Re: [openssl-dev] NonStop platform support
On January 9, 2018 10:10 AM, Richard Levitte wrote: > On Jan 2018 09:32:25 -0500, "Randall S. Becker" said: > > rsbecker> A request, maybe OT. The NonStop platform does broadly deploy > rsbecker> Apache but do use OpenSSL. I understand that OpenSSL does not > rsbecker> officially support the HPE NonStop NSE/NSX platforms - but it > rsbecker> is used on the platform through my team's port, which I > rsbecker> currently support, and through other ports as well. Added a > rsbecker> dependency to Apache is likely to dead-end the project for us > rsbecker> depending on the depth of the dependency, if I understand > rsbecker> where this is going (hoping I am wrong). > > I pulled this away from the Speck discussion as it is indeed OT. > > Does this involve some specific config target? In that case, you might be > interested in the effort in PR 5043: > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5043 > > (if you claim the use of and can verify the correctness of some specific config > target(s), they can be classified as community > supported) I am authorized to claim that the ITUGLIB team (including myself) can support this effort for the following config targets: NONSTOP_KERNEL:[HJ]*:*:NSE* # H- or J-Series, IA64 NONSTOP_KERNEL:L*:*:NSX*) # x86-64 Our current port is current with 1.0.2n with platform mods. I have posted such to the 5043 pull discussion and can create a pull request with our modifications for review. Regards, Randall -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] NonStop platform support
On January 9, 2018 10:10 AM, Richard Levitte wrote: > In message <002801d38956$aec22c30$0c468490$@nexbridge.com> on Tue, > 9 Jan 2018 09:32:25 -0500, "Randall S. Becker" > said: > > rsbecker> A request, maybe OT. The NonStop platform does broadly deploy > rsbecker> Apache but do use OpenSSL. I understand that OpenSSL does not > rsbecker> officially support the HPE NonStop NSE/NSX platforms - but it > rsbecker> is used on the platform through my team's port, which I > rsbecker> currently support, and through other ports as well. Added a > rsbecker> dependency to Apache is likely to dead-end the project for us > rsbecker> depending on the depth of the dependency, if I understand > rsbecker> where this is going (hoping I am wrong). > > I pulled this away from the Speck discussion as it is indeed OT. > > Does this involve some specific config target? In that case, you might be > interested in the effort in PR 5043: > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5043 > > (if you claim the use of and can verify the correctness of some specific config > target(s), they can be classified as community > supported) I'm going to bring this to my team, but expect a good outcome. The platforms we are supporting are (from config): NONSTOP_KERNEL:[HJ]*:*:NSE*) # H- or J-Series, IA64 NONSTOP_KERNEL:L*:*:NSX*) # x86-64 Cheers, Randall -- Brief whoami: NonStop&UNIX developer since approximately UNIX(421664400)/NonStop(2112884442) -- In my real life, I talk too much. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] Speck Cipher Integration with OpenSSL
On January 9, 2018 10:05 AM, Rich Salz wrote: > It would be interesting to see how many changes you need to support your > platform. Surprisingly not many at all. The platform has been significantly modernized since early ports. Most of the differences are the addition of a FLOSS layer (though #includes) and one byte swap issue on bn_mul_add_words that I'm not sure is relevant anymore. Some of the tracked files that generated (tests/Makefile) have spacing difference due to tooling differences. The code, however, is very close to vanilla as of 1.0.2n. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] Speck Cipher Integration with OpenSSL
On January 9, 2018 9:46 AM Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > To: openssl-dev@openssl.org; Randall S. Becker > On 01/09/2018 08:32 AM, Randall S. Becker wrote: > > On January 9, 2018 8:41 AM, Rich Salz > >> ➢ We are currently modifying the source from Apache to OpenSSL open > >> source > >> licensing for the Speck/OpenSSL integration. Related repositories such > >> as the cipher itself will remain under the Apache license. We would > >> love > >> input on the following items: > >> > >> Don’t bother changing the license. The future direction of OpenSSL > >> is moving to Apache, anda it’s unlikely this work would show up in > >> OpenSSL before we change the license. > >> > >> We’ll soon have a blog post about our current thoughts on a crypto policy. > >> Watch this space. > >> > >> For discussion, the future-compatible thing to do :) is open a GitHub > >> issue. > >> Then, make a pull request after the issue discussion seems to have > >> died down. > > A request, maybe OT. The NonStop platform does broadly deploy Apache > but do use OpenSSL. I understand that OpenSSL does not officially support > the HPE NonStop NSE/NSX platforms - but it is used on the platform through > my team's port, which I currently support, and through other ports as well. > Added a dependency to Apache is likely to dead-end the project for us > depending on the depth of the dependency, if I understand where this is > going (hoping I am wrong). > > > > Apache license, not Apache software. Thank you thank you thank you 😊, but sorry about adding noise to the conversation. Cheers, Randall -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] Speck Cipher Integration with OpenSSL
On January 9, 2018 8:41 AM, Rich Salz > ➢ We are currently modifying the source from Apache to OpenSSL open > source > licensing for the Speck/OpenSSL integration. Related repositories such > as the cipher itself will remain under the Apache license. We would love > input on the following items: > > Don’t bother changing the license. The future direction of OpenSSL is moving > to Apache, anda it’s unlikely this work would show up in OpenSSL before we > change the license. > > We’ll soon have a blog post about our current thoughts on a crypto policy. > Watch this space. > > For discussion, the future-compatible thing to do :) is open a GitHub issue. > Then, make a pull request after the issue discussion seems to have died > down. A request, maybe OT. The NonStop platform does broadly deploy Apache but do use OpenSSL. I understand that OpenSSL does not officially support the HPE NonStop NSE/NSX platforms - but it is used on the platform through my team's port, which I currently support, and through other ports as well. Added a dependency to Apache is likely to dead-end the project for us depending on the depth of the dependency, if I understand where this is going (hoping I am wrong). With respect, Randall -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] OpenSSL version 1.0.2n published
Thanks Matt. Glad it's no factor. The test otherwise completed with $?=0. Cheers, Randall -Original Message- From: openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Matt Caswell Sent: December 7, 2017 11:05 AM To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] OpenSSL version 1.0.2n published On 07/12/17 15:16, Randall S. Becker wrote: > For HPE NonStop J-Series: Builds passed. Previous version was 1.0.2m. > > New breakage: > ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./fatalerrtest ../apps/server.pem > ../apps/server.pem > SSL_accept() failed -1, 1 > 1827815872:error:140800FF:SSL routines:ssl3_accept:unknown state: > openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c:869: The 1.0.2 test framework is very noisy (its much better in 1.1.0). There are a whole bunch of tests that output "failures" and "errors" which are actually normal operation (because they are testing failure and error conditions). The above is normal output from a successful test. The important thing is if the overall "make test" process completes successfully or exits with an error. Matt > > -Original Message- > From: openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf > Of OpenSSL > Sent: December 7, 2017 8:56 AM > To: OpenSSL Developer ML ; OpenSSL User > Support ML ; OpenSSL Announce ML > > Subject: [openssl-dev] OpenSSL version 1.0.2n published > > >OpenSSL version 1.0.2n released >=== > >OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS >https://www.openssl.org/ > >The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of >version 1.0.2n of our open source toolkit for SSL/TLS. For details >of changes and known issues see the release notes at: > > https://www.openssl.org/news/openssl-1.0.2-notes.html > >OpenSSL 1.0.2n is available for download via HTTP and FTP from the >following master locations (you can find the various FTP mirrors under >https://www.openssl.org/source/mirror.html): > > * https://www.openssl.org/source/ > * ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/ > >The distribution file name is: > > o openssl-1.0.2n.tar.gz > Size: 5375802 > SHA1 checksum: 0ca2957869206de193603eca6d89f532f61680b1 > SHA256 checksum: > 370babb75f278c39e0c50e8c4e7493bc0f18db6867478341a832a982fd15a8fe > >The checksums were calculated using the following commands: > > openssl sha1 openssl-1.0.2n.tar.gz > openssl sha256 openssl-1.0.2n.tar.gz > >Yours, > >The OpenSSL Project Team. > > -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] OpenSSL version 1.0.2n published
I went back to our Jenkins test logs and found that this breakage was prior to 1.0.2n. Sorry for the confusion. I still need to track down why this is happening. Advice is appreciated on pursing this. Thanks, Randall -- Brief whoami: NonStop&UNIX developer since approximately UNIX(421664400)/NonStop(2112884442) -- In my real life, I talk too much. -Original Message- From: openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Randall S. Becker Sent: December 7, 2017 10:16 AM To: open...@openssl.org; openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] OpenSSL version 1.0.2n published For HPE NonStop J-Series: Builds passed. Previous version was 1.0.2m. New breakage: ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./fatalerrtest ../apps/server.pem ../apps/server.pem SSL_accept() failed -1, 1 1827815872:error:140800FF:SSL routines:ssl3_accept:unknown state: openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c:869: -Original Message- From: openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of OpenSSL Sent: December 7, 2017 8:56 AM To: OpenSSL Developer ML ; OpenSSL User Support ML ; OpenSSL Announce ML Subject: [openssl-dev] OpenSSL version 1.0.2n published -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 OpenSSL version 1.0.2n released === OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS https://www.openssl.org/ The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of version 1.0.2n of our open source toolkit for SSL/TLS. For details of changes and known issues see the release notes at: https://www.openssl.org/news/openssl-1.0.2-notes.html OpenSSL 1.0.2n is available for download via HTTP and FTP from the following master locations (you can find the various FTP mirrors under https://www.openssl.org/source/mirror.html): * https://www.openssl.org/source/ * ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/ The distribution file name is: o openssl-1.0.2n.tar.gz Size: 5375802 SHA1 checksum: 0ca2957869206de193603eca6d89f532f61680b1 SHA256 checksum: 370babb75f278c39e0c50e8c4e7493bc0f18db6867478341a832a982fd15a8fe The checksums were calculated using the following commands: openssl sha1 openssl-1.0.2n.tar.gz openssl sha256 openssl-1.0.2n.tar.gz Yours, The OpenSSL Project Team. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJaKT/tAAoJENnE0m0OYESR/JMH/jME2y7j63xd1JX1A41mgKiC y9ps1niQw6QVH50r2IR0bZc9EpM9WEF0zERjCPwvh/tCn2IS/40uGzdHps8aexV1 3p7F3oAyXfG3xPyY3p14zfRP+9YvatbVT28HVnhGmruUonS9p6H+4zQN4hd8LZQO tMZ5XtdmTbULdnlD6znBVECcUN2C+LQgaGZ5WCx8Wh8b7Wo3VT50+Jwv/VtmgLAf csQKJlD7qNQq9xZ+fMGAlWuAIeGPM4ck+bbvx2ZclVMJh98rPWMd9HniNWrtMkM4 y4z7cu7hLKlroFpgJKH9kWxlDDCSWE3pxb9RLidff1K3HFps5NDc41Rk8tYqcVU= =CjjY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] OpenSSL version 1.0.2n published
For HPE NonStop J-Series: Builds passed. Previous version was 1.0.2m. New breakage: ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./fatalerrtest ../apps/server.pem ../apps/server.pem SSL_accept() failed -1, 1 1827815872:error:140800FF:SSL routines:ssl3_accept:unknown state: openssl/ssl/s3_srvr.c:869: -Original Message- From: openssl-dev [mailto:openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of OpenSSL Sent: December 7, 2017 8:56 AM To: OpenSSL Developer ML ; OpenSSL User Support ML ; OpenSSL Announce ML Subject: [openssl-dev] OpenSSL version 1.0.2n published -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 OpenSSL version 1.0.2n released === OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS https://www.openssl.org/ The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of version 1.0.2n of our open source toolkit for SSL/TLS. For details of changes and known issues see the release notes at: https://www.openssl.org/news/openssl-1.0.2-notes.html OpenSSL 1.0.2n is available for download via HTTP and FTP from the following master locations (you can find the various FTP mirrors under https://www.openssl.org/source/mirror.html): * https://www.openssl.org/source/ * ftp://ftp.openssl.org/source/ The distribution file name is: o openssl-1.0.2n.tar.gz Size: 5375802 SHA1 checksum: 0ca2957869206de193603eca6d89f532f61680b1 SHA256 checksum: 370babb75f278c39e0c50e8c4e7493bc0f18db6867478341a832a982fd15a8fe The checksums were calculated using the following commands: openssl sha1 openssl-1.0.2n.tar.gz openssl sha256 openssl-1.0.2n.tar.gz Yours, The OpenSSL Project Team. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJaKT/tAAoJENnE0m0OYESR/JMH/jME2y7j63xd1JX1A41mgKiC y9ps1niQw6QVH50r2IR0bZc9EpM9WEF0zERjCPwvh/tCn2IS/40uGzdHps8aexV1 3p7F3oAyXfG3xPyY3p14zfRP+9YvatbVT28HVnhGmruUonS9p6H+4zQN4hd8LZQO tMZ5XtdmTbULdnlD6znBVECcUN2C+LQgaGZ5WCx8Wh8b7Wo3VT50+Jwv/VtmgLAf csQKJlD7qNQq9xZ+fMGAlWuAIeGPM4ck+bbvx2ZclVMJh98rPWMd9HniNWrtMkM4 y4z7cu7hLKlroFpgJKH9kWxlDDCSWE3pxb9RLidff1K3HFps5NDc41Rk8tYqcVU= =CjjY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4398] BUG / 1.0.2g breaks CURL extension
On March 8, 2016 9:37 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > To: r...@openssl.org; openssl-dev@openssl.org > Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4398] BUG / 1.0.2g breaks CURL > extension > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 01:43:48PM +, Thomas Brunnthaler via RT > wrote: > > > CURL not working since upgrade to 1.0.2g on windows. I use PHP 5.2.17 > VC6 > > x86 TS. Error Message: OS cannot load %1 or so. > > Is this fixed by: > > > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/133138569f37d149ed1d7641fe > 8c75a93fded445 We saw this on HPE NonStop NSE on all products using the OpenSSL DLL. Our solution was to reconfigure and rebuild OpenSSH, Curl, wget, git (to name a few). The configure scripts detect that those methods are not present and act appropriately. Cheers, Randall -- Brief whoami: NonStop&UNIX developer since approximately UNIX(421664400)/NonStop(2112884442) -- In my real life, I talk too much. -- Ticket here: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4398 Please log in as guest with password guest if prompted -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4398] BUG / 1.0.2g breaks CURL extension
On March 8, 2016 9:37 AM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > To: r...@openssl.org; openssl-dev@openssl.org > Subject: Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4398] BUG / 1.0.2g breaks CURL > extension > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 01:43:48PM +, Thomas Brunnthaler via RT > wrote: > > > CURL not working since upgrade to 1.0.2g on windows. I use PHP 5.2.17 > VC6 > > x86 TS. Error Message: OS cannot load %1 or so. > > Is this fixed by: > > > https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/133138569f37d149ed1d7641fe > 8c75a93fded445 We saw this on HPE NonStop NSE on all products using the OpenSSL DLL. Our solution was to reconfigure and rebuild OpenSSH, Curl, wget, git (to name a few). The configure scripts detect that those methods are not present and act appropriately. Cheers, Randall -- Brief whoami: NonStop&UNIX developer since approximately UNIX(421664400)/NonStop(2112884442) -- In my real life, I talk too much. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] Do you use EGD or PRNGD?
On June 1, 2015 10:03 AM Rich Salz wrote: > We are thinking of removing support for EGD (entropy-gathering daemon) in the next release. > None of our supported platforms have needed it for some time. If this will cause > an issue for you, please reply soon. While HP NonStop is not officially supported, I have been helping to maintain a fork for the platform since December and are current through 1.0.2a. We do use prngd. I am looking for ways to get back on the official platform list, looking for alternatives to prngd for that platform, and trying get vendor by-in in this area. ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] OpenSSL version 1.0.2a released
On March 19, 2015 1:58 PM Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015, Randall S. Becker wrote: > > On March 19, 2015 10:09 AM OpenSSL wrote: > > > To: OpenSSL Developer ML; OpenSSL User Support ML; OpenSSL Announce > > > ML > > > Subject: [openssl-dev] OpenSSL version 1.0.2a released > > >OpenSSL version 1.0.2a released > > >=== > > > > > >OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS > > >http://www.openssl.org/ > > > > > >The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of > > >version 1.0.2a of our open source toolkit for SSL/TLS. For details > > >of changes and known issues see the release notes at: > > > > Will there be a git tag on the official commit openssl 1.0.2a released > > commit? The openssl_1_0_2_stable branch is a moving target. Happily, > > the > > 1.0.1 versions all had tags. If not, would someone mind posting the > > official commit id from the github repo for this? > > > > All releases have tags. In this case it is OpenSSL_1_0_2a I've just checked and it > is on the git.openssl.org repo. If it hasn't shown up on github the commit ID is > 1cf0ad8601847cf40d > > Steve. Thanks. I will monitor for it. Neither the commit nor tag is not there yet. Regards, Randall ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] OpenSSL version 1.0.2a released
On March 19, 2015 10:09 AM OpenSSL wrote: > To: OpenSSL Developer ML; OpenSSL User Support ML; OpenSSL Announce ML > Subject: [openssl-dev] OpenSSL version 1.0.2a released >OpenSSL version 1.0.2a released >=== > >OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS >http://www.openssl.org/ > >The OpenSSL project team is pleased to announce the release of >version 1.0.2a of our open source toolkit for SSL/TLS. For details >of changes and known issues see the release notes at: Will there be a git tag on the official commit openssl 1.0.2a released commit? The openssl_1_0_2_stable branch is a moving target. Happily, the 1.0.1 versions all had tags. If not, would someone mind posting the official commit id from the github repo for this? Sincerely, Randall ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3735] [bug] Openssl transitive dependency to libexplain (minor)
> On March 7, 2015 9:04 PM Rich Salz via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org] wrote: > To: rsbec...@nexbridge.com > Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org > Subject: [openssl.org #3735] [bug] Openssl transitive dependency to libexplain > (minor) > > Thanks for bringing this up. It's an internal target used only by the openssl > team. We'll fix it if/when a system upgrade on our packaging system removes > it. > :) That's all I can ask, Rich. Thank you :) ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3735] [bug] Openssl transitive dependency to libexplain (minor)
> On March 7, 2015 9:04 PM Rich Salz via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org] wrote: > To: rsbec...@nexbridge.com > Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org > Subject: [openssl.org #3735] [bug] Openssl transitive dependency to libexplain > (minor) > > Thanks for bringing this up. It's an internal target used only by the openssl > team. We'll fix it if/when a system upgrade on our packaging system removes > it. > :) That's all I can ask, Rich. Thank you :) ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3735] [bug] Openssl transitive dependency to libexplain (minor)
>> On March 7, 2015 1:34 PM Richard Moore via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org] >> wrote: > On 7 March 2015 at 18:11, Randall S. Becker via RT wrote: > > > On March 7, 2015 1:02 PM Richard Moore via RT > > > [mailto:r...@openssl.org] > > wrote: > > >> On 7 March 2015 at 17:14, Randall S. Becker via RT > > wrote: > > >> > > > > Please forgive the potential red-herring nature of this minor > > > > report, however.. > > > > > > > > Openssl distribution depends on tardy, which in turn, depends on > > > > libexplain. > > > > According to > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765335, > > > > the libexplain maintainer has retired and the package is orphaned. > > > > This is potentially represents an issue as libexplain is highly > > embedded in > > > tardy. > > > > > > > > > > This sounds purely a packaging issue with debian and nothing to do > > > with openssl itself. > > > > Tardy is referenced in the openssl Makefile tar rule, which is there > > the dependency manifests. > > > > $(TAR) $(TARFLAGS) --files-from ../$(TARFILE).list -cvf - | \ > > tardy --user_number=0 --user_name=openssl \ > > --group_number=0 --group_name=openssl \ > > --prefix=openssl-$(VERSION) - |\ > > gzip --best >../$(TARFILE).gz; \ > > > > > Surely you build your packages from the release tar balls? That means that > this > rule is never used. We are building from git, as it is how we apply our platform patches. Support was recently dropped for Tandem/NonStop, so we have little choice here, other than hand-patching, which is not sustainable. Aside, I am just trying to bring an awareness to potential unsupported product dependency. Nothing more. ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3735] [bug] Openssl transitive dependency to libexplain (minor)
>> On March 7, 2015 1:34 PM Richard Moore via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org] >> wrote: > On 7 March 2015 at 18:11, Randall S. Becker via RT wrote: > > > On March 7, 2015 1:02 PM Richard Moore via RT > > > [mailto:r...@openssl.org] > > wrote: > > >> On 7 March 2015 at 17:14, Randall S. Becker via RT > > wrote: > > >> > > > > Please forgive the potential red-herring nature of this minor > > > > report, however.. > > > > > > > > Openssl distribution depends on tardy, which in turn, depends on > > > > libexplain. > > > > According to > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765335, > > > > the libexplain maintainer has retired and the package is orphaned. > > > > This is potentially represents an issue as libexplain is highly > > embedded in > > > tardy. > > > > > > > > > > This sounds purely a packaging issue with debian and nothing to do > > > with openssl itself. > > > > Tardy is referenced in the openssl Makefile tar rule, which is there > > the dependency manifests. > > > > $(TAR) $(TARFLAGS) --files-from ../$(TARFILE).list -cvf - | \ > > tardy --user_number=0 --user_name=openssl \ > > --group_number=0 --group_name=openssl \ > > --prefix=openssl-$(VERSION) - |\ > > gzip --best >../$(TARFILE).gz; \ > > > > > Surely you build your packages from the release tar balls? That means that > this > rule is never used. We are building from git, as it is how we apply our platform patches. Support was recently dropped for Tandem/NonStop, so we have little choice here, other than hand-patching, which is not sustainable. Aside, I am just trying to bring an awareness to potential unsupported product dependency. Nothing more. ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3735] [bug] Openssl transitive dependency to libexplain (minor)
> On March 7, 2015 1:02 PM Richard Moore via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org] wrote: >> On 7 March 2015 at 17:14, Randall S. Becker via RT wrote: >> > > Please forgive the potential red-herring nature of this minor report, > > however.. > > > > Openssl distribution depends on tardy, which in turn, depends on > > libexplain. > > According to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765335, > > the libexplain maintainer has retired and the package is orphaned. > > This is potentially represents an issue as libexplain is highly embedded in > tardy. > > > > This sounds purely a packaging issue with debian and nothing to do with > openssl itself. Tardy is referenced in the openssl Makefile tar rule, which is there the dependency manifests. $(TAR) $(TARFLAGS) --files-from ../$(TARFILE).list -cvf - | \ tardy --user_number=0 --user_name=openssl \ --group_number=0 --group_name=openssl \ --prefix=openssl-$(VERSION) - |\ gzip --best >../$(TARFILE).gz; \ ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3735] [bug] Openssl transitive dependency to libexplain (minor)
> On March 7, 2015 1:02 PM Richard Moore via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org] wrote: >> On 7 March 2015 at 17:14, Randall S. Becker via RT wrote: >> > > Please forgive the potential red-herring nature of this minor report, > > however.. > > > > Openssl distribution depends on tardy, which in turn, depends on > > libexplain. > > According to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765335, > > the libexplain maintainer has retired and the package is orphaned. > > This is potentially represents an issue as libexplain is highly embedded in > tardy. > > > > This sounds purely a packaging issue with debian and nothing to do with > openssl itself. Tardy is referenced in the openssl Makefile tar rule, which is there the dependency manifests. $(TAR) $(TARFLAGS) --files-from ../$(TARFILE).list -cvf - | \ tardy --user_number=0 --user_name=openssl \ --group_number=0 --group_name=openssl \ --prefix=openssl-$(VERSION) - |\ gzip --best >../$(TARFILE).gz; \ ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3735] [bug] Openssl transitive dependency to libexplain (minor)
Please forgive the potential red-herring nature of this minor report, however.. Openssl distribution depends on tardy, which in turn, depends on libexplain. According to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765335, the libexplain maintainer has retired and the package is orphaned. This is potentially represents an issue as libexplain is highly embedded in tardy. Sincerely, Randall -- Brief whoami: NonStop&UNIX developer since approximately UNIX(421664400)/NonStop(2112884442) -- In my real life, I talk too much. ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
