. It will simplify the
build of OpenSSL on Win64 platform.
Thanks,
--
Matyas Majzik
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
/uplink.pl win64a uptable.asm
4. ml64 -c uptable.asm
5. modify the mak files as above
6. nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak
7. nmake -f ms\nt.mak
I used the new platform SDK with 64 bit compiler and MSVC++.
I hope it helps others out.
Thank you for your help,
--
Matyas Majzik
there is multiple uses of uplink.obj. That is the reason
- I think - why it worked for me without adding to SHLIB_EX_OBJ .
As I see uplink is automatically compiled and included by the make file
without need to be added to SHLIB_EX_OBJ.
Thanks for your time,
--
Matyas Majzik
error U1077: 'link' : return code '0x460'
Stop.
What is wrong?
Using static libraries are successful.
Thanks,
--
Matyas Majzik
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Hi!
I tested beta-1 further and I have the following problems using VC++ .NET
2003.
perl Configure VC-WIN32 enable-rc5 enable-mdc2
This configuration compiles cleanly and tests are passed succesfully.
perl Configure VC-WIN32 zlib perl Configure VC-WIN32 zlib enable-rc5
enable-mdc2
perl
I have few more questions:
Is there SSE2 support in win32 version with VC? Is it enough to add /G7
and /arch:SSE2 to the compiler options or I need to do anything else?
If you refer to assembler SSE2 code-pathes, then answer is no to both
questions. Didn't have energy to engage it there...
Too
http://www.openssl.org
19-may-2002:Beta 1 of OpenSSL 0.9.8 is now available, please test
it now
I think it should be 2005 :))
Matyas
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Hi!
I downloaded openssl-0.9.8-stable-SNAP-20050518.tar.gz. I get the following
warnings when compiling both dynamic or static libraries.
Compiler is Visual C++ .NET 2003.
cl /Fotmp32\ec.obj -DMONOLITH -Iinc32 -Itmp32 /MT /W3 /WX /G5 /Ox
/O2 /O
b2 /Gs0 /GF /Gy
/nologo
Or compile OpenSSL with /Mt by editing ms/nt.mak if you want to use static
librarys.
- Original Message -
From: Marcus Carey via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 7:22 AM
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #897] Bug Report -- PEM_read and PEM_write