Hello,
Sorry about this whole mess, the issue was discovered and fixed by the
OpenBSD team. I reply'd to the original person who discovered my
mistake of not attributing the OpenBSD team instead of to this list (I
thought I reply'd here). Again i'm sorry for this mess, and all credit
for finding
On Sun Jun 22 20:00:14 2014, k...@x64architecture.com wrote:
Hello,
Sorry about this whole mess, the issue was discovered and fixed by the
OpenBSD team. I reply'd to the original person who discovered my
mistake of not attributing the OpenBSD team instead of to this list (I
thought I reply'd
On 12 June 2014 23:15, Matt Caswell m...@openssl.org wrote:
On 12/06/14 22:43, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:26:56PM +0200, Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
Patch applied:
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=abfb989fe0b749ad61f1aa4cdb0ea4f952fc13e0
Many
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 06:15:28PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
On 12 June 2014 23:15, Matt Caswell m...@openssl.org wrote:
On 12/06/14 22:43, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:26:56PM +0200, Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
Patch applied:
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 08:51:35PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
You care confusing the matter. Kurt already expained he got the fix
from OpenBSD. After that explanation, the OpenSSL repo was fixed to
contain the attribution.
Hi. I can't seem to find the attribution fix you allude to. Can you
On 21 June 2014 19:51, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
You care confusing the matter. Kurt already expained he got the fix
from OpenBSD. After that explanation, the OpenSSL repo was fixed to
contain the attribution.
I think we are all getting confused in this thread! :-)
Otto - I think
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 09:58:33PM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 21 June 2014 19:51, Otto Moerbeek o...@drijf.net wrote:
You care confusing the matter. Kurt already expained he got the fix
from OpenBSD. After that explanation, the OpenSSL repo was fixed to
contain the attribution.
I
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:15:18PM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 12/06/14 22:43, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:26:56PM +0200, Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
Patch applied:
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=abfb989fe0b749ad61f1aa4cdb0ea4f952fc13e0
Patch applied:
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=abfb989fe0b749ad61f1aa4cdb0ea4f952fc13e0
Many thanks for your contribution.
Matt
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:26:56PM +0200, Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
Patch applied:
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=abfb989fe0b749ad61f1aa4cdb0ea4f952fc13e0
Many thanks for your contribution.
Matt
On 12/06/14 22:43, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:26:56PM +0200, Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
Patch applied:
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=abfb989fe0b749ad61f1aa4cdb0ea4f952fc13e0
Many thanks for your contribution.
Matt
Hi, In the ssl_cipher_get_evp() function, there are two off-by-one
errors in index validation before accessing arrays. The attached patch
fixes the problem.
Regards,
Kurt Cancemi
From 72e339f36be4a40436b95a0d07d68167605c31e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kurt Cancemi k...@x64architecture.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
