Side note: I sent on 1 Dec 2002 at 21:42:47 a mail (uninteresting:
basically a question I answered myself in next mail) that got lost. Not
received back from Request Tracker, no delivery bounce, and not reached
URL:http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/rt2/Ticket/Display.html?id=201. It
was id [EMAIL PROTECTED].


Bye!Alain.

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test

2002-12-02 Thread Alain Guibert via RT

Hello again Lutz,

 On Friday, November 29, 2002 at 1:20:25 PM +0100, Lutz Jänicke via RT wrote:

 On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:59:29PM +0100, Alain Guibert via RT wrote:
  - with 0.9.6g:
 installing man3/SSL_write.3
 /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in SSL_write.pod
 make: *** [install_docs] Error 29
 Hmm. Seems your version of pod2man has some problems, that were not
 detected. util/pod2mantest has been improved since the release of
 0.9.6g. The version of pod2man.pl shipping with OpenSSL should
 definitely work.

Tried OpenSSL 0.9.7 beta4 and it seems to work. Both make test and
make install passes. Great! Thanks. I'll confirm with 0.9.7 when it's
released, but please feel free to close the bug.


Installing manpages gives:

| /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in pod2mantest.pod
| pod2man does not work properly ('BasicTest' failed).  Looking for another pod2man ...
| /usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in pod2mantest.pod
| /usr/bin/pod2man does not work properly ('BasicTest' failed).  Looking for another 
|pod2man ...
| No working pod2man found.  Consider installing a new version.
| As a workaround, we'll use a bundled old copy of pod2man.pl.
| installing man1/CA.pl.1
| installing man1/asn1parse.1
[and so on]


There is just an alert at some point:

| installing man3/engine.3
| ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 34 of engine.pod: 
|head3
| ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 39 of engine.pod: 
|head3
| ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 59 of engine.pod: 
|head3
| ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 62 of engine.pod: 
|head3
| ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 69 of engine.pod: 
|head3
| ../../util/pod2man.pl: Unrecognized pod directive in paragraph 73 of engine.pod: 
|head3

But the installation continues, and man engine is there after.


Bye!Alain.

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test

2002-11-29 Thread Alain Guibert via RT

Hello Lutz,

 On Thursday, November 28, 2002 at 8:37:36 PM +0100, Lutz Jaenicke via RT wrote:

 [jaenicke - Fri Nov 15 22:52:05 2002]:
 The test_req script actually performs a
 ../apps/openssl req -config ../apps/openssl.cnf testreq.pem \
 -inform p -outform d f.d
 Can you run this manually?

It fails with unknown option testreq.pem message. But if I replace
argument testreq.pem by an input redirection  testreq.pem it
succeeds with a 326 bytes binary output f.d file. It succeeds today, but
was perhaps failing before: Situation has changed.


 Any updates?

Well, I'm sorry, don't know why: make test works now. With all
versions previously failing: 0.9.6d, e and g. And the exact same build
commands as before. So it obviously was something broken on my system...
The only important change I made was cleanly installing a working 0.9.6c
some weeks ago. Appart of that, I didn't add nor upgrade anything in
build tools (gcc, make and friends), nor any system libraries (well no:
I upgraded libiconv 1.8, Ncurses 5.3, and libbz2 1.0.2).

Note that with this install of 0.9.6c I successfully experimented
playing with CA.pl to create a CA then a server certificate. This was
failing before, with test failing 0.9.6d, with errors I didn't note (I
thought I'd make later a complete report but lacked time), unless I
removed nearly everything from openssl.cnf as nsComment,
subjectKeyIdentifier, authorityKeyIdentifier, basicConstraints,
keyUsage, etc... From my poor memory, errors were something as unknown
object type. Today it's working, with test succeeding 0.9.6d.

I wanted to test with 0.9.6e/g, but if they now pass make and
make test, they fail make install (?!?) while installing manpages:

 - with 0.9.6e:

[snip many same errors]
installing man1/verify.1
/usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in pod2mantest.pod
/usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in verify.pod
installing man1/version.1
/usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in pod2mantest.pod
/usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in version.pod
installing man1/x509.1
/usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in pod2mantest.pod
/usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in x509.pod
make: *** [install_docs] Error 29

 - with 0.9.6g:

[snip many same errors]
installing man3/SSL_state_string.3
/usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in SSL_state_string.pod
installing man3/SSL_want.3
/usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in SSL_want.pod
installing man3/SSL_write.3
/usr/bin/pod2man: Invalid man page - 1st pod line is not NAME in SSL_write.pod
make: *** [install_docs] Error 29


In both cases, I end without openssl installed.


Summary:

 - 0.9.6c always tested and installed OK.
 - before 0.9.6d/e/g tested BAD.
 - now 0.9.6d tests and installs OK.
 - now 0.9.6e/g test OK but install BAD.

So I now upgraded my system to 0.9.6d, the latest working version.


Hope this makes sense... Thanks again, bye! Alain.

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [openssl.org #201] OpenSSL 0.9.6e failing make test

2002-08-15 Thread Alain Guibert via RT


Hello Richard,

 On Thursday, August 15, 2002 at 12:36:52 PM +0200,
 Richard Levitte via RT wrote:

 On my old Linux box (Intel Debian bo: kernel 2.0.39, gcc 2.7.2.1,
 libc 5.4.33) during OpenSSL 0.9.6e build a test in make test fails:
| testing req conversions
| p - d
| make[1]: *** [test_req] Error 1
| make: *** [tests] Error 2
 The only thing I can think of is that your disk is full

Well no, don't think so: I have more than 80 Mo free on /tmp when I
start make test.


 or test/testreq.pem is corrupted in some way.

It's coming from a fresh tar.gz just uncompressed witout problems. BTW I
get the same error with 0.9.6g, but not with older 0.9.6c. So same error
with d, e, and g.


Alain.

__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager   [EMAIL PROTECTED]