Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3843] OpenSSL 1.0.1* and below: incorrect use of _lrotl()

2015-05-24 Thread Solar Designer via RT
Hi Andy, Thank you for your reply! I am CC'ing Lei on mine. On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:55:10PM +0200, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote: For reference. icc was not cared for for quite some time. Initially it was possible for me, by then university employee, to use it, but then they changes terms

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3843] OpenSSL 1.0.1* and below: incorrect use of _lrotl()

2015-05-08 Thread Solar Designer via RT
Hi, Lei Zhang (re)discovered that OpenSSL 1.0.1* and below gets miscompiled, resulting in incorrect computation of at least SHA-1 hashes (and probably SHA-0, MD4, MD5) when it's compiled with icc for 64-bit Linux (x86_64 or mic), but not for Windows. The problem is already fixed in 1.0.2 and in

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-15 Thread Solar Designer via RT
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:05:13AM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT wrote: rt # DIRS= crypto ssl rsaref $(SHLIB_MARK) apps test tools rt # all: clean-shared Makefile.ssl sub_all rt make Makefile.ssl rt make sub_all DIRS=crypto ssl rsaref rt LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd` make sub_all

Re: [openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-11-14 Thread Solar Designer via RT
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 03:00:37PM +0100, Richard Levitte via RT wrote: [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun May 12 22:48:56 2002]: JFYI, when updating our package from 0.9.6c to 0.9.6d I've noticed that the new shared libcrypto library doesn't work anymore. The openssl(1) binary wouldn't

[openssl.org #29] -Wl,-Bsymbolic in 0.9.6d broke shared builds

2002-05-12 Thread Solar Designer via RT
JFYI, when updating our package from 0.9.6c to 0.9.6d I've noticed that the new shared libcrypto library doesn't work anymore. The openssl(1) binary wouldn't recognize any of the block ciphers. I tracked this down to the addition of -Wl,-Bsymbolic. Removing that option solved the problem for