Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker said:
time_t can be anything. It can be a nose-picking monster for all I
know. All that matters is that it should represent time in some way,
and be usefull in that way for any function that takes a time_t as an
argument. Under VMS (with DEC C), time_t is
]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows CE support for 0.9.7 (against 20021114
snapshot)
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 18 Nov
2002 22:24:18 +1100, Steven Reddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
smr Since I'm using the MSVC++ /W3 /WX options (max warnings, treat
warnings as
smr errors), the following two numbered
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows CE support for 0.9.7 (against 20021114
snapshot)
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sat, 16 Nov
2002 15:18:12 +1100, Steven Reddie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
smr Everything is done from the Windows box. The test*ce*.bat files use
cecopy
smr to copy files
Finally I've finished this port. The patches are very minimal because the
majority of the work is in a seperate library available from my website
(www.essemer.com.au/windowsce/).
After applying the patch:
cd openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20021114
unzip
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:owner-openssl-dev;openssl.org]On Behalf Of Richard Levitte - VMS
Whacker
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows CE support for 0.9.7 (against 20021114
snapshot)
Thanks! Looks good
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows CE support for 0.9.7 (against 20021114
snapshot)
Thanks! Looks good for the most part, the only thing that's just
non-traditional is the direct use of OPENSSL_SYSNAME_WINCE, but
that's easily taken care of.
Oh, yeah, is there any reason
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steven Reddie
Sent: Saturday, 16 November 2002 2:51 PM
To: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Windows CE support for 0.9.7 (against 20021114
snapshot)
I thought that OPENSSL_SYSNAME_
:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Windows CE support for 0.9.7 (against 20021114
snapshot)
We have built Steven's patch successfully for PocketPC and PocketPC 2002.
The issue is the many different hardware versions it needs to be compiled
for. With the makefile
.
Steven
-Original Message-
From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 16 November 2002 8:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Windows CE support for 0.9.7 (against 20021114
snapshot)
OK, there are a couple of things
