This was obsoleted by ticket 913, which I closed as something too old that
we're not going to do. So closing this.
Having said that (twice, actually), a PKCS11 ENGINE would be a cool thing to
have.
--
Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org
I've added the two latest contributions to
http://www.openssl.org/contrib/.
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
And oh, it might be interesting to port this to use the new STORE type
in 0.9.8-dev, which supports key generation...
[levitte - Thu Jun 12 03:27:57 2003]:
I've added the two latest contributions to
http://www.openssl.org/contrib/.
--
Richard Levitte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Richard,
Richard Levitte via RT wrote:
It's unfortunate that cryptoki.h is GPLd, or I would put it in our
contribution area.
GPL is not compatible with the OpenSSL license. Is it possible to
get a
different cryptoki.h?
I got the original cryptoki.h which is not GPLd from RSA and
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bull TrustWay RD, France
http://www.servers.bull.com/trustway
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
It's so nice that someone provided pkcs11 enginge patch.
Thanks, Afchine Madjlessi...
However I have one problem while compling openssl 0.9.7 beta5 with this
patch on Windows 2000. I just followed the intructions described
in intall.w32 from openssl 0.9.7 beta5:
1. perl Configure VC-WIN32 =
It's so nice that someone provided pkcs11 enginge patch.
Thanks a lot, Afchine Madjlessi...
However I have one problem while compling openssl 0.9.7 beta5 with this
patch on Windows 2000. I just followed the instructions described
in intall.w32 from openssl 0.9.7 beta5:
1. perl Configure
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 9:47 AM
Subject: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl
It's so nice that someone provided pkcs11 enginge patch.
Thanks a lot, Afchine Madjlessi...
However I have one
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 9:47 AM
Subject: [openssl.org #11] Fw: trustway pkcs11 engine for openssl
It's so nice that someone provided pkcs11 enginge patch.
Thanks a lot, Afchine Madjlessi...
However I have one
The new patch for pkcs#11 engine on openssl 0.9.7 delivered today to
RT/openssl corrects compile problem in windows platform.
Thanks to your advice!
Afchine Madjlessi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project
The new patch for pkcs#11 engine on openssl 0.9.7 delivered today to
RT/openssl corrects compile problem in windows platform.
Thanks to your advice!
Afchine Madjlessi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project
You can find attached the Bull Trustway PKCS#11 patch for openssl-
engine-0.9.6g.
Afchine Madjlessi
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bull - Trustway RD - Networking Security
http://www.servers.bull.com/trustway
Hi there,
Just a couple of thoughts on this ticket [#11]..
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu May 30 17:39:08 2002]:
Richard Levitte via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. could this engine be considered a general PKCS#11 engine, or are
there specific ties to Trustway. I'd prefer to see a general
Richard Levitte via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Those extra functions in the RSA method, are they really needed?
I understand that they provide a lot of automagic things, but then
it should be added in the ENGINE framework as something that would
be potentially available for any
Steven Bade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
We generate all keys within our tokens Some tokens such as the
4758 keep all the token objects within the secure boundary, and rely on
the proper PKCS#11 attributes to control selection, keys generated stay
within the FIPS4 boundary. Others which are
Zoran,
could you please send me source code of Eracom
PKCS11 engine for openssl?
regards
__[EMAIL PROTECTED]Bull
Technologies -Trustway RD - Networking Securityhttp://www.servers.bull.com/trustway
- Original Message -
From:
Zoran
I'm not sure about the second question, but we found that the eracom
engine submission was much more generic. When one of my co-workers
tried to get our PKCS#11 libraries (openCryptoki) used by the Trustway
module there were many issues, as well as specific calls directly to
PKCs#11
Richard Levitte via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've just started looking at this, and I've got a couple of
questions:
1. could this engine be considered a general PKCS#11 engine, or are
there specific ties to Trustway. I'd prefer to see a general
PKCS#11 engine.
This engine is a
Richard Levitte via RT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've just started looking at this, and I've got a couple of
questions:
1. could this engine be considered a general PKCS#11 engine, or are
there specific ties to Trustway. I'd prefer to see a general
PKCS#11 engine.
This engine is a
Steven Bade [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure about the second question, but we found that the eracom
engine submission was much more generic. When one of my co-workers
tried to get our PKCS#11 libraries (openCryptoki) used by the Trustway
module there were many issues, as well as
20 matches
Mail list logo
